Cover not available

In:The Dynamics of Text and Framing Phenomena: Historical approaches to paratext and metadiscourse in English
Edited by Matti Peikola and Birte Bös
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 317] 2020
► pp. 163–185

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 7
“All which I offer with my own experience”

An approach to persuasive advertising strategies in the prefatory matter of 17th-century English midwifery treatises

ORCiD logo with link | University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Instituto Universitario de Análisis y Aplicaciones Textuales IATEXT)
ORCiD logo with link | University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Instituto Universitario de Análisis y Aplicaciones Textuales IATEXT)
Published online: 18 November 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.317.07dom
Abstract
In 17th-century England, a growing popular interest in medical literature brought with it a significant editorial boom in the field. This meant that the number of midwifery treatises published gradually increased, resulting in strong competition for a place in the sales market. Authors, editors and other agents deployed different advertising strategies in the front matter of the books, which served as publicity blurbs specifically designed to convince the potential reader to buy the work. Such strategies were supported by a series of arguments and assertions both to attract the readers’ attention and to help increase sales of the product. In this paper we identify and analyse the persuasive marketing strategies used to construct the prefatory discourse in a selection of 17th-century English midwifery treatises. Taking into account some studies on current advertising strategies, Genette’s (1997) theory on paratext and Aristotle’s classical rhetorical model, we have classified marketing strategies into those which are (1) focused on who produces the text, that is, how the authors establish authority and use their professional experience and moral integrity to convince the potential user to buy their book over another (ethos); (2) intended to highlight the relevant role of midwives in taking care of women and newborns and securing their welfare (pathos); and (3) related to the quality and utility of the work (logos).
Article outline
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Selected study material
  • 3.Prefatory matter as a space for persuasion and marketing: Models of analysis
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Ethos, or author-based persuasive strategies
      • 4.1.1Expertise or competence
      • 4.1.2Trustworthiness
    • 4.2Pathos, or reader-based persuasive strategies
    • 4.3Logos, or text-based persuasive strategies
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Primary sources
  • Secondary sources
References (54)
Primary sources
Anon. 1675. Every woman her own midwife. London: Printed for Simon Neale. [Wing / E3553].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1682. The English Midwife Enlarged. London: Printed for Rowland Reynolds. [Wing / E3104].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1690. Aristotle’s master-piece: or, The Secrets of Generation Display’d in all the Parts Thereof. London: printed by F.L. [Wing / A3697gA].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1700. Aristotle’s compleat and experienc’d midwife. London: printed, and sold by the booksellers. [Wing / A3697bA].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barret, Robert. 1699. A companion for midwives, child-bearing women, and nurses. London: Printed for Tho. Ax. [Wing / B913].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chamberlayne, Thomas. 1656. The compleat midwifes practice. London: Printed for Nathaniel Brooke. [Wing / C1817C].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Nicholas. 1651. A directory for midwives. London: Printed by Peter Cole. [Wing / C7488].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1656. A directory for midwives. London: Printed by Peter Cole. [Wing / C7490].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guillemeau, Jacques. 1612. Child-birth or, the happy deliuerie of women. London: Printed by A. Hatfield. [STC (2nd ed.) / 12496].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauriceau, François. 1672. The diseases of women with child, and in child-bed. London: Printed by John Darby. [Wing / M1371B].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rüff, Jakob. 1637. The expert midwife. London: Printed by E. G[riffin] for S. B[urton]. [STC (2nd ed.) / 21442].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sermon, William. 1671. The ladies companion, or, the English midwife. London: Printed for Edward Thomas. [Wing / S2628]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharp, Jane. 1671. The midwives book, or, the whole art of midwifry discovered. London: Printed for Simon Miller. [Wing / S2969B].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolveridge, James. 1670. Speculum matricis hybernicum, or, The Irish midwives handmaid. London: Printed by E. Okes. [Wing / W3319].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Secondary sources
Allotey, Jane C. 2011. “Writing Midwives’ History: Problems and Pitfalls.” Midwifery 27 (2): 131–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barrett-Litoff, Judy. 1982. “The Midwife Throughout History.” Journal of Nurse-Midwifery 27 (6): 3–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bennett, Henry S. 1989. English Books and Readers III. 1603 to 1640. Being a Study in the History of the Book Trade in the Reigns of James I and Charles I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bevington, David (ed). 1998. Troilus and Cressida by William Shakespeare. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cahill, Heather A. 2001. “Male Appropriation and Medicalization of Childbirth: An Historical Analysis.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 33 (3): 334–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cody, Lisa F. 1999. “The Politics of Reproduction: From Midwives’ Alternative Public Sphere to the Public Spectacle of Man-Midwifery.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 32 (4): 477–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, Guy. 2001. The Discourse of Advertising. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dobranski, Stephan B. 2005. Readers and Authorship in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, Piero. 1982. “The Language of the Advertising Slogan. Part 2.” Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research 8 (1): 35–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
EEBO: Early English Books Online. (n.d.). ProQuest. Ann Arbor, Michigan. [URL]
Evenden, Doreen A. 2000. The Midwives of Seventeenth-Century London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fissell, Mary E. 2007. “The Marketplace of Print.” In Medicine and the Market in England and Its Colonies, c. 1450-c.1850, ed. by Mark S. R. Jenner, and Patrick Wallis, 108–132. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. “Introduction: Women, Health, and Healing in Early Modern Europe.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 82: 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freese, John Henry. 1926. Aristotle, The ‘Art’ of Rhetoric. London/Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guffey, Mary E., and Dana Loewy. 2010. Essentials of Business Communication. Mason, Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamlet, Jess. 2015. “Browsing Early English Bookstalls.” CEA Critic 77 (3): 284–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hellwarth, Jennifer W. 2002. The Reproductive Unconscious in Medieval and Early Modern England. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higgins, Colin, and Robyn Walker. 2012. “ Ethos, Logos, Pathos: Strategies of Persuasion in Social/Environmental Reports.” Accounting Forum 36: 194–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hobby, Elaine (ed). 1999. The Midwives Book or the Whole Art of Midwifery Discovered. Jane Sharp. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Peter M. 2011. “Medical Literacies and Medical Culture in Early Modern England.” In Medical Writing in Early Modern English, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Päivi Pahta, 30–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Richard G., Jr. 2013. Communication in the Real World: An Introduction to Communications Studies. Irvington, NY: Flat World Knowledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kassell, Lauren. 2013. “Medical Understandings of the Body, c. 1500–1750.” In The Routledge History of Sex and the Body: 1500 to the Present, ed. by Sarah Toulalan, and Kate Fisher, 57–74. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kontoyannis, Maria, and Chrsitos Katsetos. 2011. “Midwives in Early Modern Europe (1400–1800).” Health Science Journal 5 (1): 31–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary. 2004. Renaissance Drama and the Politics of Publication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loudon, Irvine. 2008. “General Practitioners and Obstetrics: A Brief History.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 101 (11): 531–535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marland, Hilary. 1993. The Art of Midwifery. Early Modern Midwives in Europe. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parsons, Patricia J. 2013. Beyond Persuasion. Communication Strategies for Healthcare Managers in the Digital Age (2nd ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perloff, Richard M. 2017. The Dynamics of Persuasion. Communication and Attitudes in the 21st Century (6th ed.). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Powell, Louise. 2018. “Touching Twins in the Texts and Medical Paratexts of Seventeenth-Century Midwifery Books.” In Medical Paratexts from Medieval to Modern. Dissecting the Page, ed. by Hannah C. Tweed, and Diane G. Scott, 43–56. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saenger, Michael B. 2005. “The Birth of Advertising.” In Printing and Parenting in Early Modern England, ed. by Douglas A. Brooks, 197–220. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. The Commodification of Textual Engagements in the English Renaissance. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samuel-Azran, Tal, Moran Yarchi, and Gadi Wolfsfeld. 2018. “Rhetoric Styles and Political Affiliations During Israel’s 2013 ‘Facebook Elections.’” International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 31: 15–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steinger, Sheila. 2006. Persuasive Communication Skills: Public Speaking. Cape Town: Juta Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stiff, James B., and Paul A. Mongeau. 2016. Persuasive Communication (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tether, Leah. 2017. Publishing the Grail in Medieval and Renaissance France. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Towler, Jean, and Joan Bramall. 1986. Midwives in History and Society. New Hampshire: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Adrian. 1995. The Making of Man-Midwifery: Childbirth in England, 1660–1770. London: University College of London Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Sung-Byung, Hanna Lee, Kyungmin Lee, and Chulmo Koo. 2018. “The Application of Aristotle’s Rhetorical Theory to the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Study of Airbnb.” Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 35 (7): 938–957. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Young, Richard O. 2017. Persuasive Communication. How Audiences Secide (2nd ed.). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Peikola, Matti
2025. Text Editions and the Philological Tradition. In The New Cambridge History of the English Language, ► pp. 154 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue