Cover not available

In:Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in language and social interaction
Edited by Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 326] 2021
► pp. 41–60

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Definitely indefinite

Negotiating intersubjective common ground in everyday interaction in Finnish

 | University of Helsinki
Published online: 17 November 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.326.03lau
Abstract
This chapter concerns expressions which seem internally contradictory because they consist of both a recognitional and a non-recognitional element. They contain both the Finnish demonstrative se ‘that, the’, a recognitional, as in se ihminen ‘that/the person’, and one of the indefinite determiners yksi ‘one’, semmonen ‘such’, and joku ‘some’, all of which are non-recognitionals, resulting in expressions such as se joku ihminen ‘that/the some person’. The chapter shows that each of these expressions has its own home environment and expresses a distinct epistemic stance. The main findings are that these expressions constitute a fine-grained resource for the negotiation of relative epistemic status and are tools for building intersubjective common ground in interaction.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background on referring and the use of referential forms in interaction
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Definite indefinites in Finnish conversation
    • 4.1Se yks in negotiations of epistemic access
    • 4.2Se semmonen in category negotiations
    • 4.3Se joku in mentions of unimportant referents
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (51)
References
Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope. 2007. “Principles of Person Reference in Tzeltal Conversation.” In Person Reference in Interaction. Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by N. J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 172–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional Linguistics. Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, Bois W. 1980. “Beyond Definiteness: The Trace of Identity in Discourse.” In The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, ed. by Wallace L. Chafe, 203–274. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J., and Tanya Stivers (eds). 2007. Person Reference in Interaction. Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erringer, Anu. 1996. “The Functions of Demonstrative Adjectives. Semmoinen, tämmöinen and tuommoinen in Finnish Conversations.” Master’s thesis. Department of Linguistics, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Etelämäki, Marja. 2005. “Context and Referent in Interaction. Referential and Indexical Dimensions of the Finnish Demonstrative Pronouns.” In Minimal Reference. The Use of Pronouns in Finnish and Estonian Discourse, ed. by Ritva Laury, 12–37. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Toiminta ja tarkoite: Tutkimus suomen pronominista tämä. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., and Barbara A. Fox. 1996. “Interactional Motivations for Reference Formulation: He had. This Guy Had, a Beautiful, Thirty-Two O:lds.” Studies in Anaphora, ed. by Barbara A. Fox, 145–168. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1892. ”Über Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift für Philosphie und philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1979. “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by G. Psathas, 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hacohen, Gonen, and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 2006. “On the Preference for Minimization in Referring to Persons: Evidence from Hebrew Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1305–1312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, William. 1990. Referential Practice. Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. “The Indexical Ground of Deictic Reference.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, ed. by Charles Goodwin, and Alessandro Duranti, 43–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Person Reference in Yucatec Maya Conversation.” In Person Reference in Interaction. Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by N. J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 149–171. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2009. ”Designing Utterances for Action: Verb Repeat Answers to Assessments.” In Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, ed. by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, and Jan Lindström, 122–151. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen, and Irja Alho. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 1988. “Subjekteina ja objekteina toimivat nominilausekkeet puhutussa suomessa.” Licentiate thesis. University of Helsinki.
Heritage, John. 2007. ”Intersubjectivity and Progressivity in Person (and Place) Reference.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by Nick Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 255–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012a. “The Epistemic Engine: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45: 30–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. “Epistemics in Conversation.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 370–394. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1990[1971]. “Shifters and Verbal Categories.” In Roman Jakobson on Language, ed. by Linda Waugh, and Monique Monville-Burston, 386–392. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language: Its Nature, Development and Origin. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juvonen, Päivi. 2005. “On the Pragmatics of Indefinite Determiners in Spoken Finnish.” In Minimal Reference. The use of Pronouns in Finnish and Estonian Discourse, ed. by Ritva Laury, 190–211. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koivisto, Aino. 2016. "Receipting information as newsworthy vs. responding to redirection: Finnish news receipts "aijaa" and "aha(a)"." Journal of Pragmatics 104: 163-179.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William, and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva. 1995. “On the Grammaticization of the Definite Article se in Spoken Finnish.” In Historical Linguistics 1993, ed. by Henning Andersen, 239–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. ”Sen kategoriasta. Onko suomessa jo artikkeli? [Regarding the category of se: does Finnish have an article yet?]” Virittäjä 100 (2): 162–181.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Definiteness.” In Grammar, Meaning and Pragmatics. Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 5, ed. by Frank Brisard, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren, 50–65. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lepäsmaa, Anna-Liisa. 1978. “Tunnettuuden ilmaisemisesta Helsingin puhekielessä.” Master’s thesis. Department of Finnish, University of Helsinki.
Lerner, Gene H. 1989. “Notes on Overlap Management in Conversation: The Case of Delayed Completion.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 53: 167–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. “On the Syntax of Sentences in Progress.” Language in Socicety 20: 441–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1955[1940]. Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. by Justus Buchler. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen 1981. “Toward a Taxonomy of Given-New Information.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 223–253. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russel, Bertrand. 1905. “On Denoting.” Mind XIV (4): 479–493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1979. “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and Their Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. “Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-Interaction: A Partial Sketch of Systematics.” In Studies in Anaphora, ed. by Barbara Fox, 437–485. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. “Shifters, Verbal Categories, and Cultural Description.” In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. by Keith H. Basso, and Henry A. Shelby, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, and Auli Hakulinen. 2009. “Alternative Responses to Assessments.” Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 281–303. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2007. “Alternative Recognitionals in Initial References to Persons.” Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by Nick Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 73–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vatanen, Anna. 2014. Responding in Overlap: Agency, Epistemicity and Social Action in Conversation. Doctoral dissertation. University of Helsinki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Delayed Completions of Unfinished Turns. On the Phenomenon and its Boundaries.” In Linking Clauses and Actions in Social Interaction, ed. by Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 153–174. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vilkuna, Maria. 1992. Referenssi ja määräisyys suomenkielisten tekstien tulkinnassa. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue