In:How Emotions Are Made in Talk
Edited by Jessica S. Robles and Ann Weatherall
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 321] 2021
► pp. 129–162
Chapter 2.2Shared affective stance displays as preliminary to complaining
Published online: 12 May 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.321.05ruu
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.321.05ruu
Abstract
In this chapter, we examine how vocal and non-vocal affective displays are enacted in concert when moving into the delicate action of complaining. We specifically analyze complaining about third parties in the institutional situation of performance appraisal interviews. Reciprocal affective displays contribute to the organization of the activity of complaining, specifically, to the building of joint understanding in relation to the appropriateness of complaining activity and the relevancy of affiliating with complaining. To finish, we discuss the role of affective displays as managing social relational aspects of institutional interaction, with some methodological problems of analyzing emotion in interaction.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data and method
- 3.Analysis
- 3.1Reaching shared affective stance
- 3.2Lack of shared affective stance
- 4.Discussion
References
References (47)
Aggerholm, Helle Kryger, Mona Agerholm Andersen, Birte Asmuß, and Christa Thomsen. 2009. “Management Conversations in Danish Companies: Communicating Corporate Values and Strategies.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal 14(3): 264–279.
Asmuß, Birte. 2013. “The Emergence of Symmetries and Asymmetries in Performance Appraisal Interviews: An Interactional Perspective.” Economic and Industrial Democracy 34(3): 553–570.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2009. “A Sequential Approach to Affect: The Case of ‘Disappointment’.” In Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, 94–123. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
. 2012. “Exploring Affiliation in the Reception of Conversational Complaint Stories.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 113–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drew, Paul. 1998. “Complaints About Transgressions and Misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3–4): 295–325.
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Holt. 1988. “Complainable Matters: The Use of Idiomatic Expressions in Making Complaints.” Social Problems 35(4): 298–417.
Drew, Paul, and Traci Walker. 2009. “Going too Far: Complaining, Escalating and Disaffiliation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(12): 2400–2414.
Edwards, Derek. 2005. “Moaning, Whinging and Laughing: The Subjective Side of Complaints.” Discourse Studies 7(1): 5–29.
Goffman, Erving. 1961. “Fun in Games.” In Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction, ed. by Erving Goffman, 17–84. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Goodwin, Marjorie H., Asta Cekaite, and Charles Goodwin. 2012. “Emotion as Stance.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 16–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Charles Goodwin. 2000. “Emotion within Situated Activity.” In Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 239–257. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja R. Heinonen, and Irja Alho. 2004. Iso Suomen Kielioppi [The big grammar of Finland]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura [Finnish Literature Society].
Heath, Christian, Dirk vom Lehn, Jason Cleverly, and Paul Luff. 2012. “Revealing Surprise: The Local Ecology and the Transposition of Action.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 212–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heinemann, Trine, and Véronique Traverso. 2009. “Complaining in Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(12): 2381–2384.
Hepburn, Alexa, and Galina Bolden. 2013. “The Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 57–76. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hepburn, Alexa, and Jonathan Potter. 2012. “Crying and Crying Responses.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 195–211. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2011. “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Interaction, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1): 15–38.
Holt, Elizabeth. 2012. “Using Laugh Responses to Defuse Complaints.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(4): 430–448.
Jefferson, Gail. 1988. ”On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Conversation.” Social Problems 35(4): 418–441.
Jefferson, Gail, and John R. Lee. 1992. “The Rejection of Advice: Managing the Problematic Convergence of a ‘Troubles-telling’ and a ‘Service Encounter’.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 521–548. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaukomaa, Timo, Anssi Peräkylä, and Johanna Ruusuvuori. 2013. ”Turn-Opening Smiles: Facial Expression Constructing Emotional Transition in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 55: 21–42.
. 2014. ”Foreshadowing a Problem: Turn-opening Frowns in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 71: 132–147.
. 2015. ”How Listeners Use Facial Expression to Shift the Emotional Stance of the Speaker’s Utterance.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48(3): 319–341.
Lindström, Anna, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2013. ”Affiliation in Conversation.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 350–369. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Maynard, Douglas W., and Jeremy Freese. 2012. “Good News, Bad News, and Affect: Practical and Temporal ‘Emotion Work’ in Everyday Life.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 92–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mondada, Lorenza. 2013. “Embodied and Spatial Resources for Turn-taking in Institutional Multi-party Interactions: Participatory Democracy Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics 46(1): 39–68.
Monzoni, Chiara M. 2009. “Direct Complaints in (Italian) Calls to the Ambulance: The Use of Negatively Framed Questions.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(12): 2465–2478.
Peräkylä, Anssi. 2012. “Epilogue. What Does the Study of Interaction Offer to Emotion Research?” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 274–289. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peräkylä, Anssi, and Johanna Ruusuvuori. 2012. “Facial Expression and Interactional Regulation of Emotion.” In: Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 64–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ruusuvuori, Johanna. 2005. “’Empathy’ and ‘Sympathy’ in Action: Attending to Patients’ Troubles in Finnish Homeopathic and General Practice Consultations.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68(3): 204–222.
. 2012. ”Emotion, Affect and Conversation.” In: The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 330–349. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ruusuvuori, Johanna, and Anssi Peräkylä. 2009. ”Facial and Verbal Expressions in Assessing Stories and Topics.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42(4): 377–394.
Ruusuvuori, Johanna, and Pirjo Lindfors. 2009. ”Complaining about Previous Treatment in Health Care Settings.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(12): 2415–2434.
Ruusuvuori, Johanna, Birte Asmuß, Pentti Henttonen, and Niklas Ravaja. 2019. ”Complaining about Others at Work.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 52(1): 41–62.
Salminen, Mikko, Pentti Henttonen, and Niklas Ravaja. 2011. Todellisen ja Arvioidun Tunneosaamisen Yhteys Menestykselliseen Johtamiseen [The Correlation between Real and Estimated Emotional Competence]. Helsinki: Aalto-yliopisto.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 2001. Responding in Conversation. A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, and Anssi Peräkylä. 2012. ”Introduction.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 274–289. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Steensig, Jakob, Trine Heinemann, and Anna Lindström. 2011. “Addressing Epistemic Incongruence in Question-answer Sequences through the Use of Epistemic Adverbs.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 107–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. “Stance, Alignment and Affiliation during Story Telling: When Nodding is a Token of Preliminary Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41: 29–55.
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig (eds). 2011. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilkinson, Sue, and Celia Kitzinger. 2006. “Surprise as an Interactional Achievement: Reaction Tokens in Conversation.” Social Psychology Quarterly 69(2): 150–182.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
