Cover not available

In:Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and practice
Edited by Chaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus and Hartmut Haberland
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 318] 2021
► pp. 259–286

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 9
Candidates’ use of Twitter during the 2016 Austrian presidential campaign

 | University of Vienna, Austria
Published online: 21 April 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.09gru
Abstract
This paper explores the Twitter use by the candidates of the 2016 Austrian presidential campaign which lasted for almost one year and required three ballots in sequence. The data corpus consists of all Twitter messages the candidates posted during the campaign. Drawing on theoretical considerations regarding politicians’ and political parties’ use of internet communication technologies (esp. the innovation vs. the normalization hypotheses), the paper explores the content level, the use of rhetorical actions, and selected aspects of the interpersonal level of the data. Results show that the candidates’ communication strategies cannot fully be explained by either of the two hypotheses and hence that none of them can predict electoral success in this specific political campaign. It is concluded that the two proposed hypotheses concerning the use of internet communication technologies in the field of politics are too broad and that they have to be modified to account for contextual aspects of specific political communication situations.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The use of ICTs in political communication
  • 3.Methodological approach
  • 4.The 2016 Austrian presidential campaign: Details and data
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (36)
References
Ausserhofer, Julian, and Axel Maireder. 2013. “National Politics on Twitter.” Information, Communication & Society 16(3): 291–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruns, Axel, and Tim Highfield. 2013. “Political Networks on Twitter: Tweeting the Queensland State Election.” Information, Communication & Society 16(5): 667–691. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel. 2017. The Semiotic of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Draucker, Fawn, and Lauren B. Collister. 2015. “Managing Participation through Modal Affordances on Twitter.” Open Library of Humanities 1(1): 1–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2014a. “On the Part of Ratified Participants: Ratified Listeners in Multi-Party Interactions.” Brno Studies in English 40(1): 27–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014b. “Participation Framework Underlying YouTube Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 73: 37–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Anchor Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Todd, Marcel Broersma, Karin Hazelhoff, and Guido van ’t Haar. 2013. “Between Broadcasting Political Messages and Interacting with Voters: The Use of Twitter during the 2010 UK General Election Campaign.” Information, Communication & Society 16(5): 692–716. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut. 2018. “Genres of Political Communication in Web 2.0.” In Handbook of Political Communication, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and ‎Bernhard Forchner, 412–425. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Are Austrian Presidential Candidates Ordinary People? Candidates’ Self-Presentation Strategies on Twitter during the 2016 Austrian Presidential Election Campaign.” In Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Elda Weizman, 21–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hermans, Liesbeth, and Maurice Vergeer. 2013. “Personalization in E-Campaigning: A Cross-National Comparison of Personalization Strategies Used on Candidate Websites of 17 Countries in EP Elections 2009.” New Media & Society 15(1): 72–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, Nigel A., and Darren G. Lilleker. 2009. “Building an Architecture of Participation? Political Parties and Web 2.0 in Britain.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 6(3–4): 232–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
John, Nicholas A. 2013. “Sharing and Web 2.0: The Emergence of a Keyword.” New Media & Society 15(2): 167–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jungherr, Andreas. 2014. “Twitter in Politics: A Comprehensive Literature Review.” [URL] (accessed 7 April 2016).
Koc-Michalska, Karolina, Darren G. Lilleker, Alison Smith, and Daniel Weissmann. 2016. “The Normalization of Online Campaigning in the Web.2.0 Era.” European Journal of Communication 31(3): 331–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreis, Ramona. 2017. “The ‘Tweet Politics’ of President Trump.” Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 607–618. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsson, Anders Olof. 2013. “‘Rejected Bits of Program Code’: Why Notions of ‘Politics 2.0’ Remain (Mostly) Unfulfilled.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 10(1): 72–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsson, Anders Olof, and Øyvind Ihlen. 2015. “Birds of a Feather Flock Together? Party Leaders on Twitter during the 2013 Norwegian Elections.” European Journal of Communication 30(6): 666–681. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsson, Anders Olof, and Bente Kalsnes. 2014. “‘Of Course We Are on Facebook’: Use and Non-Use of Social Media among Swedish and Norwegian Politicians.” European Journal of Communication 29(6): 653–667. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lockhart, Michele (ed.). 2018. President Donald Trump and His Political Discourse: Ramifications of Rhetoric via Twitter. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White. 2007. Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice, and danah boyd. 2011. “To See and Be Seen: Celebrity Practice on Twitter.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 17(2): 139–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ott, Brian L. 2017. “The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 34(1): 59–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riboni, Giorgia. 2015. “Enhancing Citizen Engagement: Political Weblogs and Participatory Democracy.” In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions, ed. by Marta Dynel, and Jan Chovanec, 259–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2009. “Uptake and Conventionality in Illocution.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5(1): 33–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schweitzer, Eva Johanna. 2008. “Innovation or Normalization in E-Campaigning?: A Longitudinal Content and Structural Analysis of German Party Websites in the 2002 and 2005 National Elections.” European Journal of Communication 23(4): 449–470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 1996. Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vergeer, Maurice, Liesbeth Hermans, and Steven Sams. 2013. “Online Social Networks and Micro-Blogging in Political Campaigning: The Exploration of a New Campaign Tool and a New Campaign Style.” Party Politics 19(3): 477–501. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vitak, Jessica. 2012. “The Impact of Context Collapse and Privacy on Social Network Site Disclosures.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56(4): 451–470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yaqub, Ussama, Soon Ae Chun, Vijayalakshmi Atluri, and Jaideep Vaidya. 2017. “Analysis of Political Discourse on Twitter in the Context of the 2016 US Presidential Elections.” Government Information Quarterly 34(4): 613–626. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2011. “Ambient Affiliation: A Linguistic Perspective on Twitter.” New Media & Society 13(5): 788–806. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Twitter.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 201–224. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina & Galia Hirsch
2025. What kind of laughter?. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 35:2 ► pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Gruber, Helmut
2019. Are Austrian presidential candidates ordinary people?. In The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 307], ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue