In:Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in language and social interaction
Edited by Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 326] 2021
► pp. 201–230
Shared understandings of the human–nature relationship in encounters with small wildlife
Published online: 17 November 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.326.10rau
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.326.10rau
Abstract
Drawing on video data and ethnomethodological
conversation analysis, the study focuses on sequences of human
action and interaction in which participants orient to small
wildlife within their nature-related activities outdoors. The
participants are family members, friends or participants on
organized outings, and they engage in activities such as trekking,
foraging and fishing. The study examines moments when small wildlife
become the focus of the participants’ talk and other action and when
the relationship between human beings and the natural world is thus
constructed in situ. The study considers how participants in such
moments display, pursue and achieve shared understandings about what
the appropriate ways of treating other living beings and, more
generally, conducting oneself in nature are.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data
- 3.Analysis
- 3.1Displaying shared understandings
- 3.2Setting an example and guiding others to achieve a shared understanding
- 3.3Guiding and instructing others to pursue a shared understanding
- 4.Conclusion
Acknowledgements References
References (55)
Bergeå, Hanna, Cathrin Martin, and Fritjof Sahlström. 2008. “‘I
Don’t Know What You’re Looking for’: Professional Vision in
Swedish Agricultural Extension on Nature Conservation
Management.” Journal of
Agricultural Education and
Extension 14
(4): 329–345.
Broth, Mathias, and Lorenza Mondada. 2013. “Walking
Away: The Embodied Achievement of Activity Closings in
Mobile Interaction.” Journal
of Pragmatics 47
(1): 41–58.
Cekaite, Asta. 2015. “The
Coordination of Talk and Touch in Adults’ Directives to
Children: Touch and Social
Control.” Research on
Language and Social
Interaction 48
(2): 152–175.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2014. “What
Does Grammar Tell Us about
Action?” Pragmatics 24: 623–647.
De Stefani, Elwys. 2010. “Reference
as an Interactively and Multimodally Accomplished Practice.
Organizing Spatial Reorientation in Guided
Tours.” In Spoken
Communication, ed.
by Massimo Pettorino, Antonella Giannini, Isabella Chiari, and Francesca Dovetto, 137–170. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
De Stefani, Elwys, and Lorenza Mondada. 2014. “Reorganizing
Mobile Formations: When “Guided” Participants Initiate
Reorientations in Guided
Tours.” Space and
Culture 17
(2): 157–175.
. 2017. “Who’s
the Expert? Negotiating Competence and Authority in Guided
Tours.” In Identity
Struggles: Evidence from Workplaces around the
World, ed.
by Dorien Van De Mieroop, and Stephanie Schnurr, 95–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2015a. “When
Recipient Design Fails: Egocentric Turn-Design of
Instructions in Driving School Lessons Leading to Breakdowns
of
Intersubjectivity.” Gesprächsforschung 16: 63–101.
, 2015b. “Retrospection
and Understanding in
Interaction.” In Temporality
in Interaction, ed.
by Arnulf Deppermann, and Susanne Günthner, 57–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2019. “Intersubjectivity
and Other Grounds for Action-Coordination in an Environment
of Restricted Interaction: Coordinating with Oncoming
Traffic When Passing an
Obstacle.” Language &
Communication 65: 22–40.
Fasulo, Alessandra, Heather Loyd, and Vincenzo Padiglione. 2007. “Children’s
Socialization into Cleaning Practices: A Cross-Cultural
Perspective.” Discourse &
Society 18: 11–33.
Fatigante, Marilena, Vivian Liberatia, and Clotilde Pontecorvo. 2010. “Transitions
In and Out of Games: How Parents and Children Bracket Game
Episodes at Home.” Research
on Language and Social
Interaction 43
(4): 346–371.
Galatolo, Renata, and Letizia Caronia. 2018. “Morality
at Dinnertime: The Sense of the Other as a Practical
Accomplishment in Family
Interaction.” Discourse &
Society 29
(1): 43–62.
George, Rachel. 2013. “‘What’s
a Vendetta?’ Political Socialization in the Everyday
Interactions of Los Angeles
Families.” Discourse &
Society 24
(1): 46–65.
Glenn, Phillip. 1989. “Initiating
Shared Laughter in Multi-Party
Conversations.” Western
Journal of Speech
Communication 53: 127–149.
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 2012. “Car
Talk: Integrating Texts, Bodies, and Changing
Landscapes.” Semiotica 191
(1): 257–286.
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 2007. “Occasioned
Knowledge Exploration in Family
Interaction.” Discourse &
Society 18
(1): 93–110.
Haddington, Pentti, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile. 2014. “Towards
Multiactivity as a Social and Interactional
Phenomenon.” In Multiactivity
in Social Interaction: Beyond
Multitasking, ed.
by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 3–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hakulinen, Auli, Leelo Keevallik Eriksson, and Jan Lindström. 2003.
“Kuule, kule, hördu –
projicerande praktiker i finska, estniska och svenska samtal
[Kuule, kule, hördu– practices of
projection in Finnish, Estonian and Swedish
conversation].” In Grammatik
och samtal: Studier till minne av Mats
Eriksson [Grammar and conversation:
Studies in the memory of Mats
Eriksson], ed.
by Bengt Nordberg, Leelo Keevallik Eriksson, Kerstin Thelander, and Mats Thelander, 199–218. Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.
Hakulinen, Auli, and Eeva-Leena Seppänen. 1992. “Finnish
kato: From Verb to
Particle.” Journal of
Pragmatics 18: 527–549.
Hakulinen, Auli, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2009. “Designing
Utterances for Action: Verb Repeat Responses to
Assessments.” In Talk
in Interaction. Comparative
Dimensions, ed.
by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, and Jan Lindström, 124–151. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Heritage, John, and Tanya Stivers. 1999. “Online
Commentary in Acute Medical Visits: A Method of Shaping
Patient Expectations.” Social
Science &
Medicine 49: 1501–1517.
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary
of Transcript Symbols with an
Introduction.” In Conversation
Analysis: Studies from the First
Generation, ed.
by Gene Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Keevallik, Leelo. 2010. “Bodily
Quoting in Dance
Correction.” Research on
Language & Social
Interaction 43
(4): 401–426.
Keisanen, Tiina. 2012. “‘Uh-Oh,
We Were Going There’: Environmentally Occasioned Noticings
of Trouble in In-Car
Interaction.” Semiotica 191: 199–224.
Keisanen, Tiina, and Mirka Rauniomaa. 2019. “Classifying
Finds in Foraging on the Basis of (Guided) Sensory
Inspection.” Gesprächsforschung 20: 518–544.
Keisanen, Tiina, Mirka Rauniomaa, and Pauliina Siitonen. 2017. “Transitions
as Sites of Socialization in Family Interaction
Outdoors.” Learning, Culture
and Social
Interaction 14: 24–37.
Linell, Per, and Jan Lindström. 2016. “Partial
Intersubjectivity and Sufficient Understandings for Current
Practical Purposes: On a Specialized Practice in Swedish
Conversation.” Nordic Journal
of Linguistics 39
(2): 113–133.
Lundgren, Charlotte. 2017. “Ridtränares kommunikation under privatlektioner i dressyr: En samtalsanalytisk studie [The
communication of trainers in equestrian dressage: A
multimodal interaction
analysis].” Scandinavian
Sport Studies
Forum 8: 67–86.
Mondada, Lorenza. 2011. “Understanding
as an Embodied, Situated and Sequential Achievement in
Interaction.” Journal of
Pragmatics 43: 542–552.
. n.d. “Conventions
for Multimodal
Transcription.” Accessed 26
October 2020. Available at: [URL]
Mondémé, Chloe. 2016. “Extension
de la question de ‘l’ordre social’ aux interactions
hommes/animaux – une approche ethnométhodologique
[Extending
the notion of ‘social order’ to human/animal interaction. An
ethnomethodological
approach].” L’Année Sociologique 66
(2): 319–350.
. 2018. “Comment
parle-t-on aux animaux? Formes et effets pragmatiques de
l’adresse aux animaux de compagnie [How do we talk to
animals? Modes and pragmatic effects of communication with
pets].” Langage et
société 163: 77–99.
Mortensen, Kristian, and Johannes Wagner. 2019. “Inspection
Sequences – Multisensorial Inspections of Unfamiliar
Objects.” Gesprächsforschung 20: 399–343.
Mysterud, Atle, Knut Madslien, Anders Herland, Hildegunn Viljugrein, and Bjørnar Ytrehus. 2016. “Phenology
of Deer Ked (Lipoptena cervi) Host-Seeking Flight Activity
and Its Relationship with Prevailing Autumn
Weather.” Parasites &
Vectors 9: 95.
Ochs, Elinor. 1996. “Linguistic
Resources for Socializing
Humanity.” In Rethinking
Linguistic Relativity, ed.
by John J. Gumperz, and Stephen C. Levinson, 407–437. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ochs, Elinor, and Bambi B. Schieffelin. 1984. “Language
Acquisition and Socialization: Three Developmental Stories
and Their
Implications.” In Culture
Theory: Essays on Mind, Self and
Emotion, ed.
by Richard A. Shweder, and Robert A. LeVine, 276–320. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2011. “The
Theory of Language
Socialization.” In The
Handbook of Language
Socialization, ed.
by Alessandro Duranti, Elinor Ochs, and Bambi B. Schieffelin, 1–21. London: Blackwell.
Pontecorvo, Clotilde, Alessandra Fasulo, and Laura Sterponi. 2001. “Mutual
Apprentices: The Making of Parenthood and Childhood in
Family Dinner
Conversations.” Human
Development 44
(6): 340–361.
Raevaara, Liisa. 1989. “No –
vuoronalkuinen partikkeli [No – a
turn-initial
particle].” In Suomalaisen
keskustelun keinoja
I [Characteristics of Finnish
conversation I], ed.
by Auli Hakulinen, 147–161. Helsinki: Department of Finnish, University of Helsinki.
. 2017. “Adjusting
the Design of Directives to the Activity Environment.
Imperatives in Finnish Cooking Club
Interaction.” In Imperative
Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in
Action, ed.
by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 381–410. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rauniomaa, Mirka. 2017. “Assigning
Roles and Responsibilities. Finnish Imperatively Formatted
Directive Actions in a Mobile Instructional
Setting.” In Imperative
Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in
Action, ed.
by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 325–355. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rossano, Federico. 2013. “Sequence
Organization and Timing of Bonobo Mother–Infant
Interactions.” Interaction
Studies 14
(2): 160–189.
Rossano, Federico, and Katja Liebal. 2014. “‘Requests’
and ‘Offers’ in Orangutans and Human
Infants.” In Requesting
in Social Interaction, ed.
by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 335–364. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1992. “Repair
after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of
Intersubjectivity in
Conversation.” The American
Journal of Sociology 97
(5): 1295–1345.
2007. Sequence
Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation
Analysis
I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Siitonen, Pauliina, Mirka Rauniomaa, and Tiina Keisanen. 2019. “‘Kato.
Hulluna puolukoita.’ Kato vuorovaikutuksen
resurssina luontoilussa [‘Kato. An insane amount of
lingonberries.’ Kato as an interactional
resource in nature-related
activities].” Virittäjä 123
(4): 518–549.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, and Auli Hakulinen. 2009. “Alternative
Responses to
Assessments.” In Conversation
Analysis. Comparative
Perspectives, ed.
by Jack Sidnell, 280–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Virkkula, Outi. 2018. “Customer-Driven
Questioning in Finnish Forestry Advisory
Conversations.” Scandinavian
Journal of Forest
Research 33
(3): 271–277.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Auer, Peter, Barbara Laner, Martin Pfeiffer & Kerstin Botsch
2024. Noticing and assessing nature. In New Perspectives in Interactional Linguistic Research [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 36], ► pp. 245 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
