Cover not available

In:Beyond Meaning
Edited by Elly Ifantidou, Louis de Saussure and Tim Wharton
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 324] 2021
► pp. 119–132

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Humorous means, serious messages

A relevance-theoretic perspective on telling jokes to communicate propositional meaning

 | University of Warsaw
Published online: 10 November 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.324.c7
Abstract
Drawing on the observation that speakers may use jokes as stylistic devices to communicate propositional meanings, this paper offers a relevance-theoretic account of pragmatic mechanisms involved in this kind of communication, dubbed ‘meaningful jokes.’ First, I argue that the comprehension of any joke not only relies on the hearer’s background knowledge, but may also lead to the modification of beliefs. Then I explore selected forms of expression which potentially bear affinity to meaningful jokes, such as fiction, metaphors, allegories, and irony. Finally, I postulate that meaningful jokes rely on a unique propositional attitude and emergent implicatures resulting from the incongruity between the joke’s scenario and a real-life situation in which it was intended to be relevant.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Understanding and enjoying jokes – a relevance-theoretic perspective
  • 3.The relevance of fiction and tropes vs. jokes
  • 4.What jokes tell us about the work of a physicist and the dangers of social media
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (38)
References
Carston, Robyn. 2010. “Metaphor: Ad hoc Concepts, Literal Meaning and Mental Images.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (3): 295‒321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn, and Catherine Wearing. 2011. “Metaphor, Hyperbole and Simile: A Pragmatic Approach.” Language and Cognition 3 (2): 283‒312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curcó, Carmen. 1995. “Some Observations on the Pragmatics of Humorous Interpretations. A Relevance-Theoretic Approach.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 27‒47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2009. “Beyond a Joke: Types of Conversational Humour.” Language and Linguistics Compass 3 (5): 1284‒1299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “When Does Irony Tickle the Hearer? Towards Capturing the Characteristics of Humorous Irony.” In Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, ed. by Marta Dynel, 289‒320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Irony, Humour and Deception. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jodłowiec, Maria. 1991. “What Makes Jokes Tick.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics3: 241‒253.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. The Challenges of Explicit and Implicit Communication. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuipers, Giselinde. 2008. “The Sociology of Humor.” In The Primer of HumorResearch, ed. by Victor Raskin, 361‒398. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, Rod. 2007. The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morreall, John. 2016. “Philosophy of Humor.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta. Accessed February 28, 2019. [URL].
Mulkay, Michael. 1988. On Humour: Its Nature and Its Place in Modern Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Ralph. 2015. “A Metaphorical Perspective on Humour.” In Cognitive Linguistics and Humor Research, ed. by Geert Brône, Kurt Feyaerts, and Tony Veale, 111‒128. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 2003. “Issues in Conversational Joking.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1333‒1359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oring, Eliott. 2003. Engaging Humor. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piskorska, Agnieszka. 2012. “Cognition and Emotions – A Joint Effort at Obtaining Positive Cognitive Effects?” In Relevance Studies in Poland, ed. by Agnieszka Piskorska, 102‒111. Vol. 4 of Essays on Language and Communication. Warsaw: WUW.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “A Relevance-Theoretic Perspective on Humorous Irony and Its Failure.” HUMOR27 (4): 661‒85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Perlocutionary Effects and Relevance Theory.” In Relevance Theory: Recent Developments, Current Challenges and Future Directions, ed. by Manuel Padilla Cruz, 287‒305. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piskorska, Agnieszka, and Maria Jodłowiec. 2018. “Weak Communication, Joke Target and the Punch-Line Effect: A Relevance-Theoretic Account.” Studies in Polish Linguistics 13 (1): 25‒44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Solska, Agnieszka. 2012. “The Relevance of the Juxtaposition of Meanings in Puns.” In Exploring Language Through Contrast, ed. by Waldemar Skrzypczak, Tomasz Fojt, and Sławomir Wacewicz, 184‒200. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. (1986) 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. “Precis of Relevance.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10: 697‒754. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “A Deflationary Account of Metaphors.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Raymond W. Gibbs, 84‒105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Beyond Speaker’s Meaning.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15 (44): 117‒149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson. 2010. “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind and Language 24 (4): 359‒393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suls, Jerry M. 1972. “A Two-Stage Model for the Appreciation of Jokes and Cartoons: An Information-Processing Analysis.” In The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues, ed. by Jeffrey H. Goldstein, and Paul E. McGhee, 81‒100. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Unger, Christoph. 2017. “Towards a Relevance-Theoretic Account of Allegory.” In Applications of Relevance Theory: From Discourse to Morphemes, ed. by Agnieszka Piskorska, and Ewa Wałaszewska, 152‒174. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim, and Claudia Strey. 2019. “Slave to the Passions: Making Emotions Relevant.” In Relevance. Pragmatics and Interpretation, ed. by Kate Scott, Billy Clark, and Robyn Carston, 253‒267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2006. “The Pragmatics of Verbal Irony: Echo or Pretence?” Lingua116: 1722‒1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Relevance Theory and Literary Interpretation.” In Reading Beyond the Code: Literature and Relevance Theory, ed. by Terrence Cave, and Deirdre Wilson, 185‒204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Robyn Carston. 2007. “Metaphor and the ‘Emergent Property’ Problem: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach.” Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 3: 1‒40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Pragmatics and the Challenge of ‘Non-propositional’ Effects.” Journal of Pragmatics 145: 31‒38. .
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2004. “Relevance Theory.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by G. Ward, and L.Horn, 607‒632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Relevance and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2003. “Humor and the Search for Relevance.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (9): 1295‒1331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “An Inference-Centered Analysis of Jokes: The Intersecting Circles Model of Humorous Communication.” In Irony and Humor: Highlights and Genres, ed. by Leonor Ruiz Gurillo, and M. Belén Alvarado Ortega, 59‒82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziv, Avner. 2009. “The Social Function of Humor in Interpersonal Relationships.” Society 47 (1):11‒18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Wieczorek, Magdalena
2025. Imperfect homophony as a source of wordplay in the sitcom Modern Family: A relevance-theoretic lexical pragmatic approach. Crossroads A Journal of English Studies :48(1) ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue