In:Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in language and social interaction
Edited by Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 326] 2021
► pp. 251–276
Co-presence during lapses
On “comfortable silences” in Finnish everyday interaction
Published online: 17 November 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.326.12vat
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.326.12vat
Abstract
This study examines video-recorded, naturally occurring
Finnish dyads focusing on lapses (inter-sequential silences). During
most lapses, participants undertake bodily activities or behaviors
(Hoey 2015). Adding to
previous work, this study describes “comfortable” silences where
participants share the moment with no bodily activities or mutual
gaze, inhabiting the silence with simple co-presence. The analysis
suggests that instead of the gathering/encounter dualism,
participant behavior in social situations is better described as a
continuum of orientations. Also during the “comfortable” silences,
understanding of behavioral involvements is intersubjectively
created and maintained. Thus, even outside of sequences that
allegedly create and maintain the “architecture of
intersubjectivity” (Heritage
1984), social organization is jointly negotiated and
achieved, most importantly by mutual monitoring and reciprocation of
(bodily) orientations.
Keywords: lapse, silence, gathering, encounter, co-presence, embodiment, conversation analysis, Finnish
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Co-presence and social situations
- 2.Empirical background: Lapses as silent moments in interaction
- 3.Data and methodology
- 4.On ways to orient to lapses: Towards the “comfortable” silence
- 5.On the reciprocity of orientations: Negotiating understandings of the lapse
- 6.Concluding remarks: On co-presence and its intersubjective transformation
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (50)
Basso, Keith H. 1970. “‘To
Give up on Words’: Silence in Western Apache
Culture.” Southwestern
Journal of
Anthropology 26 (3): 213–230.
Berger, Israel, Rowena Viney, and John P. Rae. 2016. “Do
Continuing States of Incipient Talk
Exist?” Journal of
Pragmatics 91: 29–44.
Bergmann, Jörg R. 1990. “On
the Local Sensitivity of
Conversation.” In The
Dynamics of Dialogue, ed.
by I. Markovà, and K. Foppa, 201–226. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Carbaugh, Donal, Michael Berry, and Marjatta Nurmikari-Berry. 2006. “Coding
Personhood through Cultural Terms and Practices: Silence and
Quietude as a Finnish ‘Natural Way of
Being’”. Journal of Language
and Social
Psychology 25: 203–220.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2010. “Commentary
on Stivers and Rossano: ‘Mobilizing
Response’”. Research on
Language and Social
Interaction 43 (1): 32–37.
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2015. “Retrospection
and Understanding in
Interaction.” In Temporality
in Interaction, ed.
by A. Deppermann, and S. Günther, 57–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
De Stefani, Elwys, and Lorenza Mondada. 2018. “Encounters
in Public Space: How Acquainted versus Unacquainted Persons
Establish Social and Spatial
Arrangements.” Research on
Language and Social
Interaction 51(3): 248–270.
Ford, Cecilia E., and Barbara A. Fox. 2010. “Multiple
Practices for Constructing
Laughables.” In Prosody
in Interaction, ed.
by D. Barth-Weingarten, E. Reber, and M. Selting, 339–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gardner, Rod. 1997. “The
Conversation Object
mm: A Weak and Variable Acknowledging Token.”
Research on Language and Social
Interaction 30(2): 131–156.
Gardner, Rod, and Ilana Mushin. 2015. “Expanded
Transition Spaces: the Case of
Garrwa.” Frontiers in
Psychology 6: 251.
Goodwin, Charles. 1981. Conversational
Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and
Hearers. New York: Academic Press.
. 1986. “Gesture
as a Resource for the Organization of Mutual
Orientation.” Semiotica 62(1–2): 29–49.
Hakulinen, Auli. 2010. “Ingressive
Speech in Finnish Interaction.” A presentation at the
International Conference on Conversation Analysis, ICCA10,
Mannheim. July
4–8.
Heath, Christian. 1988. “Embarrassment
and Interactional
Organization.” In Erving
Goffman: Exploring the Interaction
Order, ed.
by P. Drew, and A. Wootton, 136–160. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heritage, John. 1984. “A
Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential
Placement.” In Structures
of Social Action: Studies in Conversation
Analysis, ed.
by J. M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoey, Elliott. 2015. “Lapses:
How People Arrive at, and Deal with, Discontinuities in
Talk.” Research on Language
and Social
Interaction 48(4): 430–453.
. 2017a. Lapse
Organization in
Interaction. Doctoral
dissertation. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.
. 2017b. “Sequence
Recompletion: A Practice for Managing Lapses in
Conversation.” Journal of
Pragmatics 109: 47–63.
Hoey, Elliott M. 2018. “How
Speakers Continue with Talk after a Lapse in
Conversation.” Research on
Language and Social
Interaction 51(3): 329–346.
2020. When
Conversation Lapses: The Public Accountability of Silent
Copresence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jefferson, Gail. 1989. “Notes
on a Possible Metric Which Provides for a ‘Standard Maximum’
Silence of Approximately One Second in
Conversation.” In Conversation:
An Interdisciplinary
Perspective, ed.
by D. Roger, and P. Bull, 166–196. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
. 2004. “Glossary
of Transcript Symbols with an
Introduction.” In Conversation
Analysis: Studies from the First
Generation, ed.
by Gene Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kendrick, Kobin H., and Francisco Torreira. 2015. “The
Timing and Construction of Preference: A Quantitative
Study.” Discourse Processes 52(4): 255–289.
Luopa, Anna. 2016. ”Kiusallinen
hiljaisuus” – Keskustelutauot ja puhujien keinot selvitä
niistä
kasvokkaiskeskustelussa. Master’s
thesis. Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian
Studies, University of
Helsinki.
McLaughlin, Margaret L., and Michael J. Cody. 1982. “Awkward
Silences: Behavioral Antecedents and Consequences of the
Conversational Lapse.” Human
Communication
Research 8(4): 299–316.
Mondada, Lorenza. 2009. “Emergent
Focused Interactions in Public Places: A Systematic Analysis
of the Multimodal Achievement of a Common Interactional
Space.” Journal of
Pragmatics 41: 1977–1997.
2016. “Challenges
of Multimodality: Language and the Body in Social
interaction.” Journal of
Sociolinguistics 20: 336–366.
2018. “The
Multimodal Interactional Organization of Tasting: Practices
of Tasting Cheese in Gourmet
Shops.” Discourse
Studies 20(6): 743–769.
2019. Conventions
for multimodal transcription. [URL].
Mushin, Ilana, and Rod Gardner. 2009. “Silence
Is Talk: Conversational Silence in Australian Aboriginal
Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal
of
Pragmatics 41(10): 2033–2052.
Pietikäinen, Kaisa S. 2018. “Silence
That Speaks: The Local Inferences of Withholding a Response
in Intercultural Couples’
Conflicts.” Journal of
Pragmatics 129: 76–89.
Rossano, Federico. 2012. Gaze
Behavior in Face-to-Face
Interaction. Doctoral dissertation.
MPI Series
71. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A
Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for
Conversation.” Language 50: 696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1992. “Repair
after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of
Intersubjectivity in
Conversation.” American
Journal of
Sociology 97(5): 1295–1345.
Scollon, Ron. 1985. “The
Machine stops: Silence in the Metaphor of
Malfunction.” In Perspectives
on Silence, ed.
by D. Tannen, and M. Saville-Troike, 21–30. Norwood: Ablex.
Sidnell, Jack, and Tanya Stivers (eds). 2013. The
Handbook of Conversation
Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 2001. Responding
in Conversation. A Study of Response Particles in
Finnish. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Stivers, Tanya, N. J. Enfield, P. Brown, C. Englert, M. Hayashi, T. Heinemann, G. Hoymann, F. Rossano, J. P. De Ruiter, K-E. Yoon, and S. C. Levinson. 2009. “Universals
and Cultural Variation in Turn-Taking in
Conversation.” Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America 106(26): 10587–10592.
Szymanski, Margaret. 1999. “Re-engaging
and Dis-engaging Talk in
Activity.” Language in
Society 28 (1): 1–23.
Vatanen, Anna. 2018. “Trajectories
of Embodied Activities and the Management of
Lapses.” Paper presented at
the 5th International Conference on Conversation Analysis
(ICCA2018), Loughborough, UK. 11–15
July.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Bührig, Kristin, Natalia Filatkina & Wolfgang Imo
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
