In:Beyond Meaning
Edited by Elly Ifantidou, Louis de Saussure and Tim Wharton
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 324] 2021
► pp. 79–98
Conceptual mappings and contextual assumptions
The case of poetic metaphor
Published online: 10 November 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.324.c5
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.324.c5
Abstract
This chapter is concerned with what has traditionally been considered
as ‘beyond meaning’: poetic metaphor. It specifically focuses on
poetic metaphors of time, with the aim to address anew the
relationship between pragmatic and cognitive linguistic approaches
to metaphor (cf. Tendahl and
Gibbs 2008; Wilson
2011). Such metaphors are shown to convey primarily an
affective meaning, which can be best explained in terms of affective
valence. At the level of metaphor comprehension, I argue for a
synergy between metaphor theories but with appropriate adjustments
in each framework: an extended view of encyclopedic entries for
relevance theory, and a context-sensitive process of pragmatic
inferencing for conceptual metaphor theory.
Keywords: poetic metaphor, time, affect, conceptual mappings, poetic effects
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Poetic metaphor: Cognitive linguistics vs Relevance theory
- 2.1Cognitive linguistics: From time conceptualization to metaphorical creativity
- 2.2Relevance theory: Pragmatic adjustment and poetic effects
- 3.Poetic metaphors of time and affective meaning(s)
- 4.Discussion and conclusions
Notes References
References (33)
Carston, Robyn. 2018. “Figurative
Language, Mental Imagery and
Pragmatics.” Metaphor and
Symbol 33 (3): 198‒217.
. 2010. “Metaphor:
Ad hoc Concepts, Literal Meaning and
Mental Images.” Proceedings
of the Aristotelian
Society 110: 295‒321.
Carston, Robyn, and Catherine Wearing. 2011. “Metaphor,
Hyperbole and Simile: A Pragmatic
Approach.” Language and
Cognition 3 (2): 283‒312.
Clark, Herbert H. 1973. “Space,
Time, Semantics, and the
Child.” In Cognitive
Development and the Acquisition of
Language, ed.
by Timothy E. Moore, 28‒63. New York: Academic Press.
Draaisma, Douwe. 2004. Why
Life Speeds Up as You Get Older: How Memory Shapes Our
Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2002. The
Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and The Mind’s Hidden
Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
. 2008. “Rethinking
Metaphor.” In The Cambridge
Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, ed.
by Ray Gibbs, 53‒66. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. From
Space to Time: Temporal Adverbials in the World’s
Languages. Munich: Lincom Europa.
Keeley, Edmund, and Philip Sherrard. 1992. C. P.
Cavafy: Collected
Poems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lakoff, George. 1993. “The
Contemporary Theory of
Metaphor.” In Metaphor and
Thought, 2nd
ed., ed.
by Andrew Ortony, 202‒251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More
Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic
Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, Samuel R. 1976. “Concerning
What Kind of Speech Act a Poem
Is.” In Pragmatics of
Language and Literature, ed.
by Teun A. van Dijk, 141‒160. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing.
Needham-Didsbury, Isabelle. 2016. “Interpreting
Metaphor: Perspectives from Pragmatics and
Psychotherapy.” PhD
diss.,UCL.
Núñez, Rafael, and Eve Sweetser. 2006. “With
the Future behind Them: Convergent Evidence from Aymara
Language and Gesture in the Cross-Linguistic Comparison of
Spatial Construals of
Time.” Cognitive
Science 30: 401‒450.
Pilkington, Adrian. 2000. Poetic
Effects: A Relevance Theory
Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Radden, Günter. 2006. “The
Metaphor Time as Space Across
Languages.” In Metonymy
Metaphor Collage, ed.
by Elżbieta Górska, and Günter Radden, 99‒120. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.
. 2011. “Spatial
Time in the West and the
East.” In Space and Time in
Language, ed.
by Mario Brdar, Marija Omazic, Višnja P. Takac, Tanja Gradecak-Erdeljic, and Gabrijela Buljan, 1‒40. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Scherer, Klaus R. 2005. “What
Are Emotions? And How Can They Be Measured?”
Social Science
Information 44 (4): 695‒729.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance:
Communication and Cognition. 2nd
ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
.2008. “A
Deflationary Account of
Metaphors.” In The Cambridge
Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, ed.
by Ray Gibbs, 84‒105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sullivan, Karen. 2007. “Grammar
in Metaphor: A Construction Grammar Account of Metaphoric
Language.” PhD
diss., UC Berkeley.
Tendahl, Markus. 2009. A
Hybrid Theory of Metaphor: Relevance Theory and Cognitive
Linguistics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tendahl, Markus, and Ray Gibbs. 2008. “Complementary
Perspectives on Metaphor: Cognitive Linguistics and
Relevance Theory.” Journal of
Pragmatics 40: 1823‒1864.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1978. “On
the Expression of Spatio-Temporal Relations in
Language.” In Universals of
Human
Language, vol. 3, ed.
by Joseph H. Greenberg, 369‒400. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Frühbeck Moreno, Carlos
Piata, Anna & Aristea-Maria Metaxa
2025. How many metaphors can metaphor afford?. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 194 ff.
Ifantidou, Elly & Anna Piata
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
