Cover not available

In:Questioning and Answering Practices across Contexts and Cultures
Edited by Cornelia Ilie
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 323] 2021
► pp. 35–70

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Evasive answers vs. aggressive questions

Parliamentary confrontational practices in Prime Minister’s Questions

 | Strömstad Academy
Published online: 26 July 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.323.02ili
Abstract
The goal of this investigation is to scrutinize the interplay of parliamentary questions and answers in the notoriously polarized PMQs (Prime Minister’s Questions), in terms of three pragmatic criteria: topical focus, addressed target(s), and pursued goal(s). A pragma-rhetorical analysis explores the interrelatedness between the confrontational question-asking behaviour of the Leader of the Opposition (LO) and the evasive question-answering behaviour of the Prime Minister (PM). The findings indicate that (i) the LO Jeremy Corbyn strives to hold the PM accountable not through straightforward questions, but rather by calling into question and attacking the PM Theresa May, her decisions and actions; (ii) the PM, in her turn, rather than providing straightforward answers, confronts the LO’s aggressive questions by partly or fully evading them, by rejecting the questions’ presuppositions, or by counterattacking. The interrelatedness between parliamentary questions and answers provides evidence that both MP Blackford and the PM are pursuing double agendas: on the one hand, an issue-oriented agenda with well-established political goals, and on the other, an audience-oriented agenda adjusted to presumed audience expectations.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Data and research questions
  • 2.Parliamentary questioning practices – previous studies
  • 3.Parliamentary questions: Standard or non-standard questions?
  • 4.Interrelatedness of parliamentary questions and answers
    • i.Topical focus/foci of parliamentary questions and answers
    • ii.Targets addressed by parliamentary questions
    • iii.Goals pursued by parliamentary questions and impacts on parliamentary answers
  • 5.Strategies of parliamentary questioning and answering in PMQs
  • 6.Asking and answering parliamentary questions
    • 6.1Confirmation-eliciting questions and confirming/disconfirming- or evasive answers
      • 6.1.1Confirming/disconfirming answers
      • 6.1.2Evasive and multi-purpose answers
    • 6.2Commitment-eliciting questions
      • 6.2.1Commitment-displaying answers
      • 6.2.2Evasive and multi-purpose answers
    • 6.3Action-eliciting questions
      • 6.3.1Action-eliciting question and action-endorsing answer
      • 6.3.2Action-eliciting question and fully evasive answer
      • 6.3.3Account-prompting question and partly evasive answer
  • 7.Conclusions
  • References
References (39)
References
Ameller, Michel. 1964. Les Questions, Instruments du Contrôle Parlementaire. Paris: Montecitorio.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bailer, Stefanie. 2011. “People’s Voice or Information Pool? The Role of, and Reasons for, Parliamentary Questions in the Swiss Parliament.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 17(3): 302–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, Stephen, Peter Kerr, Christopher Byrne, and Liam Stanley. 2014. “Questions to the Prime Minister: A Comparative Study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron.” Parliamentary Affairs 67(2): 253–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bercow, John. 2012. “Prime Minister’s Questions in the United Kingdom.” Canadian Parliamentary Review, 35(2): 6–9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bevan, Shaun, and Peter John. 2016. “Policy Representation by Party Leaders and Followers: What drives UK Prime Minister’s Questions?” Government and Opposition 51(1): 59–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Pam Wells. 2012. “Adversarial discourse in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31(1): 30–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, David. 2005. “Full Text of David Cameron’s Victory Speech.” The Guardian, 6 December 2005. [URL] (last accessed on 30 June 2020)
Chester, Norman, and Bowring, Nona. 1962. Questions in Parliament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coghill, Ken, and Alan Hunt. 1998. “Reforming Question Time.” Legislative Studies 12(2): 36–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dandoy, Régis. 2011. “Parliamentary Questions in Belgium: Testing for Party Discipline.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 17(3): 315–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2020. ““And I quote”: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Journal of Pragmatics 157: 89–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark N., and Philip Norton. 1993. Parliamentary Questions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giddings, Philip, and Helen Irwin. 2005. “Objects and Questions.” In The Future of Parliament: Issues for a New Century, ed. by Philip Giddings, 67–77. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra. 2001. “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 12(4): 451–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 1994. What Else Can I Tell You? A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical Questions as Discursive and Argumentative Acts. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. “Question-Response Argumentation in Talk Shows.” Journal of Pragmatics 31(8): 975–999. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015a. “Follow-ups as Multifunctional Questioning and Answering Strategies in Prime Minister’s Questions.” In The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin, 195–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. “Questions and Questioning.” In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Karen Tracy, Cornelia Ilie, and Todd Sandel, 1257–1271. Boston: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Parliamentary Discourse and Deliberative Rhetoric.” In Parliaments and Parliamentarism: A Comparative History of Disputes about a European Concept, ed. by Pasi Ihalainen, Cornelia Ilie, and Kari Palonen, 133–145. Oxford & New York: Berghahn Books. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. ”Pragmatics vs Rhetoric: Political Discourse at the Pragmatics-Rhetoric Interface.” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed. by Cornelia Ilie and Neal Norrick, 85–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jensen, Christian B., Sven-Oliver Proksch, and Jonathan B. Slapin. 2013. “Parliamentary Questions, Oversight, and National Opposition Status in the European Parliament.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 38(2): 259–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, Richard. 2015. Prime Minister’s Questions. London: House of Commons Library.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William, and Fanshell, David. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, Shane, and Rozenberg, Olivier (eds). 2012. The Roles and Function of Parliamentary Questions. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevrkla, Lukáš. 2017. “Evasion and Hedging in the Language of Parliamentary Question Time.” Linguistica Pragensia 27(2): 83–95.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norton, Philip. 1993. “Questions and the Role of Parliament.” In Parliamentary Questions, ed. by Mark N. Franklin, and Philip Norton, 194–207. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Otjes, Simon, and Tom Louwerse. 2018. “Parliamentary Questions as Strategic Party Tools.” West European Politics 41(2): 496–516. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez de Ayala, S. 2001. “FTAs and Erskine May: Conflicting Needs? – Politeness in Question Time.” Journal of Pragmatics 33(2): 143–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Jonathan B. Slapin. 2011. “Parliamentary Questions and Oversight in the European Union.” European Journal of Political Research 50(1): 53–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rasiah, Parameswary. 2007. Evasion in Australia’s Parliamentary Question Time: The Case of the Iraq War. PhD thesis. University of Western Australia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riddell, Peter. 2011. “Prime Minister’s Questions”, accessed at [URL] on 30 June 2020.
Rogers, Robert, and Rhodri Walters. 2006. How Parliament Works. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rozenberg, Olivier and Shane Martine. 2011. “Questioning Parliamentary Questions.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 17(3): 394–404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saalfeld, Thomas. 2011. “Parliamentary Questions as Instruments of Substantive Representation: Visible Minorities in the UK House of Commons, 2005–10.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 17(3): 271–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez de Dios, Manuel, and Matti Wiberg. 2011. “Questioning in European Parliaments.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 17(3): 354–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sealey, Alison, and Stephen Bates. 2006. “Prime Ministerial Self-Reported Actions in Prime Minister’s Questions 1979–2010: A Corpus-Assisted Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 104: 18–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shariatmadari, David. 2014. Comment: “Three Cheers for PMQs: It May Be Ugly. But around the World Millions Would Love to See Their Leaders Put on the Spot like Ours” (The Guardian, 27 February 2014)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiberg, Matti and Antti Koura. 1994. “The Logic of Parliamentary Questioning.” In Parliamentary Control in the Nordic Countries: Forms of Questioning and Behavioural Trends, ed. by Matti Wiberg, 19–43. Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Macagno, Fabrizio
2025. The argumentative functions of strategic questions in Portuguese parliamentary speeches. Linguistics Vanguard DOI logo
Macagno, Fabrizio
2025. Info-arguments: Dialogical Ambiguity, Argument Interpretation, and the Problem of Meaning in Argumentation. Argumentation DOI logo
Zainal Abidin, Najah, Veronica Lowe & Jariah Mohd Jan
2023. Evasion in Malaysian Parliamentary Question Time. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 31:3 ► pp. 1057 ff. DOI logo
Ilie, Cornelia
2022. How to Argue with Questions and Answers: Argumentation Strategies in Parliamentary Deliberation. Languages 7:3 ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue