Cover not available

In:Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and practice
Edited by Chaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus and Hartmut Haberland
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 318] 2021
► pp. 145–172

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 5
Speech acts and the dissemination of knowledge in social networks

 | University of Trieste, Italy
 | University of Trieste, Italy
Published online: 21 April 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.05lab
Abstract
This paper analyzes how social network users engaged in discussions under a public post contribute to knowledge dissemination through their verbal behavior in the light of an Austin-based speech-act theoretical framework. We first argue that such a framework can be applied not only to face-to-face interaction, but also to internet-mediated communication, since it identifies kinds of illocutionary acts on the basis of recognizable procedure patterns which can be made manifest through different communication channels. We then examine to what extent the performance of different kinds of illocutionary acts contributes to knowledge dissemination through the achievement of their characteristic effects or other aspects of their procedure patterns. For each of four main classes of illocutionary acts, we discuss examples from comments on Facebook posts concerning health- and politics-related issues.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Social networks and speech acts
  • 3.An Austin-based speech act theoretical framework
  • 4.Illocutionary act types and their contributions to the dissemination of knowledge
    • 4.1Verdictives
    • 4.2Exercitives
    • 4.3Commissives
    • 4.4Behabitives
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Authorship statement
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (37)
References
Alston, William P. 2000. Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words (2nd rev., ed. by James O. Urmson, and Marina Sbisà). Oxford: Oxford University Press [First edition 1962]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2018. “Relational Work in Multimodal Networked Interactions on Facebook.” Internet Pragmatics 1(1): 134–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2012. “Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17(4): 501–521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carr, Caleb T., David B. Schrock, and Patricia Dauterman. 2012. “Speech Acts Within Facebook Status Messages.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31(2): 176–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DiNucci, Darcy. 1999. “Fragmented Future.” Print 53(32): 221–222.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dresner, Eli, and Susan C. Herring. 2010. “Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force.” Communication Theory 20: 249–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Sage L. 2007. “Disagreeing to Agree: Conflict (Im)politeness and Identity in a Computer-Mediated Community.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 742–759. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. “Relationality, Friendship, and Identity in Digital Communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 305–320. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C. 2004. “Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior.” In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, ed. by Sasha Barab, Rob Kling, and James H. Gray, 338–376. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C., and Jannis Androutsopoulos. 2015. “Computer-Mediated Discourse 2.0.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd edn.), ed. by Deborah Tannen, Deborah S. Schiffrin, and Heidi Ehernberger Hamilton, 127–151. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labinaz, Paolo, and Marina Sbisà. 2017. “Credibilità e disseminazione di conoscenze nei social network [Credibility and Knowledge Dissemination in Social Networks].” Iride 30: 63–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1979. “Scorekeeping in a Language Game.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marsili, Neri. 2020. “Retweeting: Its Linguistic and Epistemic Value.” Synthese. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth G. 2005. Language: A Biological Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Reilly, Tim. 2007. “What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software.” Communications & Strategies 65: 17–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 1984. “On Illocutionary Types.” Journal of Pragmatics 8: 93–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. “Acts of Explanation: A Speech Act Analysis.” In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Argumentation. Vol. 2, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles Arthur Willard, 7–17. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. Linguaggio, ragione, interazione. Per una pragmatica degli atti linguistici [Language, Reason, Interaction. For a Pragmatic Theory of Speech Acts]. Bologna: il Mulino; reprinted as a digital edition by Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2009 [the page numbers indicated in the paper refer to the digital edition]. [URL] (accessed 10 April 2018).
. 1990. “Speech Acts and the Expression of Affect.” Grazer Linguistische Studien 33–34: 279–295.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. “Ideology and the Persuasive Use of Presupposition.” In Language and Ideology: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference. Vol. 1, ed. by Jef Verschueren, 492–509. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Illocutionary Force and Degrees of Strength in Language Use.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1791–1814. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Communicating Citizenship in Verbal Interaction: Principles of a Speech Act Oriented Discourse Analysis.” In Analysing Citizenship Talk: Social Positioning in Political and Legal Decision-Making Processes, ed. by Heiko Hausendorf, and Alfons Bora, 164–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “How to Read Austin.” Pragmatics 17: 461–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Uptake and Conventionality in Illocution.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5: 33–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Varieties of Speech Act Norms.” In Normativity and Variety of Speech Actions, ed. by Maciej Witek, and Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka, 23–50. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “Assertion among the Speech Acts.” In The Oxford Handbook of Assertion, ed. by Sanford C. Goldberg, 159–178. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1975. “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts.” In Language, Mind and Knowledge, ed. by Keith Gunderson, 344–369. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R., and Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, Thomas W. 2017. “Telepresence and Trust: A Speech-Act Theory of Mediated Communication.” Philosophy & Technology 30: 443–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F. 1964. “Intention and Convention in Speech Acts.” The Philosophical Review 73: 439–460. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Witek, Maciej. 2013. “Three Approaches to the Study of Speech Act.” Dialogue and Universalism 23: 129–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “An Interactional Account of Illocutionary Practice.” Language Sciences 47: 43–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “El discurso de las identidades en línea: El caso de Facebook [The Discourse of Online Identities: The Case of Facebook].” Discurso & Sociedad 8: 398–426.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina & Galia Hirsch
2025. What kind of laughter?. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 35:2 ► pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Mullan, Kerry
2024. “Resident superhero”. Internet Pragmatics 7:1 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Virtanen, Tuija
2024. Pretending to pretend. In The Pragmatics of Hypocrisy [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 343], ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Bin
2024. Sisterhood construction through commenting by Chinese women. Pragmatics & Cognition 31:2 ► pp. 367 ff. DOI logo
Caponetto, Laura & Paolo Labinaz
2023. Marina Sbisà’s Deontic Approach to Speech Actions. In Sbisà on Speech as Action [Philosophers in Depth, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Labinaz, Paolo
2023. Public disagreements among health experts and their polarizing effects during a pandemic health crisis. In A Pragmatic Agenda for Healthcare [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 338], ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
McGowan, Mary Kate
2023. On Media Reports, Politicians, Indirection, and Duplicity. Topoi 42:2 ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Sbisà, Marina
2023. Essays on Speech Acts and Other Topics in Pragmatics, DOI logo
García-Sánchez, Soraya
2021. TED talks: multimodal communicative affordances for EPS/ELF dissemination. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 10:2 ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue