Cover not available

In:Corpus Pragmatic Studies on the History of Medical Discourse
Edited by Turo Hiltunen and Irma Taavitsainen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 330] 2022
► pp. 1–20

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 1
Corpora, pragmatics, and historical medical discourse

 | University of Helsinki
 | University of Helsinki
Published online: 1 July 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.330.01hil
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Main themes in the present volume
  • 3.Medical writing from a historical perspective
  • 4.Insights from corpora
  • Notes
  • References
References (86)
References
Archer, Dawn, Jonathan Culpeper, and Matthew Davies. 2008. “Pragmatic Annotation.” In Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook. Volume 1, ed. by Anke Lüdeling, and Merja Kytö, 613–640. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight. 1999. Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context. The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight, and Ellen Valle. 2012. “Corpus Analysis of Scientific and Medical Writing Across Time.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by Carol A. Chapelle. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad. 2019. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2nd edition. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1994. “Intra-Textual Variation within Medical Research Articles.” In Corpus-Based Research into Language. In Honour of Jan Aarts, ed. by Nelleke Oostdijk, and Pieter de Haan, 201–221. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Edward Finegan, and Dwight Atkinson. 1993. “ARCHER and Its Challenges: Compiling and Exploring a Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers.” In Creating and Using English Language Corpora, ed. by Udo Fries, Gunnel Tottie, and Peter Schneider, 1–13. Amsterdam: RodopiGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Michael. 2011. Performing Medicine: Medical Culture and Identity in Provincial England, c. 1760–1850. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bynum, W. F. 1994. Science and the Practice of Medicine in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clancy, Brian, and Anne O’Keeffe. 2015. “Pragmatics.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Douglas Biber, and Randi Reppen, 235–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan. 2015. “Register variation.” In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Douglas Biber and Randi Reppen, 309–329. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2012. “Expanding Horizons in Historical Linguistics with the 400-Million Word Corpus of Historical American English.” Corpora 7 (2): 122–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dorgeloh, Heidrun. 2016. “The Interrelationship of Register and Genre in Medical Discourse.” In Variational Text Linguistics: Revisiting Register in English, ed. by Christoph Schubert and Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer, 43–65. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1994. “Dialect, Register and Genre. Working Assumptions about Conventionalization.” In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, ed. by Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan, 15–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flanagan, Joseph. 2017. “Reproducible Research: Strategies, Tools, and Workflows.” In Big and Rich Data in English Corpus Linguistics: Methods and Explorations. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 19, ed. by Turo Hiltunen, Tanja Säily, and Joe McVeigh. [URL]
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” In The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, 3–30. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio. 2001. “The Experimental Essay in Early Modern English.” European Journal of English Studies 5 (2): 221–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio, and Francoise Salager-Meyer (eds). 2006. Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis: Oral and Written Contexts. Bern: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio, Stefania Maci, and Michele Sala (eds). 2015. Insights into Medical Communication. Bern: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany Ekle, Douglas Biber, and Turo Hiltunen. 2011. “The Expression of Stance in Early (1665–1712) Publications of the Philosophical Transactions and Other Contemporary Medical Prose: Innovations in a Pioneering Discourse.” In Medical Writing in Early Modern English, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Päivi Pahta, 221–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardie, Andrew. 2014. “Modest XML for Corpora: Not a Standard, but a Suggestion.” ICAME Journal 38: 73–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo. 2010. “Philosophical Transactions.” In Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Päivi Pahta, 127–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Intensification in Eighteenth Century Medical Writing. Journal of English Linguistics, 49 (1), 90–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, and Jukka Tyrkkö. 2013. “Tagging Early Modern English Medical Texts.” Paper presented at the Corpus Analysis with Noise in the Signal (CANS) workshop, Lancaster University, 22nd July 2013. [URL]
Hiltunen, Turo, and Jukka Tyrkkö. 2019. “Manual to the LMEMT Corpus.” In Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Turo Hiltunen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, Tanja Säily, and Joe McVeigh. 2017. “How to Turn Linguistic Data into Evidence.” In Big and Rich Data in English Corpus Linguistics: Methods and Explorations. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 19, ed. by Turo Hiltunen, Tanja Säily, and Joe McVeigh. [URL]
Honkapohja, Alpo. 2017. Alchemy, Medicine, and Commercial Book Production. Turnhout: Brepols. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Andreas, and Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. “The Historical Perspective in Pragmatics.” In Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, 3–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2008. “Historical Pragmatics.” Language and Linguistic Compass 2 (5), 894–906. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. “Corpus Pragmatics” In Methods in Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, Klaus P. Schneider, and Wolfram Bublitz, 455–66. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Daniel Schreier, and Marianne Hundt. 2009. “Corpus Linguistics, Pragmatics and Discourse.” In Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse, Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29), ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier, and Marianne Hundt, 3–7. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Irma Taavitsainen. 2014. “Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics: Intersections and Interactions.” In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker, and Jukka Tuominen, 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jurin, James. 1724. An Account of The Success of Inoculating The Small Pox in Great Britain. London: J. Peele.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. 2009. “Historical Corpus Pragmatics: Focus on Speech Acts and Texts.” In Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse. Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME29), ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier, and Marianne Hundt, 13–36. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 2018. “Reflecting on the Quantitative Turn in Linguistics.” Online lecture. University of Freiburg. [URL]. (Accessed 9 February 2021.)
Labov, William. 1972. “Some Principles of Linguistic Methodology.” Language in Society 1 (1): 97–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehto, Anu, Alistair Baron, Maura Ratia, and Paul Rayson. 2011. “Improving the Precision of Corpus Methods: The Standardized Version of Early Modern English Medical Texts.” In Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen and Päivi Pahta, 279–290. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark. 2014. “How Big Data is Changing How We Study Languages.” The Guardian, 7 April 2014. [URL]
Marchi, Anna, and Charlotte Taylor. 2018. “Introduction: Partiality and Reflexivity.” In Corpus Approaches to Discourse. A Critical Review, ed. by Charlotte Taylor, and Anna Marchi, 1–16. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, Gillian. 2014. “Pragmatics and Medical Discourse.” Pragmatics of Discourse, ed. by Klaus P. Schneider, and Anne Barron, 491–524. Berlin, München, Boston: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mehl, Seth. 2021. “Why Linguists Should Care about Digital Humanities (and Epidemiology).” Journal of English Linguistics, 49 (3), 331–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Millar, Neil, Brian Budgell, and Keith Fuller. 2013. “‘Use The Active Voice Whenever Possible’: The Impact of Style Guidelines in Medical Journals.” Applied Linguistics 34 (4): 393–414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moessner, Lilo. 2008. “Variation and Change in the Writings of 17th-Century Scientists.” In English Historical Linguistics 2006. Volume II: Lexical and Semantic Change, ed. by Richard Dury, Maurizio Gotti and Maria Dossena, 75–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1999. “Making the Best Use of “Bad” Data: Evidence for Sociolinguistic Variation in Early Modern English.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 100 (4): 499–533.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nwogu, Kevin Ngozi. 1997. “The Medical Research Paper: Structure and Functions.” English for Specific Purposes 16 (2): 119–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ordóñez-López, Pilar and Nuria Edo-Marzá. 2016. “Medical Discourse: Building Bridges between Medicine and Society.” Medical Discourse in Professional, Academic and Popular Settings, ed. by Pilar Ordóñez-López, and Nuria Edo-Marzá, 1–8. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi. 1998. Medieval Embryology in the Vernacular: The Case of De spermate [Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 53]. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi and Irma Taavitsainen. 2004. ”Vernacularisation of scientific and medical writing in its sociohistorical context.” In Medical and Scientific Writing in Late Medieval English, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen and Päivi Pahta, 1–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piqué-Angordans, Jordi, and Santiago Posteguillo. 2006. “Medical Discourse and Academic Genres.” In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ed. by Keith Brown, 649–657. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pumfrey, Stephen, Paul Rayson, and John Mariani. 2012. “Experiments in 17th Century English: Manual versus Automatic Conceptual History”. Literary and Linguistic Computing 27 (4): 395–408. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Redden, Elizabeth. 2020. “Rush to Publish Risks Undermining COVID-19 Research.” Inside Higher Education, 8 June 2020. [URL]
Rissanen, Matti, and Jukka Tyrkkö. 2013. “The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts (HC).” In Principles and Practices for the Digital Editing and Annotation of Diachronic Data. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 12, ed. by Anneli Meurman-Solin, and Jukka Tyrkkö. Helsinki: VARIENG. [URL]
Rockwell, Geoffrey. 2013. “Inclusion in Digital Humanities.” In Defining Digital Humanities: A Reader, ed. by Melissa Terras, Julianne Nyhan and Edward Vanhouette. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús. 2008. Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Editorial: Corpus Pragmatics.” Corpus Pragmatics 1: 1–2. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph, and Karin Aijmer. 2015. “Corpus Pragmatics: Laying the Foundations.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. by Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise, María Ángeles Alcaraz Ariza, and Maryelis Pabón Berbesí. 2007. “Collegiality, Critique and the Construction of Scientific Argumentation in Medical Book Reviews: A Diachronic Approach.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1758–1774. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Nicholas, Sebastian Hoffmann, and Paul Rayson. 2008. “Corpus Tools and Methods, Today and Tomorrow: Incorporating Linguists’ Manual Annotations.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 23 (2): 163–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John. 2000. “Language for Specific Purposes.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20: 59–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2000. Scientific Language and Standardisation 1375–1550. In The Development of Standard English: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts, ed. by Laura Wright, 131–154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Scholastic Genre Scripts in English Medical Writing 1375–1800.” In Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change, ed. by Richard J. Whitt, 95–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Polite Society Language Practices: Letters to the Editor in The Gentleman’s Magazine.” In Irma Taavitsainen and Turo Hiltunen (eds). 2019. Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century, 129–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “A Medical Debate of ‘Heated Pamphleteering’ in the Early Eighteenth Century.” In Manners, Norms and Transgressions in the History of English: Literary and Linguistic Approaches, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 141–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “Scientific book reviews in the seventeenth century: Early stages of the genre.” In The Role of Context in the Production and Reception of Historical News Discourse, ed. by Nicholas Brownlees. 67–86. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Susan Fitzmaurice. 2007. “What It Is and How to Do It.” In Methods in Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen, 11–36. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Turo Hiltunen (eds). 2019. Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Turo Hiltunen. Forthcoming. “Medical and Scientific Writing.” In New Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume II: Documentation, sources of data and modelling, ed. by Merja Kytö and Erik Smitterberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Taavitsainen, Irma, Peter Murray Jones, and Turo Hiltunen. 2019. “Sociohistorical and Cultural Context of Late Modern English Medical Texts.” In Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century, ed. by Turo Hiltunen, and Irma Taavitsainen, 17–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Päivi Pahta. 2010. “Scientific Discourse.” In Handbook of Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 3–32. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Andreas H. Jucker. 2015. “Twenty Years of Historical Pragmatics: Origins, Developments and Changing Thought Styles.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16 (1): 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Päivi Pahta (eds). 2010. Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(eds). 2011. Medical Writing in Early Modern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Turo Hiltunen, Anu Lehto, Ville Marttila, Päivi Pahta, Maura Ratia, Carla Suhr and Jukka Tyrkkö. 2019. Late Modern English Medical Texts: The Corpus. In Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Turo Hiltunen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Päivi Pahta, Turo Hiltunen, Martti Mäkinen, Ville Marttila, Maura Ratia, Carla Suhr, and Jukka Tyrkkö. 2010. Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus. In Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Päivi Pahta. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Päivi Pahta, and Martti Mäkinen. 2005. Middle English Medical Texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Jeremy J. Smith, Carla Suhr, and Turo Hiltunen. (Forthcoming). Genre in Early Modern Medical English: Sociocultural Contexts of Production and Use, 1500–1820. (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth. 2008. “The State of English Language Studies: A Linguistic Perspective.” In English Now: Selected Papers from the 20th IAUPE Conference in Lund 2007. Lund Studies in English 112, ed. by Marianne Thormählen, 199–225. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 2013. “Continental European Perspective View.” In The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Yan Huang. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voigts, Linda E. 1984. “Medical Prose.” In Middle English Prose: A Critical Guide to Major Authors and Genres, ed. by A. S. G. Edwards, 315–335. New Brunswick: Rutgers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989. “Scientific and Medical Books.” In Book Production and Publishing in Britain, 1375–1475, ed. by Jeremy Griffths, and Derek Pearsall, 345–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wear, Andrew. 2000. Knowledge and Practice in English Medicine, 1550–1680. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webster, Charles. 1975. The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine and Reform 1626–1660. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue