In:The Pragmatics of Adaptability
Edited by Daniel N. Silva and Jacob L. Mey
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 319] 2021
► pp. 27–36
Chapter 1
Adaptability and truth
Published online: 17 March 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.319.01mey
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.319.01mey
Abstract
Factual statements are supposed to be necessarily ‘true’, as opposed to people’s opinions. But what is often not taken into account is the fact that statements always are by a speaker whose relationship to the truth, or command of the facts may be less evident. In particular, leaning on an understanding of ‘facts’ (in science and elsewhere) that is more attuned to the pragmatics of Gibsonian ‘affordances’ and context, the chapter argues for a renewed attention to the conditions of ‘stating’ that circumscribe the truth value of statements. Invoking such diverse authorities as Giambattista Vico, Pope Francis, and Bruno Latour, it is claimed that all speaking is an activity of ‘acting in the world’ around us, rather than merely ‘representing’ that world. This has consequences for the precept of ‘letting the facts speak for themselves’ – as it is affirmed in a deceptively simple, but essentially vacuous popular slogan.
Keywords: adaptability, truth, pragmatics, facts, affordance
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Adaptability and scientific truth
- 1.1‘Let the facts speak’
- 1.2 A papal pragmatics
- 1.3Cognitive aspects and Piaget’s work
- 2.Truth and activity: Vico’s take
- 3.Adapting in context
- 3.1 ‘Fishy’ laws
- 3.2The limits of truth
- 3.3Time and space
- 3.4The case of Alzheimer’s Disease
- 4.Adaptability and truth
- 5. Truth and ecology: Will the twain ever meet?
Notes References
References (13)
Atherton, J. S.
2013. “Learning and Teaching: Piaget’s Developmental Theory” (retrieved 7 July 2015 from [URL])
Gibson, James J.
1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin.
Gore, Al. 2006. An Inconvenient truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About it. Emmaus, Penn.: Rodale.
Glasersfeld, Ernst von. 2007. “Aspects of Constructivism: Vico, Berkeley, Piaget.” In
Key Works in Radical Constructivism, ed. by
Marie
Larochelle, 91–99. Rotterdam: Sense.
Gu, Yueguo. 2010. “The Activity Type as Interface between Langue and Parole, and between Individual and Society: An Argument for Trichotomy in Pragmatics.” Pragmatics and Society
1 (1): 74–101.
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno & Steven
Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. [1979]
Mey, Jacob L.
1985. Whose Language? A Study in Linguistic Pragmatics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Oishi, Etsuko
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
