Cover not available

In:The Pragmatics of Adaptability
Edited by Daniel N. Silva and Jacob L. Mey
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 319] 2021
► pp. 191–212

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 9
Face, conflict, and adaptability in mediated intercultural invitations

Young adults navigate complexities of ethnicity, gender, nationality and age

 | Lesley University
 | Northeastern University
 | Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro
Published online: 17 March 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.319.09rib
Abstract
In a world of increasing national and international mobility, people are progressively more engaged in communication over multiple types of media. This paper discusses the question of adaptability in mediated intercultural communication, considering the perspectives of a group of international graduate students and their peers in a graduate program in a North American university. The paper explores the relational aspects of technologically mediated “invitations” as potential face threatening acts made more complex by the unequal social positions of the participants regarding ethnicity, gender, nationality, and age. It also problematizes the nature of mediated communication and choices of communicative tools, the contradictory assessments by users as to the value of specific semiotic information, and the chronotopes of mediated invitations that intensify facework.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Invitations: Face orientation and negotiation
  • 3.The data
    • Case 1.Rebecca. Using preliminaries: Texting to generate a Skype conversation
    • Case 2.Winnie: An invitation via email
    • Case 3.Lara: Direct FTA with no face protection except for the medium
    • Case 4. Claire: Indirectness and side sequences to protect face among siblings
  • 4.Further discussion
  • 5.Chronotopes – intensifying tension?
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
References (40)
References
Austin, John L. 1962. How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1972. “A Theory of Play and Fantasy.” In Steps to an ecology of mind, 177–93. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Durkheim and the Internet: On Sociolinguistics and the Sociological Imagination.” Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies. Tilburg University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Are Chronotopes Helpful?” CTRL+ALT+DEM 22-06-2018. [URL]
Blommaert, Jan, Laura Smits, Noura Yacoubi. 2018. Context and its Complications (Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies. Paper 208). Tilburg University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Ben Rampton. 2011. “Language and superdiversity.” Diversities 13 (2): 1–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourlai, Elli E. 2018. Gender and Language in Computer-Mediated Discourse: A Historical Analysis of USENET Newsgroups (Publication No. 13420750) [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Briggs, Charles L. 1996. “Introduction.” In Disorderly discourse. Narrative, Conflict and Inequality, ed. by C. L. Briggs, 3–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowan, S., Blanca T. Ribeiro, and Lucy Bunning. 2012. Complexity in Technologically-Mediated Communication: Do Cultural and Communication Norms Shift? Paper Presented at Society for Intercultural Education Training and Research, Minneapolis, Minn.
De Kadt, Elizabeth. 1998. “The Concept of Face and its Applicability to the Zulu Language.” Journal of Pragmatics 29: 173–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dresner, Eli, and Susan C. Herring. 2010. “Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force.” Communication Theory 20: 249–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 2018. “Equivocal invitations.” Journal of Pragmatics 125: 62–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewoood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1961. Asylums. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1967. Interactional Ritual. Essays on Face to Face Behavior. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holtgraves, Thomas M. 2002. Language as Social Action. Social Psychology and Language Use. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendall, Shari and Deborah Tannen 2015. “Discourse and Gender.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, and D. Schiffrin, 639–660. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Min-Sun. 2020. Non-Western Perspectives on Human Communication: Implications for Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., Brook Bolander, and Nicole Höhn. 2015. “Introducing Relational Work in Facebook and Discussion Boards.” Pragmatics 25 (1): 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Margutti, Piera, Liisa Tainio, Paul Drew, and Veronica Traverso. 2018. “Invitations and Responses across Different Languages: Observations on the Feasibility and Relevance of a Cross-Linguistic Comparative Perspective on the Study of Actions.” Journal of Pragmatics 125: 52–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2006. “Adaptability in Human-Computer Interaction.” In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. by Jacob L. Mey, 7–13. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L., and Barbara Gorayska. 1994. “Integration in Computing: An Ecological Approach.” Third International Conference on Systems Integration, São Paulo, Brazil, July 30-August 6.
Ribeiro, Branca T., and Lucy Bunning. 2011. Mediated intercultural Communication: The Analysis of Three Speech Events. Paper presented at Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics, Washington, D.C.
Ribeiro, Branca T., Liliana Cabral Bastos, and Lucy Bunning. 2015. Interaction in Mediated Intercultural Contexts: Face and Conflict over Ethnicity, Gender and Nationality. Perspectives from Young Adults. Paper presented at International Pragmatics Association, Antwerp, Belgium.
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1990. Approaches to Discourse Analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1984. Conversational Style. Analyzing Talk among Friends. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. “Silence: Anything but.” In Perspectives on Silence, D. Tannen and M. Saville-Troike, 93–112. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. That’s not what I meant! New York: Morrow.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. You’re the Only One I Can Tell. Inside the Language of Women’s Friendships. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, Stella. 2005. “The Matrix of Face: An Updated face Negotiation Theory.” In Theorizing about intercultural communication, ed. by W. B. Gudykunst, 71–92. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, Stella and John G. Oetzel. 2001. Managing Intercultural Conflict Effectively. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandergriff, Ilona. 2013. “Emotive Communication Online: A Contextual Analysis of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) Cues.” Journal of Pragmatics 51: 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue