Cover not available

In:The Pragmatics of Adaptability
Edited by Daniel N. Silva and Jacob L. Mey
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 319] 2021
► pp. 37–54

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 2
How do we adapt ourselves in performing an illocutionary act?

 | Tokyo University of Science
Published online: 17 March 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.319.02ois
Abstract
The present chapter examines the idea that language users adapt to linguistic/societal conventions to communicate with each other by describing the mechanism in which they perform an illocutionary act and engage in a communicative exchange. Austin’s ([1962]1975) felicity conditions are scrutinized to show how a speaker executes her/his own illocutionary act by utilizing and adapting to linguistic/societal conventions that specify illocutionary acts, their effects, the addressers, the addressees, and the contexts. There are linguistic/societal conventions which allow/force a speaker to specify the social relationship between the speaker and the hearer, and/or (in)formality of the speech situation. This is illustrated by examining the act of apologizing in Japanese, in which honorific marking is grammaticalized. There are also linguistic/societal conventions which specify illocutionary effects in discourse, which are analyzed as effects of expositive-type illocutionary acts (Austin ([1962]1975).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The speaker/the addresser, the hearer/the addressee and the circumstances of the speech situation/the context
  • 3. Different linguistic/societal conventions of performing illocutionary acts
  • 4.Illocutionary acts in discourse
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (18)
References
Austin, John L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press [First edition 1962]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1979. Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press [First edition 1961]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, John M. 1991. Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1981. “On Apologizing.” In Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 259–271. The Hague and New York: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ide, Risako. 1998. “Thank You for Your kindness: Japanese Interactional Ritual in Public Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 29(5): 509–529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd edition). Oxford & Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. “Adaptability in Human-computer Interaction.” In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics (2nd edition), ed. by Jacob L. Mey, 7–13. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oishi, Etsuko. 2011. “How Are Speech Acts Situated in Context?” In Context and Contexts: Parts Meet Whole?, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Etsuko Oishi, 181–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Apologies.” In Handbooks of Pragmatics, Volume 2: Pragmatics of Speech Actions, ed. by Marina Sbisà and Ken Turner, 499–530. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Discursive Functions of Evidentials and Epistemic Modals.” In Certainty-uncertainty – and the Attitudinal Space in Between, ed. by Sibilla Cantarini, Werner Abraham and Elisabeth Leiss, 239–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Follow-Ups as Speech Acts in Mediated Political Discourse.” In The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin, 33–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Austin’s Speech Acts and Mey’s Pragmemes.” In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use, ed. by Keith Allan, Alessandro Capone, and Istvan Kecskes, 335–350. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oishi, Etsuko and Fetzer, Anita. 2016. “Expositives in Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 96: 49–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olshtain, Elite and Andrew D. Cohen. 1983. “Apology: A Speech Act Set.” In Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition, ed. by Nessa Wolfson and Elliot Judd, 18–35. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Owen, Marion. 1983. Apologies and Remedial Interchanges: A Study of Language Use in Social Interaction. Berlin; New York: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2002. “Cognition and Narrativity in Speech Act Sequences. In Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics Meets Conversational Interaction, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Christiane Meierkord, 71–97. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Oishi, Etsuko
2025. Societal pragmatics. Pragmatics and Society 16:4 ► pp. 518 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue