In:The Pragmatics of Adaptability
Edited by Daniel N. Silva and Jacob L. Mey
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 319] 2021
► pp. 299–324
Chapter 14
Technological context
A new pragmatic product created by mobile devices
Published online: 17 March 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.319.14als
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.319.14als
Abstract
This study investigated the impact of technological devices on Kuwaiti youths as creators of a technological context with its own pragmatic parameters. To the youth, a parallel communicative world is in action when they engage in any communicative repertoire using mobile devices. I conducted a survey at the Gulf University for Science and Technology in Kuwait to investigate the existence of such a contextual realm and whether it has its own regulatory factors. A majority of my respondents emphasized that when talking with any person using a mobile device, they are indeed engaged in a communicative environment, the context of which has its own regulatory parameters, such as emoticons, pictures, sound files, text files, tweets, and so on. A majority of the respondents insisted that they feel more secure when using their mobile devices, implying that they become different individuals when doing so, and that this sudden role change occurs due to the contextual environment in which they are engaged. This study emphasizes that the technological context is the product of instant collaboration between two or more communicators in a real-time situation. I argue that technological meanings are produced solely in a technological context and, thus, their facilitating environments differ from those found in the real world.
Keywords: technological devices, technological context, emoticons, tweets
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Survey overview
- 5.Analyzing students’ WhatsApp chats
- 6. Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
References Appendix
References (19)
Al Sharoufi, Hussain. 2013. “The role of Pragmatics in Understanding Human Communication in an Institutional Setting.” Journal of Defense Resources Management
4 (2): 95–108.
Boyd, Dana, and Jeffrey
Heer. 2006. “Profiles as Conversation: Networked Identity Performance on Friendster.” Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-39), Persistent Conversation Track. Kauai, HI: IEEE Computer Society.
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
2011. “Speech Acts in Context.” In
Context and Contexts: Parts Meet Whole?
ed. by
Anita
Fetzer and Etsuko
Oishi, 171–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Motion, Judy, and Shirley
Leitch. 2007. “A Toolbox for Public Relations: The Oeuvre of Michel Foucault.” Relations Review
33 (3): 263–268.
O’Halloran, Kay L.
2010. “Multimodal Analysis and Digital Technology.” Multimodal Analysis Lab. Interactive and Digital Media Institute, National U of Singapore, n.d.
1–23.
Sadock, Jerrold. 2004. “Speech Acts.” In
Laurence R.
Horn and Gregory
Ward, eds. The Handbook of Pragmatics, 53–73. Oxford: Blackwell.
Searle, John R.
1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.
Sharifian, Farzad. 2010. “Cultural Conceptualisations in Intercultural Communication: A Study of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians.” Journal of Pragmatics
42 (12): 3367–3376.
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre
Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
