Cover not available

In:Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries
Edited by Daniël Van Olmen and Jolanta Šinkūnienė
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 325] 2021
► pp. 277–300

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 10
Emoji as graphic discourse markers

Functional and positional associations in German WhatsApp® messages

ORCiD logo with link | Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
ORCiD logo with link | Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Published online: 13 October 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.325.10wie
Abstract
We investigate emoji as graphic discourse markers in German WhatsApp® messages. As comparably novel devices in the rapidly evolving domain of digital messenging, emoji provide an interesting example to observe change in progress. We present a corpus study and an experimental study. Main results are (i) an overall salience of subjective and intersubjective discourse meanings for emoji, with (ii) a general advantage for the former, especially for emoji that iconically include more active elements, while (iii) dominance relations can be modulated by left- vs. right-peripheral positions in favor of subjective vs. intersubjective meanings, respectively. By approaching emoji as discourse markers, the studies contribute to our understanding of their pragmatic contribution and provide novel evidence on positional-functional associations for pragmatic markers.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Pragmatic markers in WhatsApp® messages and the dynamics of LP/RP differences
  • 2.Emoji as graphic discourse markers
  • 3.A corpus-linguistic investigation into emoji in WhatsApp® messages
    • 3.1Empirical basis: The RUEG corpus
    • 3.2Discourse-marking emoji in WhatsApp® messages
    • 3.3Discourse contexts and functions
  • 4.The discourse interpretation of emoji: An experimental study
    • 4.1Methods
      • 4.1.1Participants
      • 4.1.2Material
      • 4.1.3Procedure
    • 4.2Results
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (52)
References
Al Rashdi, Fathiya. 2015. Forms and Functions of Emojis in WhatsApp Interaction among Omanis. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Albert, Georg. 2020. “Emojis und soziale Registrierung (enregisterment).” In Register des Graphischen, ed. by Jannis Androutsopoulos, and Florian Busch, 183–213. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2020a. “Auslassungspunkte in der schriftbasierten Interaktion.” In Register des Graphischen, ed. by Jannis Androutsopoulos, and Florian Busch, 133–158. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020b. “Digitalisierung und soziolinguistischer Wandel: Der Fall der digitalen Interpunktion.” In Deutsch in sozialen Medien. Interaktiv – multimodal – vielfältig: IDS-Jahrbuch 2019, ed. by Konstanze Marx, Henning Lobin, and Axel Schmidt, 75–94. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis, and Florian Busch (eds). 2020. Register des Graphischen: Variation, Interaktion und Reflexion in der digitalen Schriftlichkeit. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Annamalai, Subashini, and Sobihatun Nur Abdul Salam. 2017. “Undergraduates’ Interpretation on WhatsApp Smiley Emoji.” Jurnal Komunikasi, Malaysian Journal of Communication 33 (4): 89–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bai, Qiyu, Qi Dan, Zhe Mu, and Maokun Yang. 2019. “A Systematic Review of Emoji: Current Research and Future Perspectives.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 2221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate, and Ulrich Detges. 2014. “Introduction.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 1–23. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beißwenger, Michael, Marcel Fladrich, Wolfgang Imo, and Evelyn Ziegler. 2020. “Die Mobile Communication Database 2 (MoCoDa 2).” In Deutsch in sozialen Medien. Interaktiv – multimodal – vielfältig: IDS-Jahrbuch 2019, ed. by Konstanze Marx, Henning Lobin, and Axel Schmidt, 349–352. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beißwenger, Michael, and Steffen Pappert. 2019. Handeln mit Emojis: Grundriss einer Linguistik kleiner Bildzeichen in der WhatsApp Kommunikation. Duisburg: Universitätsverlag Rhein-Ruhr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bieswanger, Markus. 2013. “Micro-linguistic Structural Features of Computer-mediated Communication.” In Pragmatics of Computer Mediated Communication, ed. by Susanne Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 463–485. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 2004. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blühdorn, Hardarik, Arnulf Deppermann, Henrike Helmer, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy. 2017. Diskursmarker im Deutschen: Reflexionen und Analysen. Göttingen: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cramer, Henriette, Paloma De Juan, and Joel R. Tetreault. 2016. “Sender-intended Functions of Emojis in US Messaging.” Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI: 504–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dainas, Ashley R., and Susan C. Herring. 2021. “Interpreting Emoji Pragmatics.” In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and Practice, ed. by Chaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus, and Hartmut Haberland, 107–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company..
Danesi, Marcel. 2017. The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, and Benjamin Fagard. 2011. “Alors between Discourse and Grammar.” Functions of Language 18 (1): 29–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Detges, Ulrich, and Richard Waltereit. 2014. “Moi je ne Sais pas vs. Je ne Sais pas moi: French Disjoint Pronouns in the Left vs. Right Periphery.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 24–46. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dresner, Eli, and Susan C. Herring. 2013. “Emoticons and Illocutionary Force.” In Perspectives on Theory of Controversies and the Ethics of Communication, ed. by Dana Riesenfeld, and Giovanni Scarafile, 81–90. Basel: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dürscheid, Christa. 2020a. “Zeichen setzen im digitalen Schreiben.” In Register des Graphischen, ed. by Jannis Androutsopoulos, and Florian Busch, 31–51. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020b. “Schreiben in sozialen Medien.” In Deutsch in sozialen Medien. Interaktiv – multimodal – vielfältig: IDS-Jahrbuch 2019, ed. by Konstanze Marx, Henning Lobin, and Axel Schmidt, 35–49. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dürscheid, Christa, and Christina M. Siever. 2017. “Jenseits des Alphabets: Kommunikation mit Emojis.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 45 (2): 256–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 2006. “Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 189–204. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “An Account of Discourse Markers.” International Review of Pragmatics 1 (2): 293–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frick, Karina. 2017. Elliptische Strukturen in SMS: eine korpusbasierte Untersuchung des Schweizerdeutschen. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gawne, Lauren, and Gretchen McCulloch. 2019. “Emoji as Digital Gestures.” Language@ Internet 17 (2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glikson, Ella, Arik Cheshin, and Gerben A. van Kleef. 2017. “The Dark Side of a Smiley: Effects of Smiling Emoticons on Virtual First Impressions.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 9 (5): 614–625. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gullberg, Kajsa. 2016. Laughing Face with Tears of Joy: A Study of the Production and Interpretation of Emojis among Swedish University Students. Lund University: Centre for Languages and Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imo, Wolfgang. 2012. “Wortart Diskursmarker?” In Nichtflektierende Wortarten, ed. by Björn Rothstein, 48–88. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. “Linguistics and Poetics.” In Style and Language, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 34–45. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krause, Thomas, Ulf Leser, and Anke Lüdeling. 2016. “graphANNIS: A Fast Query Engine for Deeply Annotated Linguistic Corpora.” Corpus Linguistic Software Tools 31 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lamontagne, Jeffrey, and Gretchen McCulloch. 2017. “Wayyy Longgg: Orthotactics and Phonology in Lengthening on Twitter.” Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, Texas, January.
Ljubešić, Nikola, and Darja Fišer. 2016. “A Global Analysis of Emoji Usage.” Proceedings of the 10th Web as Corpus Workshop: 82–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marx, Konstanze, Henning Lobin, and Axel Schmidt (eds). 2020. Deutsch in sozialen Medien. Interaktiv – multimodal – vielfältig: IDS-Jahrbuch 2019. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCulloch, Gretchen. 2019. Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Na’aman, Noa, Hannah Provenza and Orion Montoya. 2017. “MojiSem: Varying Linguistic Purposes of Emoji in (Twitter) Context.” Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics – Student Research Workshop: 136–141.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pappert, Steffen. 2017. “Zu kommunikativen Funktionen von Emojis in der WhatsApp-Kommunikation.” In Empirische Erforschung internetbasierter Kommunikation, ed. by Michael Beißwenger, 175–211. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Provine, Robert, Robert Spencer, and Darcy Mandell. 2007. “Emotional Expression Online: Emoticons Punctuate Website Text Messages.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26 (3): 299–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sergeant, Philip. 2019. The Emoji Revolution: How Technology is Shaping the Future of Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siebenhaar, Beat. 2018. “Funktionen von Emojis und Altersabhängigkeit ihres Gebrauchs in der Whats-App-Kommunikation.” In Jugendsprachen: Aktuelle Perspektiven internationaler Forschung, ed. by Arne Ziegler, 749–772. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siever, Christina M. 2015. Multimodale Kommunikation im Social Web: Forschungsansätze und Analysen zu Text-Bild-Relationen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stark, Elisabeth, Simone Ueberwasser, and Anne Göhring. 2014–2020. Corpus “What’s up, Switzerland?”. Zurich: University of Zurich.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin, and Michele Poff. 2013. “Text Messaging.” In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan C. Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 163–189. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. “From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings: Some Semantic-Pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization”. In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, ed by Winfred P. Lehmann, and Yakov Malkiel, 245–271. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Revisiting Subjectification and Intersubjectification.” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Hubert Cuyckens, 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Intersubjectification and Clause Periphery.” English Text Construction 5 (1): 7–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “A Constructional Perspective on the Rise of Discourse Markers.” Paper presented at Abralin ao Vivo – Linguists Online, June. [URL]
Ueberwasser, Simone, and Elisabeth Stark. 2017. “What’s up, Switzerland? A Corpus-based Research Project in a Multilingual Country.” Linguistik Online 84 (5): 105–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walther, Joseph, and Kyle D’Addario. 2001. “The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-mediated Communication.” Social Science Computer Review 19 (3): 324–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike. 2020. “Language Situations: A Method for Capturing Variation Within Speakers’ Repertoires.” In Methods in Dialectology XVI, ed. by Yoshiyuki Asahi, 105–117. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike, Artemis Alexiadou, Shanley Allen, Oliver Bunk, Natalia Gagarina, Kateryna Iefremenko, Esther Jahns, Martin Klotz, Thomas Krause, Annika Labrenz, Anke Lüdeling, Maria Martynova, Katrin Neuhaus, Tatiana Pashkova, Vicky Rizou, Christoph Schroeder, Luka Szucsich, Rosemarie Tracy, Wintai Tsehaye, Sabine Zerbian, and Yulia Zuban. 2019. RUEG Corpus (Version 0.3.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Xie, Fang
2025. “This looks so good 😭”. Internet Pragmatics DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2025. Pragmatic Functions of Emojis. In Emoji Pragmatics, ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Zappavigna, Michele & Lorenzo Logi
2025. How emoji make meaning and enact ambient affiliation: a social semiotic account of emoji-text relations in TikTok comments. Social Semiotics 35:4 ► pp. 617 ff. DOI logo
Du Bois, Inke
2024. Age and gender differences in meme humor: a multimodal variationist mixed-method approach. Multimodal Communication 13:3 ► pp. 375 ff. DOI logo
Wiese, Heike
2023. Prozesse an der Schnittstelle von Form und Bedeutung. In Deutsche Sprache der Gegenwart, ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Labrenz, Annika, Heike Wiese, Tatiana Pashkova & Shanley Allen
2022. The three-dot sign in language contact. Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2 ► pp. 246 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue