Cover not available

In:Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and practice
Edited by Chaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus and Hartmut Haberland
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 318] 2021
► pp. 27–45

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 1
Expanding pragmatics

Values, goals, ranking, and internet adaptability

 | University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
Published online: 21 April 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.01mey
Abstract
A pragmatic (rather than merely ‘extended’) perspective on internet user values regards both the value(s) of the interaction and those of its results. Firstly, a pragmatic evaluation presupposes that the interactants are agreed on what to evaluate and how, which implies the values being ordered in a ‘ranking’ according to importance. On the internet, such values depend on ‘likes’ or ‘hits’; the number of times a contribution has been accessed, even if negatively (in a so-called ‘shit storm’) makes it important. Secondly, being based on ranking, the evaluation is pragmatic: values are not a priori given, but emerge in interaction. Ranking presupposes the users’ accepting society’s values and collaborating in their creation; on the internet, this is done through ‘meaning making’ activities like ‘texting,’ ‘tweeting,’ or ‘instagramming.’ Current evaluation, in contrast to earlier, is ubiquitous, continuous, and accessible by i-Phone, i-Pad or other social-mediatic devices. Access and speed are important here; one cannot with impunity disregard a tweet, a writing on one’s Facebook, or an Instagram sent by one of one’s contacts.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Extending or expanding
  • 3.A man and his cat: Value and behavior
  • 4.Goals and values
  • 5.Values in society
  • 6.The ‘honor’ problem
  • 7.Truth and value in science
  • 8.The pragmatics of value
  • 9.Value-laden conflict: The participant observer
  • 10.‘Are they biting?’: Values and pragmemes
  • 11.User values in the cyber world
  • 12.Conclusion: Adaptability vs. adaptivity
  • Notes
  • References
References (29)
References
Arnould, Eric J. 1998. “Ethical Concerns in Participant Observation/ Ethnography.” Advances in Consumer Research 25: 72–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baider, Fabienne, Sharon Millar, and Stavros Assimakopoulos. 2020. “Introduction: Defining, Performing and Countering Hate Speech.” Pragmatics and Society 11(2): 171–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capone, Alessandro, and Jacob L. Mey (eds.). 2016. Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dyson, Freeman J. 2014. “The Case for Blunders.” New York Review of Books, 6 March.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2002 [1987]. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. 2000. “Across the Scales of Time: Artifacts, Activities, and Meanings in Ecosocial Systems.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 7(4): 273–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1993. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction (second, revised and enlarged edition). Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. “Adaptability.” In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. by Jacob L. Mey, 7–13. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. “The Well-Timed Speech Act: Bourrée for Bache.” RASK: International Journal of Language and Communication 38: 265–278.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016a. “Practs and Facts.” In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use, ed. by Keith Allan, Alessandro Capone, and Istvan Kecskes, 239–248. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016b. “Why We need the Pragmeme, or: Speech Acting and Its Peripeties.” In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use, ed. by Keith Allan, Alessandro Capone, and Istvan Kecskes, 133–140. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016c. “Pragmatics Seen through the Prism of Society.” In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use, ed. by Keith Allan, Alessandro Capone, and Istvan Kecskes, 105–132. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. “Expanding Pragmatics: Values, Goals, and Adaptability.” Paper presented at Pragmasophia II, 18–22 September 2018, Lisbon, Faculty of Communication and Social Sciences, Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
2020. “In tempore opportuno: Of Certainty and Uncertainty in (Non)time.” In Pragmatics, Discourse and Society: A Festschrift for Akin Odebunmi, ed. by Niyi Osunbade, Foluke Unuabonah, Ayo Osisanwo, and Funke Oni. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Posner, Roland. 1990. Warnung an die ferne Zukunft: Atommüll als Kommunikationsproblem. [Warning to a Remote Future: Nuclear Waste as a Communication Problem]. München: Raben Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poulsen, Søren Vigild. 2018. “Constructing the Corporate Instagram Discourse: A Critical Visual Discourse Approach.” Digital Age in Semiotics and Communication 1(1): 95–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Recanati, François. 2010. Truth-Conditional Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1944. Huis clos [No Exit]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turkle, Sherry. 1985. The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. “Cyberspace and Identity.” Contemporary Sociology 28(6): 643–648. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005 [1996]. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voloshinov, Valentin N. 1973 [1929]. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language (trans. by Ladislav Matejka, and I. R. Titunik). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xie, Chaoqun. 2008. “(Im)politeness: Towards an Evaluative and Embodied Approach.” Pragmatics & Cognition 16(1): 151–175.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Li, Jie & Yanling Lin
2023. Parentheses used as pragmatic strategies in Chinese online socialization. Pragmatics and Society 14:3 ► pp. 442 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue