Cover not available

In:Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries
Edited by Daniël Van Olmen and Jolanta Šinkūnienė
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 325] 2021
► pp. 327–350

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 12
The diachronic origin of English I mean and German ich meine

ORCiD logo with link | University of Trier
ORCiD logo with link | University of Hamburg
Published online: 13 October 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.325.12kol
Abstract
The pragmatic markers ich meine in German and I mean in English are similar, though not equivalent, in the main aspects of their meaning and function. Both have also been widely studied, yet research on German ich meine has focused on modern data and functions. From a diachronic perspective, we investigate whether the matrix clause function, as claimed in the literature for spoken modern German, is a likely origin of the pragmatic marker or whether, as in English, a derivation from I mean followed by a phrasal complement seems more likely. Furthermore, we assess how well the origins of the pragmatic functions of I mean can be sufficiently described as constructionalization rather than grammaticalization and what role the left periphery plays in this constructionalization process.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
  • 3.I mean and ich meine in modern English and German
    • 3.1I mean in modern English
    • 3.2Ich meine in modern written and spoken German
  • 4.The diachronic development of I mean and ich mein(e)
    • 4.1The development of the pragmatic marker I mean
    • 4.2The development of the pragmatic marker ich meine
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Corpora and online dictionaries
  • References
References (60)
Corpora and online dictionaries
BNC = British National Corpus, here: Sebastian Hoffmann and Stefan Evert. BNCweb (CQP-Edition; [URL])
Bosworth-Toller = Ondrej Tichy and Martin Rocek. 2019. Bosworth-Toller Anglo-Saxon Dictionary Online. ([URL])
Cambridge Dictionary = Cambridge University Press 2020. ([URL])
COHA = Davies, Mark. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400 million words, 1810–2009. ([URL])
DOEC = Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus, compiled by Antonette diPaolo Healey with John Price Wilkin and Xin Xiang. (Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project 2009).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DWDS = DWDS (Digitales Wörterbuch der Deutschen Sprache) Kernkorpus 1900–1999 ([URL])
HiFoS = Database of the Research Unit “Historische formelhafte Sprache und Traditionen des Formulierens (HiFoS)/Diachronic Formulaic Language and Traditions of Communication.” ([URL])
Lexico = Oxford University Press 2020. Lexico. Powered by Oxford. ([URL])
MEG-C = Middle English Grammar Corpus, version 2011.1, compiled by Merja Stenroos, Martti Mäkinen, Simon Horobin, and Jeremy Smith, March 2011, University of Stavanger. ([URL])
OED = OED Online. Oxford University Press 2020. ([URL])
References
AhdGr = Althochdeutsche Grammatik. 2004. Volume I: Laut- und Formenlehre, by Wilhelm Braune, 15.th edition, ed. by Ingo Reiffenstein. Volume II: Syntax, ed. by Richard Schrodt. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. “I Think – An English Modal Particle.” In Modality in Germanic Languages, ed. by Toril Swan, and Olaf J. Westvik, 1–47. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ancient Laws and Institutes of England. Reprint 2004. Ed. by Benjamin Thorpe. Clark, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 1998. “Zwischen Parataxe und Hypotaxe: Abhängige Hauptsätzeʻ im gesprochenen und geschriebenen Deutsch.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 26: 284–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter, and Susanne Günthner. 2003. “Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen. Ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung?” InLiSt (Interaction and Linguistic Structures) 38: 1–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen. Ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung?” In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, ed. by Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans, and Sarah De Groodt, 335–362. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate. 2016a. “Alors/donc/then at the Right Periphery: Seeking Confirmation of an Inference.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (2): 208–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016b. Pragmatic Markers in British English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. “The Development of I Mean: Implications for the Study of Historical Pragmatics.” In Methods in Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Susan Fitzmaurice, and Irma Taavitsainen, 37–79. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. The Comment Clause in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2006. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, and Benjamin Fagard. 2011. “Alors between Discourse and Grammar: The Role of Syntactic Position.” Functions of Language 18 (1): 29–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. “Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions.” Linguistics 49 (2): 365–390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duden 4 = Duden Band 4. Die Grammatik. Unentbehrlich für richtiges Deutsch. 2016. 9. edition. Mannheim: Duden Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter. 1999. Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. Volume 2: Der Satz. Stuttgart: Metzler. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filatkina, Natalia. 2018. Historische formelhafte Sprache. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Herausforderungen. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox Tree, Jean E., and Josef C. Schrock. 2002. “Basic Meanings of You Know and I Mean.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (6): 727–747. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne, and Wolfgang Imo. 2003. “Die Reanalyse von Matrixsätzen als Diskursmarker: Ich mein-Konstruktionen im gesprochenen Deutsch.” InLiSt (Interaction and Linguistic Structures) 37: 1–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2011. “Discourse Marker and Modal Particle: The Functions of Utterance-Final Then in Spoken English.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (14): 3603–3623. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2011. “Was ist Konstruktionswandel?” In Konstruktionsgrammatik III. Aktuelle Fragen und Lösungsansätze, ed. by Alexander Lasch, and Alexander Ziem, 59–75. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. “Lexicalization and Grammaticalization: Opposite or Orthogonal?” In What makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, ed. by Walter Bisang, 21–44. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1991. “On Some Principles of Grammaticization.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imo Wolfgang. 2005. “A Construction Grammar Approach to the Phrase “I Mean” in Spoken English.” InLiSt (Interaction and Linguistic Structure) 42: 1–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imo, Wolfgang. 2006. “Zur Anwendung der Construction Grammar auf die gesprochene Sprache: Der Fall ‚ich mein(e)‘.” In Zugänge zur Grammatik der gesprochenen Sprache, ed. by Vilmos Ágel, and Mathilde Hennig, 3–34. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Construction Grammar und Gesprochene Sprache-Forschung: Konstruktionen mit zehn matrixsatzfähigen Verben im gesprochenen Deutsch. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. 3rd edition. Berlin: Language Science Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenker, Ursula. 2007. “Soþlice, Forsoothe, Truly: Communicative Principles and Invited Inferences in the History of Truth-intensifying Adverbs in English.” In Methods in Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Susan Fitzmaurice, and Irma Taavitsainen, 81–105. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Old English Pragmatics and Discourse.” In The History of English: Old English, ed. by Laurel Brinton, and Alexander Bergs, 140–159. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Povolná, Renata. 2009. “Interpreting Meaning in Spoken Interaction: The Case of I Mean.” In I-Mean: First International Conference on Meaning in Interaction; Conference Proceedings, ed. by Department of Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies, University of Bristol, 138–150, [URL], last accesses 30 October, 2020.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence. 1985. Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schützeichel, Rudolf. 2006. Althochdeutsches Wörterbuch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stein, Stephan. 1995. Formelhafte Sprache: Untersuchungen zu ihren pragmatischen und kognitiven Funktionen im gegenwärtigen Deutsch. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna Brita. 1995. “Some Remarks on Comment Clauses.” In The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description, ed. by Bas Aarts, and Charles F. Meyer, 290–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1988. “Grammaticalization and Semantic Bleaching.” In Berkeley Linguistics Society: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting February 13–15 General Session and Parasession on Grammaticalization, ed. by Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaiser, and Helen Singmaster, 389–405. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szczepaniak, Renata. 2011. Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Anthony Mulac. 1991a. “A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization: Types of Grammatical Markers, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 313–329. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. and Anthony Mulac. 1991b. “The Discourse Conditions for the Use of the Complementizer that in Conversational English.” Journal of Pragmatics 15: 237–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. “Subjectification in Grammaticalization.” In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation in Language, ed. by Dieter Stein, and Susan Wright, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Constructions in Grammaticalization.” In A Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ed. by Brian D. Joseph, and Richard D. Janda, 624–647. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Toward a Constructional Framework for Research on Language Change.” Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1 (1): 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme. 2014. “On the Relationship between Grammaticalization and Constructionalization.” Folia Linguistica 48 (2): 557–577. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2013. Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Olmen, Daniël. 2013. “The Imperative of Say as a Pragmatic Marker in English and Dutch.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 23 (3): 247–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ackermann, Tanja
2023. Die formale und funktionale Entwicklung vonbitte. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 51:1 ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue