In:The Pragmatics of Adaptability
Edited by Daniel N. Silva and Jacob L. Mey
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 319] 2021
► pp. 75–98
Chapter 4
The reality of technological worldviews
Time and space frames of reference in the world of self-driving cars
Published online: 17 March 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.319.04kaa
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.319.04kaa
Abstract
There appears to be a silent shift in technological discourse, from adapting technology to people’s needs to adapting people’s needs to new technologies. This shift in ‘direction-of-fit’ is effected by spatio-temporal text-world builders. The analysis of a technological article on self-driving cars serves as an example of a discourse-space approach to identifying the fundamental coordinates of worldview construction, involving Space, Time and Attitude. Results allow a critical evaluation of a one-directional heuristic that suggests user benefits. However, the frame-of-reference and point-of-view mask the socio-political consequences of introducing self-driving cars. The analysis reveals the subjective ground of the argument and challenges a self-assertive, dehumanised positivist attitude to technological innovation. It is argued that the spatial nature of worldview construction directs towards desires and intentions for action.
Keywords: worldview, intentionality, technological discourse, discourse-space, time
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Discursive epistemes
- 3.The self-fulfilling prophecy of some discourse worlds over others
- 4.
The spatial ground for sense making in thought, language, discourse and society
- 4.1Spatial cognition and the analogy between natural world perception and abstract world construction
- 5. A model for STA text-world analysis: Politics and technology
- 6. Rebooting the automobile
- 7.A technological perspective on the self-driving car
- 8. Conclusion
Notes References
References (46)
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination, Four Essays, edited byMichael
Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Biber, Douglas, and Bethany
Gray. 2010. “Challenging Stereotypes about Academic Writing: Complexity, Elaboration and Explicitness.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes
9: 2–10.
. 2013. “Nominalizing the Verb Phrase in Academic Science Writing.” In
The Verb Phrase in English, ed. by
Bas
Aarts
et al., 99–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bühler, Karl. 2011 [1934]. Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language. Translated by
D. F.
Goodwin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2005. “Vectors, Viewpoints and Viewpoint Shift: Toward a Discourse of Space Theory.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics
3: 78–116.
. 2013. Time: Language, Cognition and Reality. Time: Language, Cognition and Reality, Edited byK.
Jaszczolt & L. Saussure, pp. 236-258. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2014. Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, William, and D. Alan
Cruse. 2004. “An Overview of Construction Grammars.” In
Cognitive Linguistics, William
Croft and D. Alan
Cruse, 257–290. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dunmire, Patricia. 2011. Projecting the Future through Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Duranti, Alessandro. 2015. The Anthropology of Intentions: Language in a World of Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, Vyvyan. 2013. Language and Time: A cognitive linguistic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth
Wodak. 1997. Critical Discourse Analysis. In
Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by
Teun
van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.
Filardo Llamas, Laura, Christopher
Hart, and Bertie
Kaal, (eds). 2015. Special Issue: Space, Time and Evaluation in Ideological discourse. Critical Discourse Studies
12 (3)..
Foucault, Michel. 1965. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. Translated
by
R.
Howard. New York: Vintage/Random House.
Herman, David. 2003. Stories as a Tool for Thinking. In
Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences, ed. by
David
Herman, 163–192. Stanford: CSLI.
Hörnig, Robin, Berry
Claus, and Klaus
Eyferth. 2000. “In Search of an Overall Organizing Principle in Spatial Mental Models.” In
Spatial Cognition: Functions and Applications, ed. by
Seán Ó
Nualláin, 69–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Huysmans, Joris-Karl. 1959 [1884]. Against Nature. Translated by
Robert
Baldick. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Classics. [Original French title: A Rebours, ‘Against the Grain’]
Ives, Peter. 2004. Gramsci’s Politics of Language: Engaging the Bakhtin Circle and the Frankfurt School. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
Kaal, Bertie. 2012. “Worldviews: The Spatial Ground of Political Reasoning in Dutch Election Manifestos.” CADAAD
6 (1): 1–22.
. 2015. “How ‘Real’ Are Time and Space in Politically Motivated Worldviews?” Critical Discourse Studies
12 (3): 330–346.
. 2017. Worldview and Social Practice. A Discourse-Space Approach to Political Text Analysis. PhD Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Kress, Gunther, and Robert
Hodge. 1979. “Transformation and Truth.” In: Language as Ideology, Gunther
Kress, and Robert
Hodge, 15–37. London: Routledge.
Kuhn, Thomas
1970 [1962]. “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.” In
International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. 2, ed. by
Otto
Neurath, 43–51. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal
Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
Latour, Bruno. 1990. “Technology is Society Made Durable.” The Sociological Review
39 (S1): 103–131.
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press..
Levinson, Stephen. 2013. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984 [1979]. The Postmodern Condition: A report on knowledge. Translated by
G.
Bennington and B.
Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
McTaggart, John. 1908. “The Unreality of Time.” Mind: A Quarterly of Psychology and Philosophy
17: 456–473
Roderick, Ian. 2016. Critical Discourse Studies and Technology: A Multimodal Approach to Analysing Technoculture. London: Bloomsbury.
Searle, John. 2010. Making the Social World. The structure of human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
