Cover not available

In:Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries
Edited by Daniël Van Olmen and Jolanta Šinkūnienė
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 325] 2021
► pp. 251–276

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 9
Second person parentheticals of unintentional visual perception in British English

ORCiD logo with link | Lancaster University
Published online: 13 October 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.325.09van
Abstract
This chapter is the first systematic corpus-based study of parenthetical see, you see and do you see in British English. It compares (the relationship between) their clause positions and their uses. The results indicate, inter alia, that see is not simply a shorter form of you see but also that some conflation exists between the three markers. Furthermore, they confirm some of the hypothesized associations of particular functions with the left versus right clause periphery (e.g. see’s attention-getting use in clause-initial position) while challenging others (e.g. you see able to mark clauses in both their left and right periphery as explaining a previous one). The chapter also questions the notion of (inter)subjectivity’s value in the debate about peripheries and functions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Corpus data
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Distribution
    • 3.2Peripheries
    • 3.3Uses
      • 3.3.1Do you see
      • 3.3.2You see
      • 3.3.3See
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (39)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2018. “Positioning of Self in Interaction: Adolescents’ Use of Attention-getters.” In Positioning of Self and Others: Linguistic Perspectives, ed. by Kate Beeching, Chiara Ghezzi, and Piera Molinelli, 177–195. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin, and Anna Elgemark. 2013. “The Pragmatic Markers Look and Listen in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective.” In Of Butterflies and Birds, of Dialects and Genres, ed. by Nils-Lennart Johannesson, Gunnel Melchers, and Beyza Björkman, 333–348. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate, Liesbeth Degand, Ulrich Detges, Elizabeth C. Traugott, and Richard Waltereit. 2009. “Summary of the Workshop on Meaning in Diachrony.” Paper presented at the Conference on Meaning in Interaction, Bristol, April.
Beeching, Kate, and Ulrich Detges. 2014. “Introduction.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Cross-Linguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 1–23. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte, Lobke Ghesquière, and Freek Van de Velde. 2012. “Special Issue: Intersections of Intersubjectivity.” English Text Construction 5 (1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2001. “From Matrix Clause to Pragmatic Marker: The History of Look-Forms.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2 (2): 177–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolly, Catherine. 2012. “Du verbe de perception visuelle au marqueur parenthétique ‘tu vois’: Grammaticalisation et changement linguistique [From the verb of visual perception to the parenthetical marker ‘tu vois’: Grammaticalization and linguistic change].” French Language Studies 22 (2): 143–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chodorowska-Pilch, Marianna. 2008. “Verás in Peninsular Spanish as a Grammaticalized Discourse Marker Invoking Positive and Negative Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (8): 1357–1372. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crible, Ludivine. 2017. “Towards an Operational Category of Discourse Markers: A Definition and its Model.” In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles, ed. by Chiara Fedriani, and Andrea Sansò, 99–124. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuenca, Maria J., and Maria J. Marín. 2000. “Verbos de percepción gramaticalizados como conectores: Análisis contrastivo español-catalán [Verbs of perception grammaticalized as connectives: Contrastive analysis Spanish-Catalan].” Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 1: 215–237.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth. 2011. “Connectieven in de rechterperiferie: Een contrastieve analyse van dus en donc in gesproken taal [Connectives in the right periphery: A contrastive analysis of dus and donc in spoken language].” Nederlandse Taalkunde 16 (3): 333–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole, and Bettina Braun. 2013. “The Prosody of Question Tags.” English Language and Linguistics 17 (1): 129–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2004. “Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity and the Historical Construction of Interlocutor Stance: From Stance Markers to Discourse Markers.” Discourse Studies 6 (4): 427–448. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 2009. “An Account of Discourse Markers.” International Review of Pragmatics 1 (2): 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara, and Piera Molinelli. 2014. “Italian Guarda, Prego, Dai: Pragmatic Markers and the Left and Right Periphery.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 117–150. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2012. “Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity and the Negotiation of Common Ground in Spoken Discourse: Final Particles in English.” Language and Communication 32 (3): 182–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janssen, Theo A. M. 2006. “Focusconstructies als kijk eens en moet je eens kijken [Focus constructions like kijk eens and moet je eens kijken].” Nederlandse Taalkunde 11 (4): 332–365.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine, and Tania Kuteva. 2011. “On Thetical Grammar.” Studies in Language 35 (4): 848–893. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keevalik, Leelo. 2008. “Internal Development and Borrowing of Pragmatic Particles: Estonian Vaata/Vat ‘look’, Nääd ‘you see’ and Vot.” Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen 30/31: 23–54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kragh, Kirsten A. J. 2021 “Proposition d’une classification de marqueurs de discours comme membres de paradigm [Proposal of a classification of discourse markers as paradigm members].” Langue Française 201 (1): 119–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenker, Ursula. 2010. Argument and Rhetoric: Adverbial Connectors in the History of English. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Love, Robbie, Abi Hawtin, and Andrew Hardie. 2017. The British National Corpus 2014: User Manual and Reference Guide. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mišković-Luković, Mirjana. 2011. “The Marker You See: Cognitive-Pragmatic and Socio-Pragmatic Observations.” Belgrade English Language and Literature Studies 3: 49–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2014. “Subjectivity in Modality, and Beyond.” In Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts, ed. by Andrzej Zuczkowski, Ramona Bongelli, and Carla Canestrari, 13–30. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. 2007. “Interplay of (Inter)Subjectivity and Social Norm.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8 (2): 239–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ranger, Graham. 2010. “You See!” Lexis 2: 111–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez López, Cristina. 2017. “Mirativity in Spanish: The Case of the Particle Mira.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15 (2): 489–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence. 2004. “Lookit and the History of Look-Forms.” In Nihonga no Bunseki to Gengo Ruikei [Analysis of Japanese and language typology], ed. by Taro Kageyama, and Hideki Kishimoto, 543–558. Tokyo: Kuroshio Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Karla D. 2000. “Crossing Cultural Borders: ‘Girl’ and ‘Look’ as Markers of Identity in Black Women’s Language Use.” Discourse and Society 11 (2): 237–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2012. “Intersubjectification and Clause Periphery.” English Text Construction 5 (1): 7–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “On the Rise of Types of Clause-Final Pragmatic Markers in English.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (1): 26–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard. 2002. “Imperatives, Interruption in Conversation and the Rise of Discourse Markers: A Study of Italian Guarda.” Linguistics 40 (5): 987–1010. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue