Cover not available

In:The Politics of Person Reference: Third-person forms in English, German, and French
Naomi Truan
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 320] 2021
► pp. 255–275

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Bibliography

Published online: 12 October 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.320.refs
Abbott, Barbara. (2010). Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adegoju, Adeyemi. (2014). Person Deixis as Discursive Practice in Nigeria’s “June 12” Confl Rhetoric. In: Ghana Journal of Linguistics 3.1, pp. 45–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adetunji, Akinbiyi. (2006). Inclusion and Exclusion in Political Discourse: Deixis in Olusegun Obasanjo’s Speeches. In: Journal of Language and Linguistics 5.2, pp. 177–191.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijón, Oliva Miguel A. (2019). Constructing Us. The First and Second Persons in Spanish Media Discourse. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexander, Marc and Mark Davies. (2015). Hansard Corpus 1803–2005.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexandre-Collier, Agnès. (2015). Euroscepticism under Margaret Thatcher and David Cameron: From Theory to Practice. In: Observatoire de la société britannique 17, pp. 115–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allan, Keith. (2010). Referring as a Pragmatic Act. In: Journal of Pragmatics 42.11, pp. 2919–2931. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Common Ground. In: Handbook of Pragmatics. Ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allan, Keith and Kate Burridge. (2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, Wendy. (2007). Australian Political Discourse: Pronominal Choice in Campaign Speeches. In: Selected Papers from the 2006 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. Ed. by Mary Mushin and Ilana Laughren. Brisbane, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amossy, Ruth. (2002). Double adresse et auditoire composite dans le discours électoral. Du clip au débat télévisé. In: La double adresse. Ed. by Jürgen Siess and Gisèle Valency. Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 41–54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Kristin J. and Campbell Leaper. (1998). Meta-Analyses of Gender Effects on Conversational Interruption: Who, What, When, Where, and How. In: Sex Roles 39.3–4, pp. 225–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersson, Carina and Coco Norén. (2010). Comparer la finalité dans le débat parlementaire : l’apport du corpus bilingue C-ParlEur. In: Cahiers Sens public 13–14.1, pp. 35–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles and Ivan Leudar. (2001). Recruiting the Record: Using Opponents Exact Words in Parliamentary Argumentation. In: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 21.4, pp. 467–488. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arbach, Najib and Saandia Ali. (2013). Aspects théoriques et méthodologiques de la représentativité des corpus. In: Corela. Cognition, représentation, langage HS-13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Armengaud, Françoise. (1981). L’impertinence ex-communicative ou comment annuler la parole d’autrui. In: Degrés 26–27, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arter, David. (1999). Scandinavian Politics Today. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. (2000). Irony as Relevant Inappropriateness. In: Journal of Pragmatics 32.6, pp. 793–826. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auel, Katrin and Tapio Raunio. (2014). Debating the State of the Union? Comparing Parliamentary Debates on EU Issues in Finland, France, Germany and the United Kingdom. In: The Journal of Legislative Studies 20.1, pp. 13–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bächtiger, André. (2014). Debate and Deliberation in Legislatures. In: The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Ed. by Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–166.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Keith Michael. (1990). Au tribunal de l’opinion. Essais sur l’imaginaire politique au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, Andrew Hardie, and Tony McEnery. (2006). A Glossary of Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul et al.. (2008). A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press. In: Discourse & Society 19.3, pp. 273–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhaïl. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Ed. by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Trans. by Vern McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbaresi, Adrien. (2012). German Political Speeches – Corpus and Visualization. In: DGfS-CL Poster Session.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barker, Chris. (2006). Vagueness. In: Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. Ed. by Keith Brown. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 294–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barry, Alpha Ousmane. (2002). Pouvoir du discours & discours du pouvoir : l’art oratoire chez Sékou Touré de 1958 à 1984. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar. (2003). Concession in Spoken English: On the Realisation of a Discourse-Pragmatic Relation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Base Textuelle FRANTEXT, ATILF – CNRS & Université de Lorraine (Version December 2016).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baumann, Gerd. (1992). Ritual Implicates ‘Others’: Rereading Durkheim in a Plural Society. In: Understanding Rituals. Ed. by Daniel de Coppet. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 97–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayley, Paul, ed. (2004a). Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004b). Introduction. The Whys and Wherefores of Analysing Parliamentary Discourse. In: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Ed. by Paul Bayley. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla. (2011). Indeterminacy in Dialogue. In: Language and Dialogue 1.1, pp. 21–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. (1984). Language Style as Audience Design. In: Language in Society 13.2, pp. 145–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1991a). Audience Accommodation in the Mass Media. In: Contexts of Accommodation. Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Ed. by Howard Giles, Justine Coupland, and Nikolas Coupland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1991b). The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benninger, Céline and Anne Theissen. (2000). L’anaphore pronominale in absentia : le cas de certains . In: Verbum XXII.4, pp. 347–362.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale. Volume I. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. ([1966] 1971). Problems in General Linguistics. Coral Gables, Florida: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertuccelli Papi, Marcella. (1999). Implicitness. In: Handbook of Pragmatics Online. Ed. by Jef Verschueren et al. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bevitori, Cinzia. (2004). Negotiating Confl Interruptions in British and Italian Parliamentary Debates. In: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Ed. by Paul Bayley. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 87–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhat, Darbhe Narayana Shankara. (2004). Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. (1988). Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bilmes, Jack. (1997). Being Interrupted. In: Language in Society 26.4, pp. 507–531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José-Luis. (2000). Mire Usted Sr. González… Personal Deixis in Spanish Political-Electoral Debate. In: Journal of Pragmatics 32.1, pp. 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blasco-Dulbecco, Mylène and Paul Cappeau. (2012). Identifier et caractériser un genre : l’exemple des interviews politiques. In: Langages 187.3, pp. 27–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. (2001). Context is/as Critique. In: Critique of Anthropology 21.1, pp. 13–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Discourse. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. (1987). Indirectness or Politness in Requests: Same or Different? In: Journal of Pragmatics 11.2, pp. 131–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonnafous, Simone and Dominique Desmarchelier. (1999). Quand les députés coupent le ’RESEDA’. In: Mots. Les langages du politique 60.1, pp. 93–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis. (1995). The Semantics of Syntax. A Minimalist Approach to Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boukala, Salomi. (2016). Rethinking Topos in the Discourse Historical Approach: Endoxon Seeking and Argumentation in Greek Media Discourses on ’Islamist Terrorism’. In: Discourse Studies 18.3, pp. 249–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brauer, Markus and Michaël Landry. (2008). Un ministre peut-il tomber enceinte ? L’impact du générique masculin sur les représentations mentales. In: L’Année psychologique 108.2, pp. 243–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian and George Yule. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. (1978). Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena. In: Questions and Politeness Strategies in Social Interaction. Ed. by Ester N. Goody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–311.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1987). Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bull, Peter and Anita Fetzer. (2006). Who Are We and Who Are You? The Strategic Use of Forms of Address in Political Interviews. In: Text 26.1, pp. 3–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burger, Harald. (1991). Das Gespräch in den Massenmedien. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burkhardt, Armin. (2003). Das Parlament und seine Sprache. Studien zu Theorie und Geschichte parlamentarischer Kommunikation. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). Zwischen Monolog und Dialog. Zur Theorie, Typologie und Geschichte des Zwischenrufs im deutschen Parlamentarismus. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burkhardt, Armin and Kornelia Pape, eds. (2000). Sprache des deutschen Parlamentarismus. Studien zu 150 Jahren parlamentarischer Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burnard, Lou. (2014). What Is the Text Encoding Initiative? How to Add Intelligent Markup to Digital Resources. Marseille: OpenEdition Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Button, Graham and Neil Casey. (1988). Topic Initiation: Business-at-hand. In: Research on Language & Social Interaction 22.1–4, pp. 61–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buyssens, Eric. (1956). The Category of Person in Language. In: Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire 34.2, pp. 442–444.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cabasino, Francesca. (2001). Formes et enjeux du débat public. Discours parlementaire et immigration. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah and Sylvia Shaw. (2016). Gender, Power and Political Speech. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capone, Alessandro. (2010). Barack Obama’s South Carolina Speech. In: Journal of Pragmatics 42.11, pp. 2964–2977. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capt, Vincent, Jérôme Jacquin, and Raphaël Micheli. (2009). Les sphères de contextualisation. Réflexion méthodologique sur les passages de texte à texte(s) et la constitution des corpus. In: Corpus 8, pp. 129–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cartoni, Bruno, Sandrine Zufferey, and Thomas Meyer. (2013). Using the Europarl Corpus for Cross-Linguistic Research. In: Belgian Journal of Linguistics 27, pp. 23–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. (1986). Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing. In: Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Ed. by Wallace L. Chafe and Johanna Nichols. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 261–272.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. and Johanna Nichols. (1986). Introduction. In: Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Ed. by Wallace L. Chafe and Johanna Nichols. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. vi–xi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chandler, Daniel. (1997). An Introduction to Genre Theory. [URL] (4 April, 2017).
Channell, Joanna. (1994). Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2000). Corpus-Based Analysis of Evaluative Lexis. In: Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoffrey Thompson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 38–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charaudeau, Patrick and Rosa Montes, eds. (2004). La voix cachée du tiers. Des non-dits du discours. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. (2011). Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie and Anne O’Keeffe. (2015). Vagueness. In: Corpus Pragmatics. A Handbook. Ed. by Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 360–378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie and Martin Warren. (2003). Indirectness, Inexplicitness and Vagueness Made Clearer. In: Pragmatics 13.3, pp. 381–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chiarcos, Christian, Berry Claus, and Michael Grabski. (2011). Introduction: Salience in Linguistics and Beyond. In: Salience: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Its Function in Discourse. Ed. by Christian Chiarcos, Berry Claus, and Michael Grabski. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah. (2004). A Feminised Style of Politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons. In: The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 6.1, pp. 3–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. (2003). Manipulation. In: Handbook of Pragmatics. Ed. by Jef Verschueren et al. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Metaphors in Political Discourse. In: Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (Second Edition). Ed. by Keith Brown, pp. 63–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. and Susan E. Brennan. (1991). Grounding in Communication. In: Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Ed. by Lauren Resnick et al. American Psychological Association, pp. 13–1991. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. and Thomas B. Carlson. (1982). Hearers and Speech Acts. In: Language 58.2, pp. 332–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. and Richard J. Gerrig. (1990). Quotations as Demonstrations. In: Language 66.4, pp. 764–805. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. (2007). Speaking on Behalf of the Public in Broadcast News Interviews. In: Reporting Talk. Reported Speech in Interaction. Ed. by Elizabeth Holt and Rebecca Clift. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 221–243.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Constantin de Chanay, Hugues and Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni. (2017). Regard et deixis personnelle : l’adresse dans les débats d’entre-deux-tours des élections présidentielles françaises. In: Langue française 193, pp. 93–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cotteret, Jean-Marie, Jacques Gerstlé, and René Moreau. (1976). Giscard d’Estaing-Mitterrand : 54 774 mots pour convaincre. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cotterill, Janet. (2007). ‘I Think He Was Kind of Shouting or Something’: Uses and Abuses of Vagueness in the British Courtroom. In: Vague Language Explored. Ed. by Joan Cutting. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 97–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cramer, Jennifer. (2010). ‘Do We Really Want to Be like Them?’: Indexing Europeanness through Pronominal Use. In: Discourse & Society 21.6, pp. 619–637. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cribb, V. Michael and Shivani Rochford. (2018). The Transcription and Representation of Spoken Political Discourse in the UK House of Commons. In: International Journal of English Linguistics 8.2, p. 1. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David and Derek Davy. (1975). Advanced Conversational English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutting, Joan. (2000). Analysing the Language of Discourse Communities. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, ed. (2007). Vague Language Explored. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. (2007). Building Semantic Maps: The Case of Person Marking. In: New Challenges in Typology. Ed. by Bernhard Wälchli and Matti Miestamo. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 225–247.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cock, Barbara. (2005). Spain, Portugal and Europe in Spanish International Relations Discourse: A Linguistic Approach to Group and Identity Construction. In: Portugal y España En La Europa Del Siglo XX. Ed. by Michel Dumoulin, Díaz Ventura, and Antonio Díaz. Yuste: Fundación Academia Europea de Yuste, pp. 279–300.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014a). Profiling Discourse Participants. Forms and Functions in Spanish Conversation and Debates. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014b). The Discursive Effects of Spanish Uno and Se. A Case Study of the Phenomena of Speaker Inclusion and Female-Only Reference. In: Subjectivity and Epistemicity. Corpus, Discourse and Literary Approaches to Stance.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Fina, Anna. (1995). Pronominal Choice, Identity, and Solidarity in Political Discourse. In: Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 15.3, pp. 379–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delaveau, Annie. (1998). QUI ? Un pronom indéfini. In: Linx. Revue des linguistes de l’université Paris X Nanterre 39, pp. 71–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delettres, Cécile. (2015). La sémantique des quantificateurs vagues. Etude contrastive allemand-français. Thèse de doctorat non publiée. Paris: Université Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delmonte, Rodolfo. (2008). A Computational Approach to Implicit Entities and Events in Text and Discourse. In: International Journal of Speech Technology 11.3–4, pp. 195–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dettenwanger, Sarah. (2013). Witnesses on Trial: Address and Referring Terms in US Cases. In: Exploring Courtroom Discourse. The Language of Power and Control. Ed. by Anne Wagner and Le Cheng. Surrey: Ashgate, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dines, Elizabeth R. (1980). Variation in Discourse – “and Stuff like That”. In: Language in Society 9.1, pp. 13–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diwersy, Sascha, Francesca Frontini, and Giancarlo Luxardo. (2018). The Parliamentary Debates as a Resource for the Textometric Study of the French Political Discourse. In: Proceedings of the ParlaCLARIN@ LREC2018 Workshop. Miyazaki, p. 6.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dolný, Branislav. (2011). Possible Application of Deliberative Democracy in Parliament. In: Human Affairs 21.4, pp. 422–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dostal, Jörg Michael. (2000). From ’Moderniser’ to ’Traditionalist’: Oskar Lafontaine and German Social Democracy in the 1990s. In: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 8.1, pp. 23–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. (1992). Contested Evidence in Courtroom Cross-Examination: The Case of a Trial for Rape. In: Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings. Ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 470–520.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dubois, Betty Lou. (1987). “Something on the Order of around Forty to Forty-Four”: Imprecise Numerical Expressions in Biomedical Slide Talks. In: Language in Society 16.4, pp. 527–541. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. (1980a). Analyse de textes et linguistique de l’énonciation. In: Les mots du discours. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, pp. 7–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1980b). Les Mots Du Discours. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001). Quelques raisons de distinguer « locuteurs » et « énonciateurs ». In: Polyphonie – linguistique et littéraire 3, pp. 19–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. (2010). Not Hearing Things – Hearer/Listener Categories in Polylogues. In: mediAzioni 9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Two Communicative Levels and Twofold Illocutionary Force in Televised Political Debates. In: Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 47.2, pp. 283–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). On the Part of Ratified Participants: Ratified Listeners in Multi-Party Interactions. In: Brno Studies in English 40.1, pp. 27–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2016). Pejoration via Sarcastic Irony and Sarcasm. In: Pejoration. Ed. by Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer, and Heike Wiese. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 219–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta and Piotr Cap. (2017). Implicitness. Familiar Terra Incognita in Pragmatics. In: Implicitness. From Lexis to Discourse. Ed. by Piotr Cap and Marta Dynel. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Susan. (2012). Text Trajectories, Legal Discourse and Gendered Inequalities. In: Applied Linguistics Review 3.1, pp. 47–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Eric. (1984). Ambiguity as Strategy in Organizational Communication. In: Communication Monographs 51.3, pp. 227–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Eric M. (2006). Strategic Ambiguities: Essays on Communication, Organization, and Identity. Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: SAGE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter. (2013). Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. Band 2: Der Satz. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erskine May, Thomas. (1844). Erskine May. A Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament. London: Charles Knight & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan. (1976). Is Sybil There? The Structure of Some American English Directives. In: Language in Society 5.1, pp. 25–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falk, Erika. (2009). Gender Bias and Maintenance. Press Coverage of Senator Hillary Clinton’s Announcement to Seek the White House. In: Gender and Political Communication in America: Rhetoric, Representation, and Display. Ed. by Janis L. Edwards. Lanham; Boulder; New York; Toronto; Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books, pp. 219–231.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farenkia, Bernard Mulo. (2011). Formes d’adresse et argumentation : analyse d’un corpus camerounais. In: Actes du Colloque « Autour du verbe ». Ed. by Béatrice Akissi Boutin. Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis: Revue du Réseau des Observatoires du Français Contemporain en Afrique, pp. 243–262.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. (2008). “And I Think That Is a Very Straightforward Way of Dealing With It”: The Communicative Function of Cognitive Verbs in Political Discourse. In: Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27.4, pp. 384–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Contexts in Context: Micro Meets Macro. In: Discourses in Interaction. Ed. by Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen et al. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 13–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). “Judge Us on What We Do”: The Strategic Use of Collective We in British Political Discourse. In: Constructing Collectivity. ’We’ across Languages and Contexts. Ed. by Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 331–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feuillet, Jack. (2005). Typologie des oppositions de personne. In: Linguistique typologique. Ed. by Gilbert Lazard and Claire Moyse-Faurie. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, pp. 19–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forchheimer, Paul. (1953). The Category of Person in Language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, Winthrop Nelson and Henry Kučera. (1982). Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardey, Delphine. (2010). Scriptes de la démocratie : les sténographes et rédacteurs des débats (1848–2005). In: Sociologie du Travail 52.2, pp. 195–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garside, Roger, Geoffrey Sampson, and Geoffrey N. Leech. (1987). The Computational Analysis of English. A Corpus-Based Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gastil, John. (1992). Undemocratic Discourse: A Review of Theory and Research on Political Discourse. In: Discourse & Society 3.4, pp. 469–500. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald. (1979). Pragmatics. Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York/San Francisco/London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geis, Michael L. (1987). The Language of Politics. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelabert, Jaime. (2004). Pronominal and Spatio-Temporal Deixis in Contemporary Spanish Political Discourse: A Corpus-Based Pragmatic Analysis. PhD Thesis. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Cornelia, Volker Eisenlauer, and Maximiliane Frobenius. (2014). Participation Framework Revisited: (New) Media and Their Audiences/Users. In: Journal of Pragmatics 72, pp. 1–4. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghadessy, Mohsen, Alex Henry, and Robert L. Roseberry, eds. (2001). Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilbert, Eric. (2005). SOME et la construction d’une occurrence. In: Cycnos 16.2.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel. (1997). Understanding Figurative and Literal Language: The Graded Salience Hypothesis. In: Cognitive Linguistics 8.3, pp. 183–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2003). On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giroul, Vincent and Anne-Catherine Simon. (2000). L’« ex-communication » interactionnelle comme stratégie de dévalorisation de l’idéologie. In: Politesse et idéologie. Rencontres de pragmatique et de rhétorique conversationnelles. Ed. by Michel Wauthion and Anne-Catherine Simon. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters, pp. 185–196.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gondret, Pierre. (1976). « Quelques », « plusieurs », « certains », « divers » : Etude sémantique. In: Le français moderne XLIV.2, pp. 143–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grainger, Karen and Sara Mills. (2016). Directness and Indirectness Across Cultures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David. (1992). On the Management of Disagreement between News Interviewees. In: Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings. Ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 268–301.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In: Syntax and Semantics. Volume 3. Speech Acts. Ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Genres in Political Discourse: The Case of the ‘Inaugural Speech’ of Austrian Chancellors. In: Analyzing Genres in Political Communication. Theory and Practice. Ed. by Piotr Cap and Urszula Okulska. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 29–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grundy, Peter. (2000). Doing Pragmatics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guilhaumou, Jacques and Denise Maldidier. (1986). De l’énonciation à l’événement discursif en analyse de discours. In: Histoire Épistémologie Langage 8.2, pp. 233–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guiziou, Marie-Claire Durand. (1992). L’implicite dans le discours. In: El Guiniguada 3, pp. 203–210.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, John Joseph. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gunkel, Lutz et al., eds. (2017). Grammatik des Deutschen im europäischen Vergleich. Das Nominal. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gunlicks, Arthur B. (2003). The Länder and German Federalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haberland (1986). Reported Speech in Danish. In: Direct and Indirect Speech. Ed. by Florian Coulmas. Berlin/New York/Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 219–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. (1962). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Neuwied/Berlin: Luchterhand.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Kathleen Thelen. (2009). Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism. In: Socio-Economic Review 7.1, pp. 7–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood and Ruqaiya Hasan. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra. (2001). Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse. In: Discourse & Society 12.4, pp. 451–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heiden, Serge, Jean-Philippe Magué, and Bénédicte Pincemin. (2010). TXM : Une plateforme logicielle open-source pour la textométrie-conception et développement. In: 10th International Conference on the Statistical Analysis of Textual Data-JADT 2010. Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto, pp. 1021–1032.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helincks, Kris. (2015). Negotiation of Terms of Address in a Chilean Television Talk Show. In: Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 92.7, pp. 731–752. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helmbrecht, Johannes. (2015). A Typology of Non-Prototypical Uses of Personal Pronouns: Synchrony and Diachrony. In: Journal of Pragmatics 88, pp. 176–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. (1985). Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an “Overhearing” Audience. In: Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Ed. by Teun Adrianus van Dijk. London: Academic Press, pp. 95–119.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heurtin, Jean-Philippe. (1999). L’espace public parlementaire. Essai sur les raisons du législateur. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirsch, Galia. (2017). Who Is the Victim? When the Addresser of the Echoed Utterance and the Target of the Irony Differ. In: Text & Talk 37.2. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hitzler, Ronald. (1990). Die Politik des Zwischenrufs: zu einer kleinen parlamentarischen Form. In: Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 21.4, pp. 619–630.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. and Istvan Kecskes. (2013). Pragmatics, Discourse and Cognition. In: The Language-Cognition Interface. Ed. by Stephen R. Anderson, Jacques Moeschler, and Fabienne Reboul. Genève/Paris: Librairie Droz, pp. 353–375.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. (1984). Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum, eds. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. (1991). The Organisation of Talk on Talk Radio. In: Broadcast Talk. Ed. by Paddy Scannell. London: SAGE, pp. 119–137.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell Hathaway. (1972). Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life. In: Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. Ed. by John Joseph Gumperz and Dell Hathaway Hymes. New York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston, pp. 35–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ihalainen, Pasi, Cornelia Ilie, and Kari Palonen, eds. (2016). Parliament and Parliamentarism. A Comparative History of a European Concept. New York/Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. (2001). Unparliamentary Language. Insults as Cognitive Forms of Ideological Confrontation. In: Language and Ideology. Descriptive Cognitive Approaches. Ed. by René Dirven, Roslyn M. Frank, and Cornelia Ilie. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 235–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). Insulting as (Un)Parliamentary Practice in the British and Swedish Parliaments. A Rhetorical Approach. In: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Ed. by Paul Bayley. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 45–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005a). Interruption Patterns in British Parliamentary Debates and Drama Dialogue. In: Selected Papers from the 9th IADA Conference, Salzburg 2003. Ed. by Anne Betten and Monika Dannerer. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, pp. 418–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005b). Politeness in Sweden: Parliamentary Forms of Address. In: Politeness in Europe. Ed. by Leo Hickey and Miranda Stewart. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters, pp. 174–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Parliamentary Discourses. In: Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. Ed. by Keith Brown, pp. 188–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010b). Identity Co-Construction in Parliamentary Discourse Practices. In: Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 57–78.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010c). Strategic Uses of Parliamentary Forms of Address: The Case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag. In: Journal of Pragmatics 42.4, pp. 885–911. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Íñigo-Mora, Isabel. (2004). On the Use of the Personal Pronoun We in Communities. In: Journal of Language and Politics 3.1, pp. 27–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. (1996). Shadow Conversations: The Indeterminacy of Participant Roles. In: Natural Histories of Discourse. Ed. by Michael Silverstein and Greg Urban. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 131–159.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacques, Francis. (1983). Communication et ex-communication. Discours et Société. In: Degrés 33, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra M. (2009). Introduction: The Sociolinguistics of Stance. In: Stance. Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Ed. by Alexandra M. Jaffe. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janney, Richard W. (2002). Cotext as Context: Vague Answers in Court. In: Language & Communication 22.4, pp. 457–475. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaszczolt, Katarzyna. (1999). Discourse, Beliefs and Intentions: Semantic Defaults and Propositional Attitude Ascription. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam and Dariusz Galasiński. (2000). Vocative Address Forms and Ideological Legitimization in Political Debates. In: Discourse Studies 2.1, pp. 35–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. (1924). The Philosophy of Grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin LTD.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johansson, Marjut and Eija Suomela-Salmi. (2008). Énonciation. In: Handbook of Pragmatics. Ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. (2008). Dueling Contexts: A Dynamic Model of Meaning. In: Journal of Pragmatics 40.3, pp. 385–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Situation-Bound Utterances as Pragmatic Acts. In: Journal of Pragmatics 42.11, pp. 2889–2897. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan and Fenghui Zhang. (2013). On the Dynamic Relations Between Common Ground and Presupposition. In: Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics. Ed. by Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo, and Marco Carapezza. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 375–395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, Graeme. (1998). An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. (1986). L’implicite. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1990). Les interactions verbales. Tome 1. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1994). Les interactions verbales. Tome 3. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002). Adresse. In: Dictionnaire d’analyse du discours. Ed. by Patrick Charaudeau and Dominique Maingueneau, pp. 30–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). Introducing Polylogue. In: Journal of Pragmatics 36, pp. 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010a). Introduction. In: S’adresser à autrui. Les formes nominales d’adresse en français. Ed. by Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni. Chambéry: Université de Savoie, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010b). L’impolitesse en interaction. Aperçus théoriques et étude de cas. In: Lexis. Journal in English Lexicology HS 2. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, ed. (2010c). S’adresser à autrui. Les formes nominales d’adresse dans les interactions orales en français. Chambéry: Université de Savoie.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kipke, Rüdiger. (1995). Der Zwischenruf: Ein Instrument politisch-parlamentarischer Kommunikation. In: Sprache des Parlaments und Semiotik der Demokratie. Ed. by Andreas Dörner and Ludgera Vogt. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 107–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Chisato and Adrienne Lehrer. (1990). Impersonal Uses of Personal Pronouns. In: Journal of Pragmatics 14.5, pp. 739–759. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kleiber, Georges. (1984). Dénomination et relations dénominatives. In: Langages 19.76, pp. 77–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1994). Anaphores et pronoms. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koehn, Philipp. (2005). Europarl: A Parallel Corpus for Statistical Machine Translation. In: Proceedings of the Machine Translation Summit X. Phuket, pp. 79–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koester, Almut. (2010). Building Small Specialised Corpora. In: The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Ed. by Anne O’Keeffe and Michael McCarthy. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 66–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. (2010). Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroeger, Paul R. (2005). Analyzing Grammar: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. (1989). Towards a Typology of Contrastive Studies. In: Contrastive Pragmatics. Ed. by Wieslaw Oleksy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 55–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kühn, Peter. (1983). Der parlamentarische Zwischenruf als mehrfachadressierte Sprachhandlung. In: Sprache, Diskurs und Text. Akten des 17. Linguistischen Kolloquiums. Ed. by René Jongen et al. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, pp. 239–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995). Mehrfachadressierung. Untersuchungen zur adressatenspezifischen Polyvalenz sprachlichen Handelns. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuo, Sai-Hua. (2001). Reported Speech in Chinese Political Discourse. In: Discourse Studies 3.2, pp. 181–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lafon, Pierre. (1980). Sur la variabilité de la fréquence des formes dans un corpus. In: Mots. Les langages du politique 1.1, pp. 127–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach. (1990). Talking Power. The Politics of Language in Our Lives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lapaire, Jean-Rémi and Wilfrid Rotgé. (2002). Linguistique et grammaire de l’anglais. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lavoinne, Yves. (1999). Publicité des débats et espace public. In: Études de communication. langages, information, médiations 22, pp. 115–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Torrec, Virginie. (2005). Aux frontières de la publicité parlementaire : les assemblées et leur visibilité mediatisée. In: Réseaux 129–130, pp. 181–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lecolle, Michelle. (2004). Syntagmes génériques et collectifs comme dénomination/désignation de la catégorie de l’Autre. In: Colloque de Linguistique française, « La dénomination de l’autre ». Tunis, Faculté des Lettres de la Manouba.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, David Y. W. (2008). Corpora and Discourse Analysis. New Ways of Doing Old Things. In: Advances in Discourse Studies. Ed. by Vijay Bhatia, John Flowerdew, and Rodney H. Jones. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 86–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. (2000). Grammars of Spoken English: New Outcomes of Corpus-Oriented Research. In: Language Learning 50.4, pp. 675–724. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemieux, Cyril. (2007). À quoi sert l’analyse des controverses ? In: Mil neuf cent. Revue d’histoire intellectuelle 1.25, pp. 191–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lempert, Michael and Michael Silverstein. (2012). Creatures of Politics: Media, Message, and the American Presidency. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leudar, Ivan, Victoria Marsland, and Jirí Nekvapil. (2004). On Membership Categorization: ‘Us’, ‘Them’ and ‘Doing Violence’ in Political Discourse. In: Discourse & Society 15.2–3, pp. 243–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Participation Framework. In: Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order. Ed. by Paul Drew and Anthony Wootton. Oxford: Polity Press, pp. 161–227.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
L’Hôte, Emilie. (2014). Identity, Narrative and Metaphor. A Corpus-Based Cognitive Analysis of New Labour Discourse. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loewenberg, Gerhard and Samuel Charles Patterson. (1979). Comparing Legislatures. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorda, Clara Ubaldina. (2010). A Consensual Topic: The French and Spanish Parliaments against Domestic Violence. In: Journal of Pragmatics 42.4, pp. 943–956. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Louw, Bill. (1993). Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer? The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies. In: Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair. Ed. by Mona Baker, Gill Francis, and Elena Tognini-Bonelli. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 157–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. (1977). Semantics. Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K. S. (1987). Polyphonic Monologues. Quoted Direct Speech in Oral Narratives. In: IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 1.2, pp. 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maitland, Karen and John Wilson. (1987). Pronominal Selection and Ideological Confl In: Journal of Pragmatics 11.4, pp. 495–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manno, Giuseppe. (2002). La politesse et l’indirection : un essai de synthèse. In: Langage et société 100.2, pp. 5–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. and Peter R. R. White. (2007). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayaffre, Damon. (2002). Les corpus réflexifs : entre architextualité et hypertextualité. In: Corpus 1.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2003). Dire son identité politique. In: Cahiers de la Méditerranée 66, pp. 247–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael and Ronald Carter. (1994). Language as Discourse. Perspectives for Language Teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. (1984). Speech Acts and Goffman’s Participant Roles. In: Proceedings of the First Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 261–274.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally. (2008). Words in the World: How and Why Meanings Can Matter. In: Language 84.3, pp. 497–527. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony and Andrew Wilson. (2001). Corpus Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. (2010). Reference and the Pragmeme. In: Journal of Pragmatics 42.11, pp. 2882–2888. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mignot, Elise. (2015). Pragmatic and Stylistic Uses of Personal Pronoun One . In: The Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns. Ed. by Laure Gardelle and Sandrine Sorlin. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 275–310.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Millar, Sharon. (2015). Under Fire. Pronominal Use and Leadership in the Discourse of Helle Thorning-Schmidt. In: Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture. Ed. by John Wilson and Diana Boxer. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 67–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milner, Jean-Claude. (1976). Réflexions sur la référence. In: Langue française 30.1, pp. 63–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moirand, Sophie. (2004). Le dialogisme, entre problématiques énonciatives et théories discursives. In: Cahiers de praxématique 43, pp. 189–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Discours, mémoires et contextes : à propos du fonctionnement de l’allusion dans la presse. In: Corela. Cognition, représentation, langage HS-6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. (2015). The Facilitator’s Task of Formulating Citizens’ Proposals in Political Meetings: Orchestrating Multiple Embodied Orientations to Recipients. In: Gesprächsforschung. Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 16, pp. 1–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter and Rom Harré. (1990). Pronouns and People. The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niehr, Thomas. (2002). International vergleichende Diskurs- und Argumentationsanalyse. Vorstellung eines Forschungsprogramms. In: ELiSe. Essener Linguistische Skripte 2, pp. 51–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noren, Coco. (2013). Doing Politics or Doing Media? A Linguistic Approach to European Parliamentary Debate. In: Speaking of Europe. Approaches to Complexity in European Political Discourse. Ed. by Kjersti Fløttum. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 43–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norton, Philip. (1998). Old Institution, New Institutionalism? Parliament and Government in the UK. In: Parliaments and Governments in Western Europe. Ed. by Philip Norton. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 16–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Obeng, Samuel Gyasi. (1994). Verbal Indirection in Akan Informal Discourse. In: Journal of Pragmatics 21.1, pp. 37–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1997a). Indirectness in Pronominal Usage in Akan Discourse. In: Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16.2, pp. 201–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1997b). Language and Politics: Indirectness in Political Discourse. In: Discourse & Society 8.1, pp. 49–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999). Apologies in Akan Discourse. In: Journal of Pragmatics 31.5, pp. 709–734. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne. (2006). Investigating Media Discourse. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oktar, Lütfiye. (2001). The Ideological Organization of Representational Processes in the Presentation of Us and Them. In: Discourse & Society 12.3, pp. 313–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oleksy, Wieslaw. (1984). Towards Pragmatic Contrastive Analysis. In: Contrastive Linguistics. Prospects and Problems. Ed. by Jacek Fisiak. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 349–364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olivesi, Aurélie. (2012). Implicitement sexiste ? Genre, politique et discours journalistique. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ollivier-Yaniv, Caroline. (2010). Discours politiques, propagande, communication, manipulation. In: Mots. Les langages du politique 94, pp. 31–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. (2015). Evaluative Prosody. In: Corpus Pragmatics. A Handbook. Ed. by Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 279–303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patin, Stéphane. (2014). Les discours parlementaires européens : regard croisé français-espagnol. In: Revue française de linguistique appliquée XIX.1, pp. 71–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula. (2012). Collective Aspects of Subjectivity: The Subject Pronoun EµE’ις (‘We’) in Modern Greek. In: Subjectivity in Language and in Discourse. Ed. by Nicole Baumgarten, Inke Du Bois, and Juliane House. Leiden: Brill, pp. 33–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, ed. (2014a). Constructing Collectivity. ‘We’ across Languages and Contexts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014b). Constructing Collectivity with ‘We’. An Introduction. In: Constructing Collectivity. ’We’ across Languages and Contexts. Ed. by Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez de Ayala, Soledad. (2001). FTAs and Erskine May: Confl Needs? – Politeness in Question Time. In: Journal of Pragmatics 33.2, pp. 143–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petit, Gérard. (2012). Présentation : la dénomination. In: Langue française 174.2, pp. 3–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfister, Manfred. ([1977] 2001). Das Drama. Theorie und Analyse. München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pionchon, Sylvie and Grégory Derville. (2004). Les femmes et la politique. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pittner, Karin. (1996). Zur morphologischen Defektivität des Pronomens wer . In: Deutsch als Fremdsprache 33.2, pp. 73–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1998). Genus, Sexus und das Pronomen wer . In: Beiträge zu Sprache und Sprachen. Ed. by Robert J. Pittner and Karin Pittner. Munich: lincom europa, pp. 153–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plantin, Christian. (2016). Dictionnaire de l’argumentation. Une introduction aux études d’argumentation. Lyon: ENS Éditions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polenz, Peter. (2008). Deutsche Satzsemantik: Grundbegriffe des Zwischen-den-Zeilen-Lesens. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pulzer, Peter. (2006). Germany Votes for Deadlock: The Federal Election of 2005. In: West European Politics 29.3, pp. 560–572. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rai, Shirin M. (2010). Analysing Ceremony and Ritual in Parliament. In: The Journal of Legislative Studies 16.3, pp. 284–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin and Ruth Wodak. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rendle-Short, Johanna. (2007). “Catherine, you’re wasting your time”: Address terms within the Australian political interview. In: Journal of Pragmatics 39, pp. 1503–1525. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riegel, Martin, Jean-Christophe Pellat, and René Rioul. (1996). Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigat, Françoise. (2010). « Mes chers compatriotes » : stratégies discursives de l’interpellation des électeurs dans les professions de foi. In: Corela. Cognition, représentation, langage HS-8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rudolph, Elisabeth. (1996). Contrast. Adversative and Concessive Relations and Their Expressions in English, German, Spanish, Portuguese on Sentence and Text Level. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph. (2018). Corpus Linguistics for Pragmatics: A Guide for Research. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. In: Language 50, pp. 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1978). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. In: Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. Ed. by Jim Schenkein. New York: Academic Press, pp. 7–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Săftoiu, Răzvan and Carmen Popescu. (2014). Humor as a Branding Strategy in Political Discourse: A Case Study from Romania. In: Revista signos 47.85, pp. 293–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandré, Marion. (2009). Analyse d’un dysfonctionnement interactionnel – l’interruption – dans le débat de l’entre-deux-tours de l’élection présidentielle de 2007. In: Mots. Les langages du politique 89, pp. 69–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Constantes et spécificités des dysfonctionnements interactionnels dans le genre débat politique télévisé : une application au débat de l’entre-deux tours de l’élection présidentielle de 2007. Thèse de doctorat non publiée. Université Paul Valéry – Montpellier III.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). Discours rapportés et stratégies argumentatives : Royal et Sarkozy lors du débat de l’entre-deux tours. In: Langage et société 140, pp. 71–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scannell, Paddy. (1991). Broadcast Talk. London: SAGE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1996). Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-Interaction: A Partial Sketch of a Systematics. In: Studies in Anaphora. Ed. by Barbara A. Fox. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 437–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Whose Text? Whose Context? In: Discourse & Society 8.2, pp. 165–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheibman, Joanne. (2014). Referentiality, Predicate Patterns, and Functions of We-Utterances in American English Interactions. In: Constructing Collectivity. ’We’ across Languages and Contexts. Ed. by Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 23–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffer, Stephen R. (1972). Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. (1988). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). From Linguistic Reference to Social Reality. In: Discourse and Identity. Ed. by Anna De Fina, Deborah Schiffrin, and Michael Bamberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, Helmut. (1994). Probabilistic Part-of-Speech Tagging Using Decision Trees. In: Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing. Manchester.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995). Improvements in Part-of-Speech Tagging with an Application to German. In: Proceedings of the ACL SIGDAT-Workshop. Dublin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schnedecker, Catherine. (2005). Certain et ses avatars (certain N/un certain N; certains N/de certains N; certains) : approche diachronique. In: Travaux de linguistique 1.50, pp. 131–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schröter, Melani. (2006). Adressatenorientierung in der öffentlichen politischen Rede von Bundeskanzlern 1951–2001. Eine qualitativ-pragmatische Korpusanalyse. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sclafani, Jennifer. (2018). Talking Donald Trump: A Sociolinguistic Study of Style, Metadiscourse, and Political Identity. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Kate. 2019. Referring Expressions, Pragmatics, and Style: Reference and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1975). Indirect Speech Acts. In: Syntax and Semantics. Volume 3: Speech Acts. Ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan. New York: Academic Press, pp. 59–82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, Elena. (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serrano, Neus Nogué. (2018). La evolución de la referencia a los participantes en el debate parlamentario en catalán (1932–2013). In: Quaderns de Filologia – Estudis Lingüístics 23.23, pp. 283–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, Sylvia. (2000). Language, Gender and Floor Apportionment in Political Debates. In: Discourse & Society 11.3, pp. 401–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Governed by the Rules? The Female Voice in Parliamentary Debates. In: Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Contexts. Ed. by Judith Baxter. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 81–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shenhav, Shaul R. (2008). Showing and Telling in Parliamentary Discourse: The Case of Repeated Interjections to Rabin’s Speeches in the Israeli Parliament. In: Discourse & Society 19.2, pp. 223–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. (2004). Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Ways of Impersonalizing: Pronominal vs. Verbal Strategies. In: Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics. Ed. by María de los Ángeles Gómez González, J. Lachlan Mackenzie, and Elsa M. González Álvarez. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. (1992). The Indeterminacy of Contextualization: When Is Enough Enough? In: The Contextualization of Language. Ed. by Peter Auer and Aldo Di Luzio. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 55–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). “Direct” and “Indirect” Communicative Acts in Semiotic Perspective. In: Journal of Pragmatics 42.2, pp. 337–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, Horst J. (2003). Für eine grammatische Kategorie >Respekt<. Synchronie, Diachronie und Typologie der deutschen Anredepronomina. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Wie Höflichkeit die Person(en) verwirrt – und wie’s die Grammatik wieder ordnet. In: Der Ausdruck der Person im Deutschen. Ed. by Irmtraud Behr, Anne Larrory, and Gunhild Samson. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, pp. 57–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie and Karin Aijmer. (2007). The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: A Corpus-Based Study of English Adverbs. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, Peter R. R. White, and Karin Aijmer. (2007). Presupposition and ‘Taking-for-Granted’ in Mass Communicated Political Argument. An Illustration from British, Flemish and Swedish Political Colloquy. In: Political Discourse in the Media. Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Ed. by Anita Fetzer and Gerda Eva Lauerbach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 31–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. (2004). Corpus and Text: Basic Principles. In: Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice. Ed. by Martin Wynne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca. (2009). La prétérition comme outil de stratégie rhétorique. Trans. by Sivan Cohen-Wiesenfeld. In: Argumentation et Analyse du Discours 2. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Solin, Anna. (2009). Genre. In: Handbook of Pragmatics. Ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorlin, Sandrine. (2017). The Pragmatics of Manipulation: Exploiting Im/Politeness Theories. In: Journal of Pragmatics 121, pp. 132–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sprungk, Carina. (2007). The French Assemblée Nationale and the German Bundestag in the European Union Towards Convergence in the ‘Old’ Europe? In: National Parliaments within the Enlarged European Union. From ‘Victims’ of Integration to Competitive Actors? Ed. by John O’Brennan and Tapio Raunio. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 132–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. (1972). Pragmatics. In: Semantics of Natural Language. Ed. by Donald Davidson and Gilbert Harman. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 380–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1978). Assertion. In: Syntax and Semantics 9, pp. 315–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard. (2011). Genre between the Humanities and the Sciences. In: Bi-Directionality in the Cognitive Sciences: Avenues, Challenges, and Limitations. Ed. by Marcus Callies, Wolfram R. Keller, and Astrid Lohöfer. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 21–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. (2007). Alternative Recognitionals in Initial References to Persons. In: Person Reference in Interaction. Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Ed. by N. J. Enfield and Tanya Stivers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. (2001). Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. (1986). Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative. In: Direct and Indirect Speech. Ed. by Florian Coulmas. Berlin/New York/Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 311–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. ([1989] 2007). Talking Voices. Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1993). The Relativity of Linguistic Strategies: Rethinking Power and Solidarity in Gender and Dominance. In: Gender and Conversational Interaction. Ed. by Deborah Tannen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 165–188.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teletin, Andreea. (2013). Les vœux présidentiels au Portugal, en France et en Roumanie, et la crise internationale. Les enjeux des formes d’adresse et des procédés d’atténuation / intensification. In: Mots. Les langages du politique 101, pp. 31–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teubert, Wolfgang and Anna Cermáková. (2004). Directions in Corpus Linguistics. In: Lexicology and Corpus Linguistics. An Introduction. Ed. by M. A. K. Halliday et al. London/New York: Continuum, pp. 113–166.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thieroff, Rolf. (2000). Morphosyntax Nominaler Einheiten Im Deutschen. Habilitationsschrift. Universität Bonn.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, Jenny. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. (2001). Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Truan, Naomi. (2016a). Convoquer autrui dans le discours politique. Ethos et adresse indirecte dans les débats parlementaires allemands et britanniques contemporains sur l’Europe (1998–2015). In: Trajectoires HS. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2016b). « Les citations doivent être exactes ! ». Pratiques polémiques de la citation au parlement. In: Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage 32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2016c). On the Pragmatics of Interjections in Parliamentary Interruptions. In: Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 40, pp. 125–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2016d). Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the Assemblée Nationale (2002–2012) [Corpus]. In: ORTOLANG (Open Resources and TOols for LANGuage).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2016e). Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the Deutscher Bundestag (1998–2015) [Corpus]. In: ORTOLANG (Open Resources and TOols for LANGuage).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2016f). Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the House of Commons (1998–2015) [Corpus]. In: ORTOLANG (Open Resources and TOols for LANGuage).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2017). Zwischenrufe zwischen parlamentarischer Routine und Kreativität. Bundestagsdebatten über Europa aus dem Blickwinkel von unautorisierten Unterbrechungen. In: Cahiers d’Etudes Germaniques 73, pp. 125–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2018a). Generisch, unpersönlich, indefinit? Die Pronomina man, on, one und generisches you im politischen Diskurs. In: Diskursive Verfestigungen. Schnittstellen zwischen Morphosyntax, Phraseologie und Pragmatik im Deutschen und im Sprachvergleich. Ed. by Hélène Vinckel-Roisin, Laurent Gautier, and Pierre-Yves Modicom. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 347–363. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2018b). “Who Are You Talking About?”. The Pragmatics of Third-Person Referring Expressions. A Contrastive Corpus-Based Study of British, German, and French Parliamentary Debates. PhD thesis. Sorbonne Université / Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2019a). Möglichkeiten und Herausforderungen einer pragmatisch orientierten kontrastiven Diskursanalyse. Ein Vorschlag am Beispiel deutscher, französischer und britischer Parlamentsdebatten. In: Diskurse – digital 1.3, pp. 29–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2019b). Talking about, for, and to the People: Populism and Representation in Parliamentary Debates on Europe. In: Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 67.3, pp. 307–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2019c). The Discursive Construction of the People in European Political Discourse: Semantics and Pragmatics of a Contested Concept in German, French, and British Parliamentary Debates. In: Imagining the Peoples of Europe. Populist Discourses across the Political Spectrum. Ed. by Jan Zienkowski and Ruth Breeze. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 201–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Truan, Naomi & Laurent Romary. forthcoming. Building, Encoding, and Annotating a Corpus of Parliamentary Debates in XML-TEI: A Cross-Linguistic Account. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative (14).
Tyrkkö, Jukka. (2016). Looking for Rhetorical Thresholds: Pronoun Frequencies in Political Speeches. In: The Pragmatics and Stylistics of Identity Construction and Characterisation. Ed. by Minna Nevala et al. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van de Steeg, Marianne. (2010). The European Council’s Evolving Political Accountability. In: The Real World of EU Accountability. What Deficit? Ed. by Mark Bovens, Deirdre Curtin, and Hart Paul’t. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 117–149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Valk, Ineke. (2000). Interruptions in French Debates on Immigration. In: The Semiotics of Racism. Approaches in Critical Discourse Analysis. Ed. by Martin Reisigl and Ruth Wodak. Vienna: Passagen, pp. 105–128.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun Adrianus. (2003). Knowledge in Parliamentary Debates. In: Journal of Language and Politics 2.1, pp. 93–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). Text and Context of Parliamentary Debates. In: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Ed. by Paul Bayley. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 339–372. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. (1996). The Representation of Social Actors. In: Texts and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. Ed. by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 32–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. (2016). Contrastive Pragmatics. In: Handbook of Pragmatics. Ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vessey, Rachelle. (2013). Challenges in Cross-Linguistic Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. In: Corpora 8.1, pp. 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincent, Diane and Sylvie Dubois. (1997). Le discours rapporté au quotidien. Québec: Nuit Blanche.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincent, Diane and Olivier Turbide. (2005). Le discours rapporté dans le débat politique : une arme de séduction. In: Dans la jungle des discours. Genres de discours et discours rapporté. Ed. by Juan Manuel López Muñoz, Sophie Marnette, and Laurence Rosier. Cadix: Presses de l’Université de Cadix, pp. 307–320.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vladimirska, Elena. (2011). ‘Bien entendu’ vs. ‘naturellement’ : deux façons de désubjectiviser le dire. In: Oslo Studies in Language 3.1.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Münchow, Patricia. (2007). Le genre en linguistique de discours comparative. Stabilités et instabilités séquentielles et énonciatives. In: Linx. Revue des linguistes de l’université Paris X Nanterre 56, pp. 109–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vuković, Milica. (2012). Positioning in Pre-Prepared and Spontaneous Parliamentary Discourse: Choice of Person in the Parliament of Montenegro. In: Discourse & Society 23.2, pp. 184–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). Strong Epistemic Modality in Parliamentary Discourse. In: Open Linguistics 1.1. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wales, Katie. (1996). Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. (2010). Researching Ritual and the Symbolic in Parliaments: An Institutionalist Perspective. In: The Journal of Legislative Studies 16.3, pp. 352–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinrich, Harald et al.. (1993). Textgrammatik der deutschen Sprache. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wendler, Frank. (2016). Debating Europe in National Parliaments. Public Justification and Political Polarization. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne. (1998). Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
West, Candace and Don H. Zimmerman. (1987). Doing Gender. In: Gender & Society 1.2, pp. 125–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wieczorek, Anna E. (2015). ‘Look Who’s Talking Now’: A Taxonomy of Speakers in Single-Turn Political Discourse. In: Discourse Studies 17.3, pp. 343–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wieczorek, Anna Ewa. (2013). Clusivity. A New Approach to Association and Dissociation in Political Discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. (1986). Precision in Vagueness: The Semantics of English ‘Approximatives’. In: Journal of Pragmatics 10.5, pp. 597–613. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willis, Katharine S. et al., eds. (2009). Shared Encounters. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, John. (1990). Politically Speaking. The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2015). Talking with the President. The Pragmatics of Presidential Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitehead, Kevin A. & Gene H. Lerner. 2020. Referring to somebody: Generic person reference as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics 161. 46–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. (1995). Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual. Ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jan Blommaert. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 204–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). ‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Inclusion and Exclusion – Discrimination via Discourse. In: Identity, Belonging and Migration. Ed. by Gerard Delanty, Ruth Wodak, and Paul Jones. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 54–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xiao, Richard. (2008). Well-Known and Influential Corpora. In: Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook. Ed. by Anke Lüdeling and Merja Kytö. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 383–457.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yule, George. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Žagar, Igor. (2010). Topoi in Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6.1, pp. 3–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zarate, Geneviève. (1985). Enseigner une culture étrangere. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Junfeng. (2015). Interpersonal Prominence and International Presence. Implicitness Constructed and Translated in Diplomatic Discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziem, Alexander. (2014). Frames of Understanding in Text and Discourse. Theoretical Foundations and Descriptive Applications. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zifonun, Gisela. (2000). „Man lebt nur einmal.“ Morphosyntax und Semantik des Pronomens man . In: Deutsche Sprache 3, pp. 232–253.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Sowohl Determinativ als auch Pronomen? Sprachvergleichende Beobachtungen zu dieser, aller und Konsorten. In: Deutsche Sprache 33.3, pp. 195–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Teil IV: Indefinita Im Weiteren Sinne. In: Arbeitspapiere und Materialien zur deutschen Sprache 4.6, pp. 1–145.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2017). Pronomina. In: Grammatik des Deutschen im europäischen Vergleich. Das Nominal. Ed. by Lutz Gunkel et al. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 519–799.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zima, Elisabeth, Geert Brône, and Kurt Feyaerts. (2010). Patterns of Interaction in Austrian Parliamentary Debates. On the Pragmasemantics of Unauthorized Interruptive Comments. In: European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices. Ed. by Cornelia Ilie. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 135–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zupnik, Yael-Janette. (1994). A Pragmatic Analysis of the Use of Person Deixis in Political Discourse. In: Journal of Pragmatics 21.4, pp. 339–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue