Cover not available

In:How Emotions Are Made in Talk
Edited by Jessica S. Robles and Ann Weatherall
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 321] 2021
► pp. 189–210

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 3.1
Responding empathically from shifting epistemic terrains

ORCiD logo with link | University of Sheffield
ORCiD logo with link | Rutgers University
Published online: 12 May 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.321.07for
Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to explore empathy as an interactional (rather than internal psychological) phenomenon across a range of settings, both mundane and institutional. Building upon earlier research, we first establish a working definition of empathic utterances as those which make a claim about another person’s mental or emotional state that is contingent upon that person’s confirmation (e.g. It’s frustrating isn’t it?). We then proceed to explore a series of such utterances drawn from a call between two sisters, a child protection helpline, a doctor-patient palliative care interaction, and an emotion-focused therapy session. This comparative approach shows that, while our initial definition of empathy remains consistent across these settings, the epistemic implications, role, and design of empathy differ between them.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Empathy practices in interaction
  • 3.Methods
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Defining empathy
    • 4.2Empathic responses to upset in different environments
    • 4.3Empathy in palliative care: Orientations to epistemic access
    • 4.4Empathy in emotion-focused therapy
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (42)
References
Beach, Wayne A., and C. N. Dixson. 2001. “Revealing Moments: Formulating Understandings of Adverse Experiences in a Health Appraisal Interview.” Social Science and Medicine 52 (1): 25–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coplan, Amy, and Peter Goldie, eds. 2011. Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2014. “Visible Deflation: Embodiment and Emotion in Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 47 (4): 380–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek, and Jonathan Potter. 2017. “Some Uses of Subject-Side Assessments.” Discourse Studies 19 (5): 497–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Joseph. “Empathy in Doctor-Patient Palliative Care Consultations: A Conversation Analytic Approach.” PhD thesis, Loughborough University, 2017. [URL]
Ford, Joseph, Alexa Hepburn, and Ruth Parry. 2019. “What Do Displays of Empathy Do in Palliative Care Consultations?” Discourse Studies 21 (1): 22–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gladstein, Gerald A. 1984. “The Historical Roots of Contemporary Empathy Research.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 20 (1): 38–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Charles Goodwin. 2000. “Emotion Within Situated Activity.” In Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 239–257. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa. 2004. “Crying: Notes on Description, Transcription, and Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (3): 251–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa, and Jonathan Potter. 2007. “Crying Receipts: Time, Empathy, and Institutional Practice.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 40 (1): 89–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Interrogating Tears: Some Uses of ‘Tag Questions’ in a Child Protection Helpline.” In Why Do You Ask? The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. by Alice Freed, and Susan Ehrlich, 69–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Crying and Crying Responses.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Lee Sorjonen, 195–211. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2011. “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Anna Lindström. 2012. “Knowledge, Empathy, and Emotion in a Medical Encounter.” Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Lee Sorjonen, 256–273. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie R. 1979. “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology 85 (3): 551–575. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. The Managed heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling (20th Anniversary Edition). London: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jahoda, Gustav. 2005. “Theodor Lipps and the Shift from “Sympathy” to “Empathy.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 41 (2): 151–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1988. “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Ordinary Conversation.” Social Problems 35 (4): 418–441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kitzinger, Celia. 2011. “Working with Childbirth Helplines: The Contributions and Limitations of Conversation Analysis.” In Applied Conversation Analysis: Intervention and Change in Institutional Talk, ed. by Charles Antaki, 98–118. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kupetz, Maxi. 2014. “Empathy Displays as Interactional Achievements – Multimodal and Sequential Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics. 61: 4–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuroshima, Satomi, and Natsuho Iwata. 2016. “On Displaying Empathy: Dilemma, Category, and Experience.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (2): 92–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, Bert S. 1990. “The Origins and Development of Empathy.” Motivation and Emotion 14 (2): 75–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, John. “Talk in Mind: The Analysis of Calls to a Mental Health Information Line.” PhD thesis, Loughborough University, 2009. [URL]
Muntigl, Peter, and Adam O. Horvath. 2014. ““I Can See Some Sadness in Your Eyes”: When Experiential Therapists Notice a Client’s Affectual Display.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 47 (2): 89–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muntigl, Peter, Naomi Knight, and Ashley Watkins. 2014. “Empathic Practices in Client-Centred Psychotherapies: Displaying Understanding and Affiliation with Clients.” In Discourses of Helping Professions, ed. by Eva-Maria Graf, Marlene Sator, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy, 33–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pino, Marco, Ruth Parry, Victoria Land, Christina Faull, Luke Feathers, and Jane Seymour. 2016. “Engaging Terminally Ill Patients in End of Life Talk: How Experienced Palliative Medicine Doctors Navigate the Dilemma of Promoting Discussions about Dying.” PLOS One 11 (5): e0156174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pudlinski, Christopher. 2005. “Doing Empathy and Sympathy: Caring Responses to Troubles Tellings on a Peer Support Line.” Discourse Studies 7 (3): 267–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rogers, Carl. 1975. “Empathic: An Unappreciated Way of Being.” The Counseling Psychologist 5 (2): 2–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruusuvuori, Johanna. 2005. ““Empathy” and “Sympathy” in Action: Attending to Patients’ Troubles in Finnish Homeopathic and General Practice Consultations.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (3): 204–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Managing Affect: Integration of Empathy and Problem-Solving in Health Care Encounters.” Discourse Studies 9 (5): 597–622. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverman, David, and Anssi Peräkylä. 1990. “AIDS Counselling: The Interactional Organisation of Talk About “Delicate” Issues.” Sociology of Health and Illness 12 (3): 293–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smoliak, Olga, Clare MacMartin, Amanda LeCouteur, Alexa Hepburn and Robert Elliott. In press. “Authority in Therapeutic Interaction: A Conversation Analytic Study.” Journal of Marital and Family Therapy.
Strayer, Janet. 1990. “Affective and Cognitive Perspectives on Empathy.” In Empathy and Its Development, ed. by Nancy Eisenberg and Janet Strayer, 218–244. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suchman, Anthony L., Kathryn Markakis, Howard B. Beckman, and Richard Frankel. 1997. “A model of empathic communication in the medical interview.” JAMA 277 (8): 678–682. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voutilainen, Liisa, Anssi Peräkylä, and Johanna Ruusuvuori. 2010. “Misalignment as a Therapeutic Resource.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 7 (4), 299–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voutilainen, Liisa. 2012. “Responding to Emotion in Cognitive Psychotherapy.” Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Lee Sorjonen, 235–255. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weatherall, Ann, and Maria Stubbe. 2015. “Emotions in Action: Telephone-Mediated Dispute Resolution.” British Journal of Social Psychology 54 (2): 273–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weiste, Elina, and Anssi Peräkylä. 2014. “Prosody and Empathic Communication in Psychotherapy Interaction.” Psychotherapy Research 24 (6): 687–701. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wispé, Lauren. 1986. “The Distinction Between Sympathy and Empathy: To Call Forth a Concept, a Word is Needed.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (2): 314–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wynn, Rolf, and Michael Wynn. 2006. “Empathy as an Interactionally Achieved Phenomenon in Psychotherapy.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (9): 1385–1397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Muntigl, Peter, Lynda Chubak & Lynne Angus
2023.  Responding to In-the-Moment Distress in Emotion-Focused Therapy . Research on Language and Social Interaction 56:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Muntigl, Peter & Adam O. Horvath
2023. Strategic use of observer-perspective questions in couples therapy. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Muntigl, Peter & Claudio Scarvaglieri
2023. Discursive angles on the relationship in psychotherapy. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
van Braak, Marije, Sven P. C. Schaepkens, Elise van Dolder, Luna K. Dral, Zoey van der Horst, Daan B. Houben & Emma E. Mees
2023. What affects you? A conversation analysis of exploring emotions during reflection sessions in Dutch general practitioner training. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue