Cover not available

In:The Manipulative Disguise of Truth: Tricks and threats of implicit communication
Viviana Masia
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 322] 2021
► pp. 209–222

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

References

Published online: 12 May 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.322.ref
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. “Evidentials: Their Links with Other Grammatical Categories”. Linguistic Typology 19(2): 239–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amaral, Patricia, and Chris Cummins. 2015. “A Cross-linguistic Study on Information Backgrounding and Presupposition Projection”. In Experimental perspectives on presuppositions, ed. by Florian Schwarz, 157–172. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 1997. “Locutionary and Perlocutionary Cooperation: The Perlocutionary Cooperative Principle”. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 753–779. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Nancy D., and Patricia Greenfield. 1988. “The Developement of New and Old Information in Young Children’s Early Language”. Language Sciences 10(1): 3–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baumann, Stefan, and Petra B. Schumacher. 2011. “(De-)Accentuation and the Processing of Information Status: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials”. Language & Speech 55(3): 361–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bambini, Valentina. 2010. “Neuropragmatics. A Forward”. Italian Journal of Linguistics 22(1): 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bambini, Valentina, Donatella Resta, and Mirko Grimaldi. 2014. “A Dataset of Metaphors from the Italian Literature: Exploring Psycholinguistic Variables and the Role of Context”. PLoS One 9(9): e105634. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baixauli, Inmaculada, Ana Miranda, Carmen Berenguer, and Belén Rosello. 2017. “Pragmatic Competence of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Impact of Theory of Mind, Verbal Working Memory, ADHD Symptoms, and Structural Language”. Applied Neurophysiology 8(1): 1–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Evaluation in Media Discourse. Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. New York/London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bekalu, Mesfin A. 2006. “Presupposition in News Discourse.” Discourse & Society 17(2): 147–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano. 1976. La semantica. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchi, Claudia. 2003. Pragmatica del linguaggio. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 2008. “The Language of Critical Discourse Analysis: The Case of Nominalization”. Discourse and Society 19(6): 783–800. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloom, Paul. 2000. How Children Learn the Meanings of Words. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1900. “Sketch of the Kwakiutl language”. American Anthropologist 2: 708–721. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1910. Kwakiutl. An Illustrative Sketch. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonini, Nicolao, Daniel Osherson, Riccardo Viale, and Timothy Williamson. 1999. “On the Psychology of Vague Predicates”. Mind & Language 14(4): 377–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. 1974. A Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bredart, Stacy, and Karin Modolo. 1988. “Moses Strikes Again: Focalization Effect on a Semantic Illusion”. Acta Psychologica 67: 135–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brocca, Nicola, Davide Garassino, and Viviana Masia. 2016. “Politici nella rete o nella rete dei politici? L’implicito nella comunicazione politica italiana su Twitter”. PhiN-Beiheft 11: 66–79.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brocca, Nicola, Ewa A. Borowiec, and Viviana Masia. 2020. “Didactics of Pragmatics as a Way to Improve Social Media Literacy. An Experiment Proposal with Polish and Italian Students in L1”. heiEDUCATION Journal 5: 81–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals of Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity and Interaction. A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach”. Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 585–614. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burmester, Juliane, Katharina Spalek, and Isabell Wartenburger. 2014. “Context Updating During Sentence Comprehension: The Effect of Aboutness Topic”. Brain and Language 137: 62–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2016. The Language of Fear. Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. UK: Palgrave Millan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cerezuela-Pastor, Gemma, Juan C. Yllescas Tordera, Francisco González-Sala, Maite Montagut-Asunción, and María-Inmaculada Fernández-Andrés. 2018. “Comprehension of Generalized Conversational Implicatures by Children with or without Autism Spectrum Disorder”. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. “Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Point of view”. In Subject and topic, ed. by Charles Li, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace, and Joanna Nichols. 1986. (eds.). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chemla, Emmanuel. 2009. “Similarity: Towards a Unified Account of Scalar Implicatures, Free Choice Permission and Presupposition Projection”. Under revision for Semantics and Pragmatics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christianson, Kiel, Andrew Hollingworth, John F. Halliwell, and Fernanda Ferreira. 2001. “Themaic Roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger”. Cognitive Psychology 42: 368–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1977. “The Movement Nature of Left Dislocation”. Linguistic Inquiry 8(2): 397–423.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coolidge, Frederick L., and Thomas Wynn. 2012. “Cognitive Prerequisites for the Evolution of Indirect Speech”. In The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution, ed. by Kathleen R. Gibson, and Maggie Tallerman. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coppola, Claudia. 2018. Analisi etnopragmatica dell’agentività in discorsi istituzionali di politici italiani e della sua interpretazione in tedesco. MA Thesis, Università degli Studi Internazionali di Roma.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cory, Bill, Jacopo Romoli, Florian Schwarz, and Stephen Crain. 2014. “Scalar Implicatures vs. Presuppositions: The View from Acquisition.” Topoi 35(1): 57–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cotter, Colleen. 2010. News Talk: Investigating the Language of Journalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowles, Heidi W., Robert Kluender, Marta Kutas, and Maria Polinsky. 2007. “Violations of Information Structure: An Electrophysiological Study of Answers to Wh-questions.” Brain and Language 102(3): 228–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela. 2000. Corpus di italiano parlato. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “The Illocution-Prosody Relationship and the Information Pattern in Spontaneous Speech According to the Language into Act Theory (L-AcT).” Linguistik Online 88: 33–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daneš, František. 1974. “Functional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text.” In Papers on functional sentence perspective, ed. by František Daneš, 106–128. Prague: Academia/The Hague. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danler, Paul. 2005. “Morpho-Syntactic and Textual Realizations as Deliberate Pragmatic Argumentative Linguistic Tools?” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. Discourse, language, mind, ed. by Louis de Saussure, and Peter Schulz, 45–60. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dayter, Daria. 2014. “Self-Praise in Micro-Blogging.” Journal of Pragmatics 61: 91–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio. 1982. Minisemantica dei linguaggi non verbali e delle lingue. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derrick, Deirdre J. 2017. “Is Comprehending Text the Same as Learning from Text?” Arizona Working Papers in Second Language Acquisition and Teaching 24: 52–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Domaneschi, Filippo, Paolo Canal, Viviana Masia, Edoardo Lombardi Vallauri, and Valentina Bambini. 2018. “N400 and P600 Modulation in Presupposition Accommodation: The Effect of Different Trigger Types.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 45: 13–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drai, Nathanaël, and Louis de Saussure. 2016. “When the Implicit Becomes Explicit: From Experimental Accident to Pilot Study.” Syntaxe et Sémantique 17(1): 115–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degen, Judith, and Michael K. Tanenhaus. 2015. “Processing Scalar Implicature: A Constraint-Based Approach.” Cognitive Science 39: 667–710. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1972. Dire et ne pas dire. Principes de sémantique linguistique. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erickson, Thomas D., and Matthew E. Mattson. 1981. “From Words to Meaning. A Semantic Illusion.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20(5): 540–551. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Ash. 2016. “Stance and Identity in Twitter Hashtags.” Language@Internet urn:nbn:de:0009-0-54947.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faller, Martina T. 2002. Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Department of Linguistics: University of Stanford, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farahzad, F. and Allameh, T. (1999). A Gestalt Approach to Manipulation. Museum Tusculanum Press University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farwell, David, and Stephen Helmreich. 1999. “Pragmatics and Translation.” Paper available at: [URL]
Ferreira, Fernanda, Karl G. D. Bailey, and Vittoria Ferraro. 2002. “Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 11(1): 11–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferreira, Fernanda, and Matthew W. Lowder. 2016. “Prediction, Information Structure, and Good-Enough Language Processing.” Psychology of Learning and Motivation 65: 217–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fintel von, Kai. 2008. What is Presupposition Accommodation, Again? Philosophical Perspectives 22(1): 137–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frith, Chris D., and Uta Frith. 2005. “Theory of Mind.” Advances in Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation 15: R644–6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News. Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. 2001. “Evidentiality, Authority, Responsibility and Entitlement in English Conversation.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(2): 167–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franke, Michael, and Robert van Rooij. 2015. “Strategies of Persuasion, Manipulation and Propaganda. Psychological and Social Aspects.” Models of Strategic Reasoning: Logics, Games, and Communities, 255–291. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara, and Roland Hinterhölzl. 2007. “Types of Topics in German and Italian.” On Information Structure, Meaning and Form: 87–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1892. “Über Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie un philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 1986. “Evidentiality in the Balkans. Macedonian and Albanian.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Joanna Nichols, 168–187. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frith, Chris D., and Uta Frith. 2005. “Theory of Mind.” Advances in Clinical Neuroscience & Rehabilitation 15: R644–6.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaio, Silvia. 2010. Vaghezza. APhEx. Portale Italiano di Filosofia Analitica 1: 75–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garassino, Davide, Viviana Masia, and Nicola Brocca. 2018. “Implicit Communication in Twitter. Analysis of the Pragmatic Functions of Politicians’ Use of Implicatures and Presuppositions.” Talk presented at the ARGAGE (Argumentation and Language) conference, 7–9 October, 2018.
. 2019. “Tweet as You Speak. The Role of Implicit Strategies and Pragmatic Functions in Political Communication: Data From a Diamesic Comparison.” Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata 2–3: 187–208.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1982. “Evidentiality and Epistemic Space.” Studies in Language 6(1): 23–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study. [Typological Studies in Language 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Bio-linguistics. The Santa Barbara Lectures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gotzner, Nicole. 2019. “The Role of Focus Intonation in Implicature Computation: a Comparison With Only and Also.” Natural Language Semantics 27: 189–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen J., and Elisabeth S. Vrba. 1982. “Exaptation. A Missing Term in the Science of Form.” Paleobiology 8(1): 4–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gouvea, Ana C., Colin Phillips, Nina Kazanina, and David Poeppel. 2010. “The Linguistic Processes Underlying the P600.” Language and Cognitive Processes 25(2): 149–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabe, William. 2009. Reading in a Second Language. Moving from Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Todd, Marcel Broersma, Karin Hazelhoff, and Guido van t’Haar. 2013. “Between Broadcasting Political Messages and Interacting with Voters: The Use of Twitter During the 2010 UK General Election Campaign.” Information, Communication & Society 16(5): 692–716. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert P. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1978. “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 9. Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 113–128. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grottanelli Vinigi, Lorenzo. 1966. Ethnologica. L’uomo e la civiltà. Vol. III. Milano: Edizioni Labor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutt, Ernst-A. 1991. Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hagoort, Peter, Colin Brown, and Jolanda Groothusen. 1993. “The Syntactic Positive Shift (SPS) as an ERP Measure of Syntactic Processing.” Language and Cognitive Processes 8(4): 439–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hagoort, Peter, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2014. “Neuropragmatics.” In The Cognitive Neurosciences, ed. by Michael S. Gazzaniga, and George R. Mangun, 667–674. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haro, Juan, Josep Demestre, Roger Boada, and Pilar Ferré. 2017. “ERP and Behavioral Effects of Semantic Ambiguity in a Lexical Decision Task.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 44: 190–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. University of Massachussetts: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hintz, Daniel J., and Diane M. Hintz. 2017. “The Evidential Category of Mutual Knowledge in Quechua.” Lingua (186–187): 88–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 1999. “Persuasive Rhetoric in Linguistics: A Styilistic Study of Some Features of the Language of Noam Chomsky.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, 28–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornby, Peter A. 1974. “Surface Structure and Presupposition.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13(5): 530–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hruska, Claudia, and Kai Alter. 2004. “Prosody in Dialogues and Single Sentences. How Prosody Can Influence Speech Perception.” In Language, Context and Cognition. Information Structure: Theoretical and Empirical Aspects, ed. by Anita Steube, 211–223. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson. 1999. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Thompson, Geoff. (2001). Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda. 1995. Irony’s Edge. The Theory and Politics of Irony. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Peter E., and Chik Collins. 2006. “Political Analysis versus Critical Discourse Analysis in the Treatment of Ideology: Some Implications for the Study of Communication.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 14 (1–2): 28–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Julia, George A. Miller, and Dan Sperber. 1984. “Test of the Mention Theory of Irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 113: 112–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio. 1997. Territory of Information. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kapogianni, Eleni. 2016. “The Ironic Operation: Revisiting the Components of Ironic Meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics 91: 16–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kappenman, Emily S., and Steven J. Luck. 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1973. “Presupposition of Compound Sentences.” Linguistic Inquiry 4(2): 169–193.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. “Presupposition and Linguistic Context.” Theoretical Linguistics 1(1): 181–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasher, Asa, Gila Batori, Nachum Soroker, David Graves, and Eran Zaidel. 1999. “Effects of Right- and Left-Hemisphere Damage on Understanding Conversational Implicatures.” Brain and Language 68: 566–590. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katan, David. 1999. Translating Cultures: An Introduction for Translators, Interpreters and Mediators. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keefe, Rosanna. 2000. Theories of Vagueness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1978. “Some Logical Problems in Translation.” In Meaning and Translation: Philosophical and Linguistic Approaches, ed. by Franz Guenthner, and Reutter M. Guenthner, 157–89. Duckworth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. 1972 [1944]. Training in Christianity. And the Edifying Discourse that Accompanied it [translated by Walter D. D. Lowrie]. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Carol, and Paul Kiparsky. 1971. “Fact.” In Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader, ed. by Danny D. Steinberg, and Leon A. Jakobovitz, 345–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kramina, Aiga. 2004. “Translation as Manipulation: Causes and Consequences, Opinions and Attitudes.” Studies about Languages 6: 37–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krebs, John R., and Richard Dawkins. 1984. “Animal Signals: Mind-reading and Manipulation.” In Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, ed. by John R. Krebs, and Nicholas B. Davies, 380–402. Sunderland: MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kutas, Marta, and Steven A. Hillyard. 1980. “Reading Senseless Sentences: Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Incongruity.” Science 207: 203–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kutas, Marta, and Kara D. Federmeier. 2000. “Electrophysiology Reveals Semantic Memory Use in Language Comprehension.” Trends in Cognitive Science 4(12): 463–470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Thirty Years and Counting: Finding Meaning in the N400 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP).” Annual Review of Psychology 62: 621–647. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kutas, Marta, Katherine A. De Long, and Nathaniel J. Smith. 2011. “A Look Around at What Lies Ahead: Prediction and Predictability in Language Processing.” In Predictions in the Brain. Using Our Past to Generate a Future, ed. by Moshe Bar, 190–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langford, John, and Virginia M. Holmes. 1979. “Syntactic Presupposition in Sentence Comprehension.” Cognition 7: 363–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
La Rocca, Daria, Viviana Masia, Emanuele Maiorana, Edoardo Lombardi Vallauri, and Patrizio Campisi. 2016. “Brain Response to Information Structure Misalignments in Linguistic Contexts.” Neurocomputing 199: 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazer, David, Matthew Baum, Yochai Benkler, Adam Berinsky, Kelly Greenhill, Filippo Menczer, Miriam Metzger, Brendan Nyhan, Gordon Pennycook, David Rothschild, Michael Schudson, Steven Sloman, Cass Sunstein, Emily Thorson, Duncan Watts, and Jonathan Zittrain. 2018. “The Science of Fake News. Addressig Fake News Requires a Multidisciplinary Effort.” Science 359 (6380): 2–4.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Jayeon, and Weiai Xu. 2018. “The More Attacks, the More Retweets: Trump’s and Clinton’s Agenda Setting on Twitter.” Public Relations Review 44(2): 201–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levy, Roger. 2008. “Expectation-Based Syntactic Comprehension.” Cognition 106(3): 1126–1177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1979. “Scorekeeping in a Language Game.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8(3): 339–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, Fiona M., Gail C. Woodyatt, and Bruce E. Murdoch. 2008. “Linguistic and Pragmatic Language Skills in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Pilot Study.” Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 2(1): 176–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Charles, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1976. “Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language.” In Subject and Topic, ed. by Charles Li, 455–488. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Libert, Alan R. 2016. “Adpositions and Presuppositions.” SpringerPlus 5: 858. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loftus, Elizabeth F. 1975. “Leading Questions and the Eyewitness Report.” Cognitive Psychology 7: 560–572. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo. 2009. La struttura informativa. Forma e funzione negli enunciati linguistici. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Implicits as Evolved Persuaders.” In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use, ed. by Keith Allan, Alessandro Capone, and Istvan Kecskes, 725–748. Springer: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Topics are (Implicit) Indirect Reports.” In Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages. Perspectives in Pragmatics vol. 19, Philosophy & Psychology, ed. by Alessandro Capone, Manuel García-Carpintero, and Alessandra Falzone, 149–170. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo, and Viviana Masia. 2014. “Implicitness Impact: Measuring Texts.” Journal of Pragmatics 61: 161–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016a. “Misurare l’informazione implicita nella propaganda politica italiana.” In Proceedings of XI° ASLI Congress – Associazione per la Storia della Lingua Italiana, L’italiano della politica e la politica per l’italiano, 539–557. Firenze: Franco Cesati.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016b. Specificità della lingua persuasiva: l’implicito discutibile. In Proceedings of XIII° SILFI Congress, La lingua variabile nei testi letterari, artistici e funzionali contemporanei (1915–2014): analisi, interpretazione, traduzione, 637–654. Firenze: Franco Cesati.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Context and Information Structure constraints on factivity: the case of “know”. Language Sciences 66: 103–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “La comunicazione implicita come dimensione di variazione tra tipi testuali.” In Linguaggi settoriali e specialistici. Sincronia, diacronia, traduzione, variazione, ed. by Jaqueline Visconti, Manuela Manfredini, and Lorenzo Coveri, 113–120. Firenze: Franco Cesati.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucisano, Pietro, and Maria Emanuela Piemontese. 1988. “GULPEASE: una formula per la predizione della difficoltà dei testi in lingua italiana.” Scuola e città 3(31): 110–124.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Machetti, Sabrina. 2011. “La vaghezza linguistica come problema della pragmatica. Questioni teoriche e dati a confronto.” Esercizi Filosofici 6: 195–213.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maclellan, Effie. 1997. “Reading to Learn.” Studies in Higher Education 22(3): 277–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maillat, Didier, and Steve Oswald. 2009. “Defining Manipulative Discourse: The Pragmatics of Cognitive Illusions.” International Review of Pragmatics 1: 348–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice, and Danah boyd. 2011. “To See and Be Seen: Celebrity Practice on Twitter.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 17: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masia, Viviana. (2017). Sociobiological Bases of Information Structure. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017b. “On the Evidential Status of Presupposition and Assertion.” International Journal of Linguistics 9(4): 134–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017c. “A Sociobiological Account of Indirect Speech.” Interaction Studies 18(1): 142–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masia, Viviana, Paolo Canal, Irene Ricci, Edoardo Lombardi Vallauri, and Valentina Bambini. 2017. “Presupposition of New Information as a Pragmatic Garden Path: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 42: 31–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masia, Viviana. 2020. “(Re-)assessing the Status of Second Occurrence Focus in Information Structure: Evidence from Phonological, Processing and Micropragmatic Perspectives.” Italian Journal of Linguistics 32(2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “Presupposition, Assertion and the Encoding of Evidentiality in Political Discourse.” Linguistik Online 102(2): 129–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masini, Francesca, Caterina Mauri, and Paola Pietrandrea. 2018. “List Constructions: Towards a Unified Account.” Italian Journal of Linguistics 30(1): 49–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mathesius, Vilèm. 1939. “On the So-Called Topic/Comment articulation of the sentence.” SaS 5: 171–174.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matić, Dejan. 2014. “Deriving Information Structure from Field Data.” In Methodological Issues in the Study of Information Structure, ed. by Dina El Zarka, and Steffen Heidinger, 25–42. Graz: Universität Graz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzarella, Diana, Robert Reinecke, Ira Noveck, and Hugo Mercier. 2018. “Saying, Presupposing and Implicating: How Pragmatics Modulates Commitment.” Journal of Pragmatics 133: 15–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg. 2014. “A Truth That’s Told with Bad Intent. Lying and Implicit Content.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28(1): 97–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morency, Patrick, Steve Oswald and Louis de Saussure. 2008. “Explicitness, Implicitness and Commitment Attribution: A Cognitive Pragmatic Approach.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22: 197–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, Sarah E. 2017. The Semantics of Evidentials. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, Shaun, and Stephen P. Stich. 2003. Mindreading. An Integrated Account of Pretence, Self-Awareness, and Understanding Other Minds. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noveck, Ira A. 2001. “Why Children are More Logical than Adults: Experimental Investigations of Scalar Implicatures.” Cognition 78: 165–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noveck, Ira A., and Andres Posada. 2003. “Characterizing the Time Course of an Implicature. An Evoked Potentials Study.” Brain and Language 85: 203–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oesch, Nathan. 2016. “Deception as a Derived Function of Language.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohta, Amy S. 1991. Evidentiality and Politeness in Japanese. Issues in Applied Linguistics 2(2): 211–238.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oswald, Steve, Didier Maillat, and Louis de Saussure. 2016. “Deceptive and Uncooperative Communication.” In Verbal Communication (Handbooks of Communicative Science 3), ed. by Louis de Saussure, and Andrea Rocci, 509–534. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paganini, Elisa. 2011. “Vague Objects Without Onticate Indeterminate Identity.” Erkenntnis 74: 351–362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parvaresh, Vahid, and Mohammad Ahmadian Javad. 2016. “The Impact of Task Structure on the Use of Vague Expressions by EFL Learners.” The Language Learning Journal 44(4): 436–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfurtscheller, Gert, and Fernando Lopes da Silva. 1999. “Event-Related EEG/MEG Synchronization and Desynchronization: Basic Principles.” Clinical Neurophysiology 110: 1842–1857. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo. 1995. L’arte di persuadere. Come impararla, come esercitarla, come difendersene. Milano: Mondadori.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piciucco, Emanuela, Viviana Masia, Emanuele Maiorana, Edoardo Lombardi Vallauri, and Patrizio Campisi. under review. “Information Structure Effects on the Processing of Nouns and Verbs: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials.”
Pijnaker, Judith, Peter Hagoort, Jan Buitelaar, Jan-Pieter Teunisse, and Bart Geurts. 2009. “Pragmatic Inferences in High-Functioning Adults with Austism and Asperger Syndrome.” Journal of Autism Development and Disorder 39: 607–618. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 2007. “The Evolutionary Social Psychology of Off-Record Indirect Speech Acts.” Intercultural Pragmatics 4–4: 437–461. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven, Martin A. Nowak, and James J. Lee. 2008. “The Logic of Indirect Speech.” PNAS 105(3): 833–838. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Politzer-Ahles, Stephen, and Laura Gwilliams Laura. 2015. “Involvement of Prefrontal Cortex in Scalar Implicatures: Evidence from Magnetoencephalography.” Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30(7): 853–866. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popa-Wyatt, Mihaela. 2019. “Embedding Irony and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.” Inquiry 62(6): 674–699. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rabassa, G. (1984). The Silk Purse Business: A Translator’s Conflicting Responsibilities. In Frawley, W. (ed.) Translation: Literary, Linguistic and Philosophical Perspectives. Newark: University of Delaware Press. pp. 35–40Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reboul, Anne. 2011. “A Relevance-Theoretic Account of the Evolution of Implicit Communication.” Studies in Pragmatics 13(1): 1–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Récanati, François. 1987. Meaning and Force. The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Regel, Stefanie, Thomas C. Gunter, and Angela D. Friederici. 2011. “Isn’t it Ironic? An Electrophysiological Exploration of Figurative Language Processing.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(2): 277–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1982. “Pragmatics and Linguistics. An Analysis of Sentence Topics.” Philosophica 27(1): 53–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renvoisé, Patrick, and Christophe Morin. 2007. Neuromarketing. Understanding the “Buy Botton” in Your Customer’s Brain. Nashville: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo. 2005. “Towards a Typology of Manipulative Processes.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. Discourse, language and mind, ed. by Louis de Saussure, and Peter Schulz, 61–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. “Principles of Categorization.” In Cognition and Categorization, ed. by Eleanor Rosch, and Barbara B. Lloyd, 27–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1905. “On denoting.” Mind 14(56): 479–493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanatifar, Mohammad S. 2016. “How to Treat Implicatures in the Translation of Political Speech: A Relevance-theory Perspective.” Journal of Translator Education and Translation Studies 1(2): 97–114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santos, Diana. 1998. “The Relevance of Vagueness for Translation: Examples from English to Portuguese.” TradTerm 5(1): 71–98.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saussure de, Louis. 2005. “Manipulation and Cognitive Pragmatics: Preliminary Hypotheses.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind, ed. by Louis de Saussure, and Peter Schulz, 113–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Discourse Analysis, Cognition and Evidentials.” Discourse Studies 13(6): 781–788. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saussure de, Louis. 2018. “The Strawman Fallacy as a Prestige-Gaining Device.” In Argumentation and Language – Linguistic, Cognitive and Discourse Explorations. Argumentation Library 32, ed. by Steve Oswald et al., 171–190. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Des présuppositions stricto sensu aux présuppositions discursives.” La Présupposition entre théorisation et mise en discours: 35–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 1999. “Ideology and the Persuasive Use of Presupposition.” In Language and Ideology. Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatic Conference Vol. 1, ed. by Jef Verschueren, 492–509. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Detto non detto. Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scarpa, Federica. 2008. La traduzione specializzata. Milano: Hoepli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schaeken, Walter, Marie Van Haeren, and Valentina Bambini. 2018. “The Understanding of Scalar Implicatures in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Dichotomized Responses to Violations of Informativeness.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schumacher, Petra B. 2012. “Context in Neurolinguistics: Time-Course Data From Electrophysiology.” In What is a context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges, ed. by Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer, and Petra B. Schumacher, 33–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schumacher, Petra B., and Yu-Chen Hung. 2012. “Positional Influences on Information Packaging: Insights From Topological Fields in German.” Journal of Memory and Language 67(2): 295–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarz, Florian, and Sonja Tiemann. 2015. “Presupposition Projection in Online Processing.” Available at: [URL]
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay on the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1985. “Intonation, Stress and Meaning.” Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 491–504.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shapiro, Stewart, and Eric Snyder. 2016. “Vagueness and Context.” Inquiry. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59(4): 343–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shiffrin, Richard M., and Walter Schneider. 1984. “Theoretical Note: Automatic and Controlled Processing Revisited.” Psychological Review 91(2): 269–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaele, and Edoardo Lombardi Vallauri. 2011. “Natural Constraints on Language: The Ergonomics of the Software.” Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 64: 119–141.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simons, Mandy. 2001. “On the Conversational Basis of Some Presuppositions.” In Proceedings of SALT XI, ed. by Rachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson, and Zsofia Zvolensky, 431–448. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skopeteas, Stavros, Ines Fiedler, Sam Hellmuth, Anne Schwarz, Ruben Stoel, Ginsbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, and Manfred Krifka. 2006. Questionnaire on Information Structure (ISIS, Vol. 4), Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorensen, Roy A. (1991). Fictional Incompleteness as Vagueness. Erkenntnis, 34, 55–72.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson. 2010. “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind & Language 25: 359–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spychalska, Maria, Jarmo Kontinen, and Markus Werning. 2014. “Electrophysiology of Pragmatic Processing: Exploring the Processing Cost of the Scalar Implicature in the Truth-Value Judgment Task.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 36(36): 1497–1502.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert C. 1973. “Presuppositions.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 447–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1974. “Pragmatic Presuppositions.” In Semantics and Philosophy, ed. by Munitz K. Milton, and Unger K. Peter, 471–482. New York: University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. Context and content: Essays on intentionality in speech and thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. “Common Ground.” Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Surian, Luca, and Michael Siegal. 2008. “Language and Communication in Autism and Asperger Syndrome.” In Handbook of Neuroscience of Language, ed. by Brigitte Stemmer, and Harry A. Whitaker, 377–385. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweller, John. 2003. “Evolution of Human Cognitive Architecture.” Psychology of Learning and Motivation 43: 215–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tavano, Erin, and Elsi Kaiser. 2010. “Processing Scalar Implicature: What Can Individual Differences Tell Us?” Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium 16(1): 215–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 1985. “Grammar and Written Discourse: Initial vs. Final Purpose Clauses in English.” Text 5(1/2): 55–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2008. Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. (1988). News as discourse. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1988a. News Analysis: Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. Hillsdale: NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1988b. News as Discourse. Hillsdale: NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Sandt, Rob A. 1992. “Presupposition Projection as Anaphora.” Journal of Semantics 9: 333–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 1997. “What is Political Discourse Analysis?” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11(1): 11–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse & Society 17(2): 359–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2009. “News, Discourse and Ideology.” In The Handbook of Journalism Studies, ed. by Karin Wahl-Jorgensen, and Thomas Hanitzsch, 191–204. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Tiel, Bob, and Walter Schaeken. 2017. “Processing Conversational Implicature: Alternatives and Counterfactual Reasoning.” Cognitive Science 41: 1119–1154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varzi, Achille C. 2001. Parole, oggetti, eventi ed altri argomenti di metafisica. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. “Higher-Order Vagueness and the Vagueness of “Vague”. Mind 112: 295–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vleugel, Thijs. 2014. “Meaning Irony: The Ethics of Irony.” Frame 16/2: 1–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Luming, and Petra B. Schumacher. 2013. “New is Not Always Costly: Evidence from Online Processing of Topic and Contrast in Japanese.” Frontiers in Psychology 4: 363. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 1994. Vagueness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2006. “The Pragmatics of Verbal Irony: Echo or Pretence?” Lingua 116: 1722–1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winner, Ellen. 1988. The Point of Words. Children’s Understanding of Metaphor and Irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zurawicki, Leon. 2010. Neuromarketing. Exploring the Brain of the Consumer. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue