Cover not available

In:The Dynamics of Text and Framing Phenomena: Historical approaches to paratext and metadiscourse in English
Edited by Matti Peikola and Birte Bös
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 317] 2020
► pp. 289–307

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 12
Paratext, information studies, and Middle English manuscripts

ORCiD logo with link | University of Washington
Published online: 18 November 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.317.12moo
Abstract
Investigations of paratextual elements can be approached methodologically from the vantage of information science. Information structure (the organization of information on the clausal and sentence level) is connected to the discipline of linguistics, and information design (the ways that a text presents material in its layout or appearance) derives from website construction and digital humanities. Although they stem from different disciplinary conversations and contexts, information structure and design collectively provide tools for examining aspects of text on the manuscript page, and drawing upon these analytic rubrics rather than the more traditional rubrics of manuscript studies serves to highlight new features and put manuscript work in closer conversation with present-day visual and textual analysis. This investigation draws upon illustrative examples from the Middle English Brut Chronicle to examine how the structural and graphical choices of the late Middle English manuscript page work together to organize and structure information, and examines the terminological and interpretative distinctions between different analytical frameworks.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The framework of information studies
  • 3. Peritextual structure and information studies in manuscripts of the Brut
    • 3.1Introduction to the Brut Chronicle
    • 3.2Headings
    • 3.3Paraph marks
    • 3.4Clause structure marking of given and new information
    • 3.5Ruling
  • 4.Analytic models
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Primary sources
  • Secondary sources
References (59)
Primary sources
Brie, Friedrich W. D., (ed). (1906, 1908). The Brut, or The Chronicles of England. 2 vols. The Early English Text Society, os 131, 136. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed). The Brut, or The chronicles of England. Edited from Ms. Raw. B171, Bodleian Library, &c., by Friedrich W. D. Brie, with introduction, notes, and glossary. Corpus of Middle English Prose and Verse. [URL]
Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, MS 225. [URL]
Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Rauner MS 003183. [URL]
Glasgow, University of Glasgow, MS Hunter 83 (T.3.21). [URL]
Manchester, University of Manchester Library, English MS 102. [URL]
Secondary sources
Adams, Robert. 1995. “Langland’s ‘Ordinatio’: The ‘Visio’ and the ‘Vita’ Once More.” The Yearbook of Langland Studies 8: 51–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Armstrong, Guyda. 2015. “Coding Continental: Information Design in Sixteenth-Century English Vernacular Manuals and Translations.” Renaissance Studies 29: 78–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arthur, Paul, and Romedi Passini. 1992. Wayfinding: People, Signs, and Architecture. Ontario: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertin, Jacques. 1983. Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beymer, David, Daniel M. Russell, and Peter Z. Orton. 2005. “Wide vs. Narrow Paragraphs: An Eye Tracking Analysis.” In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3585, ed. by Maria F. Costabile, and Fabio Paternò, 741–752. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birke, Dorothee, and Birte Christ. 2013. “Paratext and Digitized Narrative: Mapping the Field.” Narrative 21 (1): 65–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brie, Friedrich W. D. 1906. (ed). The Brut, or the Chronicles of England. London: Early English Text Society by Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co., Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryan, Elizabeth J. 2009. “Rauner Codex MS 003183: The Beeleigh Abbey Brut at Dartmouth College.” The Journal of the Early Book Society 12: 207–244.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butterfield, Ardis. 1996. “Mise-En-Page in the Troilus Manuscripts: Chaucer and French Manuscript Culture.” Huntington Library Quarterly: A Journal for the History and Interpretation of English and American Civilization 58 (1): 49–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Chronicles of England. Book of the month: University of Glasgow special collections. [URL]
de Hamel, Christopher. 2001. The British Library Guide to Manuscript Illumination: History and Techniques. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drucker, Johanna. 2014. Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2007. Information structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Murray J. 1985. “ Ordinatio and Narrative Links: The Impact of Malory’s Tales as a ‘Hoole Book.’” In Studies in Malory, ed. by James W. Spisak, 29–52. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Furnish, Shearle. 1990. “The Ordinatio of Huntington Library, MS HM 149: An East Anglian Manuscript of Nicholas Love’s Mirrour .” Manuscripta 34 (1): 50–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. 1997 [1987]. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Jane E. Lewin, trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinton, Norman D. 1984. “The Canterbury Tales as Compilatio .” Proceedings of the Illinois Medieval Association 1: 28–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, Robert. 1998. Visual Language: Global Communication for the 21st Century. Bainbridge Island, WA: MacroVU Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Information Design: Concepts and Theories. [URL].
Jacobson, Robert (ed). 1999. Information Design. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Ian. 2015. “From Nicholas Love’s Mirror to John Heigham’s Life: Paratextual Displacements and Displaced Readers.” In Discovering the Riches of the Word: Religious Reading in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, ed. by Sabrina Corbellini, Margriet Hoogvliet, and Bart Ramakers, 190–212. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, Joel. 2012. Designing Information: Human Factors and Common Sense in Information Design. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keiser, George R. 1991. “ Ordinatio in the Manuscripts of John Lydgate’s Lyf of Our Lady: Its Value for the Reader, Its Challenge for the Modern Editor .” In Medieval Literature: Texts and Interpretation, [Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies: 79], ed. by Tim W. Machan, 139–157. Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, Edward D. 1989. “Chronicles and Other Historical Writing.” In A Manual of the Writings in Middle English 1050–1500, vol. 8, ed. by Albert E. Hartung. New Haven, CT: The Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou. 2009. “The Consequences of the Loss of Verb-Second in English: Information Structure and Syntax in Interaction.” English Language and Linguistics 13 (1): 97–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. A Historical Syntax of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynch, Kevin. 1960. Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malamed, Connie. 2009. Visual Language for Designers: Principles for Creating Graphics that People Understand. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marvin, Julia. 2014. “‘It is to harde for my lernyng’: Making Sense of Annotations in Brut Manuscripts.” Digital Philology: A Journal of Medieval Cultures 3 (2): 304–322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marx, William. 2006. “Reception and Revision in the Middle English Prose Brut .” Trivium 36: 53–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marx, William, and Raluca Radulescu. 2006. “Introduction, Readers and Writers of the Prose Brut.” Trivium 36: xiii–xvi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matheson, Lister M. 1998. The Prose Brut: The Development of a Middle English Chronicle. Tempe, AZ: Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meurman-Solin, Anneli, María J. López-Couso, and Bettelou Los (eds). 2012. Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mooney, Linne R., and Lister M. Matheson. 2003. “The Beryn Scribe and his Texts: Evidence for Multiple-Copy Production of Manuscripts in Fifteenth-Century England.” The Library 7th ser. 4: 347–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, Colette. 2020. “Information Design and Information Structure in the Middle English Prose Brut .” In Message and Medium: English Language Practices Across Old and New Media, ed. by Caroline Tagg, and Mel Evans, 261–280. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morse, Mary. 1999. “Seeing and Hearing: Margery Kempe and the Mise-En-Page .” Studia Mystica 20: 15–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkes, Malcolm B. 1976. “The Influence of the Concepts of Ordinatio and Compilatio on the Development of the Book.” In Medieval Learning and Literature: Essays Presented to Richard William Hunt, ed. by Jonathan J. G. Alexander, and Margaret T. Gibson, 115–141. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peikola, Matti. 2008. “Aspects of Mise-En-Page in Manuscripts of the Wycliffite Bible.” In Medieval Texts in Context, ed. by Graham D. Caie, and Denis Renevey, 28–67. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Guidelines for Consumption: Scribal Ruling Patterns and Designing the Mise-En-Page in Later Medieval England.” In Manuscripts and Printed Books in Europe 1350–1550: Packaging, Presentation and Consumption, ed. by Emma Cayley, and Susan Powell, 14–31. Liverpool, England: Liverpool UP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Manuscript Paratexts in the Making: British Library MS Harley 6333 as a Liturgical Compilation.” In Discovering the Riches of the Word: Religious Reading in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, ed. by Sabrina Corbellini, Margriet Hoogvliet, and Bart Ramakers, 44–67. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rouse, Richard H., and Mary A. Rouse. 1992. “ Ordinatio and Compilatio Revisited.” In Ad Litteram: Authoritative Texts and Their Medieval Readers, [Notre Dame Conferences in Medieval Studies 3], ed. by Mark D. Jordan, and Kent Emery Jr., 113–134. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saint-Martin, Fernande. 1990. Semiotics of Visual Language. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shedroff, Nathan. 1999. “Information Interaction Design: A Unified Field Theory of Design.” In Information Design, ed. by Robert Jacobson, 267–292. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevens, Martin. 1991. “The Towneley Plays Manuscripts (HM1): Compilatio and Ordinatio.” Text 5: 157–173.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stockwell, Robeert P. 1984. “On the History of the Verb-Second Rule in English.” In Historical Syntax, ed. by Jacek Fisiak, 575–592. Paris: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Andrew. 2002. Textual Situations: Three Medieval Manuscripts and Their Readers. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Kemenade, Ans, and Marit Westergaard. 2012. “Syntax and Information Structure: Verb-Second Variation in Middle English.” In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, ed. by Anneli Meurman-Solin, María J. López-Couso, and Bettelou Los, 87–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel. 2014. Scribal Correction and Literary Craft: English Manuscripts 1375–1510. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Designing English: Early Literature on the Page. Oxford: Bodleian Library, University of Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, Gregory, and Betty Birner. 2004. “Information Structure and Non-Canonical Syntax.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 153–174. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, Gregory, Betty Birner, and Rodney Huddleston. 2002. “Information Packaging.” In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, ed. by Rodney Huddleston, and Geoffrey K. Pullum, 1363–1447. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wayfinding in Web Design. [URL]
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue