In:Email Pragmatics and Second Language Learners
Edited by Maria Economidou-Kogetsidis, Milica Savić and Nicola Halenko
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 328] 2021
► pp. 71–100
Chapter 3Long-term instructional effects on learners’ use of email request modifiers
Published online: 27 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.328.03uso
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.328.03uso
Abstract
This study followed a pre-test/post-test/delayed post-test design to investigate the long-term impact of metapragmatic instruction on learners’ ability to modify email requests. Twenty-five Spanish university students with an upper-intermediate proficiency level in English participated in the study. Over a two-week period, they received six hours of instruction on request modifiers by applying a form-function-context mapping framework (Taguchi 2011). Target request modifiers in written Discourse Completion Tasks (DCTs) were analysed for frequency and variety. Learners’ self-evaluations of email appropriateness were also used to determine their degree of confidence when producing request modifiers. The within-group comparisons revealed that learners made a significant progress in their use of request modifiers and confidence level immediately after instruction and two months later. These comparisons, however, also indicated that some types of request modifiers were more amenable to instruction than others.
Keywords: Spanish EFL learners, requests, emails, instructional pragmatics, delayed test
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 3.Method
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Instructional targets
- 3.3Instructional procedure
- 3.3.1Session 1: Researching and Reflecting
- 3.3.2Session 2: Receiving and Reasoning
- 3.3.3Session 3: Rehearsing and Revising
- 3.4Data collection procedure
- 3.5Data analysis and statistical procedure
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Learners’ frequency of request modifiers
- 4.2Learners’ variety of request modifiers
- 4.3Learners’ confidence in judging the appropriateness of email request modifiers
- 5.Conclusions, limitations and pedagogical implications
References Appendix
References (46)
Alcón-Soler, Eva. 2007. “Fostering EFL Learners’ Awareness of Requesting through Explicit and Implicit Consciousness-tasks.” In Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning, ed. by María Pilar García-Mayo, 221–241. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
. 2013. "Mitigating e-mail requests in teenagers' first and second language academic cyber-consultation." Multilingua 32(6): 779-799.
. 2015. “Pragmatic Learning and Study Abroad: Effects of Instruction and Length of Stay.” System 48: 62–74.
Alcón Soler, Eva. 2018. “Effects of Task-supported Language Teaching on Learners’ Use and Knowledge of Email Request Mitigators.” In Task-based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics, ed. by Naoko Taguchi and Kim YouJin, 55–81. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Biesenbach-Lucas, Sigrun. 2007. “Students Writing E-mails to Faculty: An Examination of E-politeness Among Native and Non-native Speakers of English.” Language Learning and Technology 11 (2): 59–81.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper. (eds.) 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Butler, Emily. 2012. “Politeness is More Than ‘Please’: Teaching Email Requests.” ORTESOL Journal 29: 12–20.
Byram, Michael. 1997. Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
Chen, Chi-Fen Emily. 2006. “The Development of E-mail Literacy: From Writing to Peers to Writing to Authority Figures.” Language Learning and Technology 10 (2): 35–55.
Chen, Yuan-shan. 2015. “Developing Chinese EFL Learners’ Email Literacy through Request to Faculty.” Journal of Pragmatics 75: 131–149.
. 2016. “Understanding the Development of Chinese EFL Learners’ Email Literacy Through Exploratory Practice.” Language Teaching Research 20 (2): 165–180.
Codina Espurz, Victòria, and Patricia Salazar Campillo. 2019. “Student-to-Faculty Consultation in English, Spanish and Catalan in an Academic Context.” In Investigating the Learning of Pragmatics across Ages and Contexts, ed. by Victòria Codina-Espurz, and Patricia Salazar-Campillo, 196–217. Leiden/Boston: Brill Rodopi.
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria. 2011. “‘Please Answer Me as Soon as Possible’: Pragmatic Failure in Non-native Speakers’ E-mail Requests to Faculty.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3193–3215.
Eslami, Zohreh R., and Chia Ning Liu. 2013. “Learning Pragmatics through Computer-mediated Communication in Taiwan.” Iranian Journal of Society, Culture & Language 1 (1): 52–73.
Eslami, Zohreh R., Azizullah Mirzaei, and Shadi Dini. 2015. “The Role of Asynchronous Computer Mediated Communication in the Instruction and Development of EFL Leaners’ Pragmatic Competence.” System 48: 99–111.
Félix-Brasdefer, César. 2012. “E-mail Request to Faculty. E-politeness and Internal Modification.” In Interlanguage Request Modification, ed. by Maria Economidou-Kogetsidis, and Helen Woodfield, 87–118. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ford, Shawn. 2006. “The Use of Pragmatics in E-mail Requests Made by Second Language Learners of English.” Studies in Language Sciences 5: 143–162.
Fukuya, Yoshinori J., and Yao Zhang. 2002. “Effects of Recasts on EFL Learners’ Acquisition of Pragmalinguistic Conventions of Request.” Second Language Studies 21 (1): 1–47.
Gebhard, Meg. 2019. Teaching and Researching ELLs’ Disciplinary Literacies: Systemic Functional Linguistics in Action in the Context of U.S. School Reform. New York: Routledge.
Hartford, Beverly. S., and Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig. 1996. “‘At Your Earliest Convenience:’ A Study of Written Requests to Faculty.” In The Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series, Volume 7, ed. by Lawrence Bouton, 55–69. Urbana-Campaign, IL: DEIL: University of Illinois.
Hendriks, Berna. 2010. “An Experimental Study of Native Speaker Perceptions of Non-native Request Modification in E-mails in English.” Intercultural Pragmatics 7(2): 221–255.
Kankaanranta, Anne. 2006. “‘Hej Seppo, Could you Pls Comment on this!’: Internal Email Communication in Lingua Franca English in a Multinational Company.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Jyväskylä.
Kohls, L. Robert. 1996. The Survival Kit for Overseas Living: For American Planning to Live and Work Abroad. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
Martínez-Flor, Alicia, and Esther Usó-Juan. 2006a. “A Comprehensive Pedagogical Framework to Develop Pragmatics in the Foreign Language Classroom: The 6Rs Approach.” Applied Language Learning 16 (2): 39–63.
. 2006b. “Learners’ Use of Request Modifiers Across Two University ESP disciplines.” Ibérica 12: 23–41.
. 2020. “Teaching L2 Speech Acts.” In Developmental and Clinical Pragmatics, ed. by Klaus P. Schneider, and Elly Ifantidou, 269–300. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.
Martín-Laguna, Sofía. 2020. Tasks, Pragmatics and Multilingualism in the Classroom: A Portrait of Adolescent Writing in Multiple Languages. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters..
Martín-Laguna, Sofía, and Eva Alcón-Soler. 2018. “Development of Discourse-pragmatic Markers in a Multilingual Classroom: A Mixed Method Research Approach.” System 75: 68–80.
Nguyen, Thi Thuy Minh. 2012. “Instructional Effects on the Acquisition of Modifiers in Constructive Criticism by EFL Learners.” Language Awareness 22 (1): 76–94.
. 2018. “Pragmatic Development in the Instructed Context. A Longitudinal Investigation of L2 Email Requests.” Pragmatics 28 (2): 217–252.
Nguyen, Thi Thuy Minh, Thi Thanh Ha Do, Tuan Anh Nguyen, and Thi Thanh Thuy Pham. 2015. “Teaching Email Requests in the Academic Context: A Focus on the Role of Corrective Feedback.” Language Awareness 24 (2): 169–195.
Nguyen, Thi Thuy Minh, Thi Thanh Ha Do, Thi Thanh Thuy Pham, and Tuan Anh Nguyen. 2019. “The Effects of Corrective Feedback With and Without Revision on Enhancing L2 Pragmatic Competence.” Applied Pragmatics 1 (1): 1–25.
Nikula, Tarja. 1996. Pragmatic Force Modifiers. A study in Interlanguage Pragmatics. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2013. “An Integrative Proposal to Teach the Pragmatics of Phatic Communication in ESL Classes.” Intercultural Pragmatics 10 (1): 131–160.
. 2019. “Dealing with Jokes in the ESL Class: A Pedagogical Proposal Centred on Comprehension.” Letronica 12 (4).
Pan, Ping Cathy. 2012. “Interlanguage Requests in Institutional E-mail Discourse: A Study in Hong Kong.” In Interlanguage Request Modification, ed. by Maria Economidou-Kogetsidis, and Helen Woodfield, 119–161. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Schmidt, Richard. 1993. “Consciousness, Learning and Interlanguage Pragmatics.” In Interlanguage Pragmatics, ed. by Gabriele Kasper, and Shoshana Blum-Kulka, 21–42. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sydorenko, Tetyana. 2015. “The Use of Computer-Delivered Structured Tasks in Pragmatic Instruction: An Exploratory Study.” Intercultural Pragmatics 12 (3): 333–362.
Taguchi, Naoko. 2011. “Teaching Pragmatics: Trends and Issues.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 289–310.
Taguchi, Naoko, and Youjin Kim. 2016. “Collaborative Dialogue in Learning Pragmatics: Pragmatic-related Episodes as an Opportunity for Learning Request-making.” Applied Linguistics 37 (3): 416–437.
Takahashi, Satomi. 2001. “The Role of Input Enhancement in Developing Pragmatic Competence.” In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, ed. by Kenneth R. Rose, and Gabriele Kasper, 171–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tseng, Chia-Ti Heather. 2015. “You Must Let Me Pass, Please!: An Investigation of Email Request Strategies by Taiwanese EFL Learners.” Journal of ELT and Applied Linguistics (JELTAL) 3 (1): 11–28.
University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (UCLES). 2001. CAMBRIDGE IELTS with answers 2 – Examination Papers from University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate. Cambridge University Press.
Woodfield, Helen, and Maria Economidou-Kogetsidis. 2010. “I Just Need More Time: A Study of Native and Non-native Requests to Faculty for an Extension.” Multilingua 29 (1): 77–118.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Safont, Pilar
Martín-Laguna, Sofía
Martínez-Flor, Alicia, Ariadna Sánchez-Hernández & Júlia Barón
2023. L2 pragmatics in action. In L2 Pragmatics in Action [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 58], ► pp. 3 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
