Cover not available

In:The Discourse of Indirectness: Cues, voices and functions
Edited by Zohar Livnat, Pnina Shukrun-Nagar and Galia Hirsch
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 316] 2020
► pp. 59–82

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

“Hero, genius, king and Messiah”

Ironic echoing in pro-ethos and anti-ethos readers’ comments on Facebook posts

 | Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Published online: 29 October 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.316.03shu
This paper discusses readers’ comments on posts written by the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on his Facebook page in November 2017. It focuses on the use of ironic echoes (Sperber & Wilson 1981) of compliments and accusations, including multi-stage ones, to either enhance or damage Netanyahu’s ethos as a successful leader.
It is argued that Netanyahu’s supporters use ironic echoes of accusations by his critics in order to enhance his ethos, whereas his critics use ironic echoes of compliments to Netanyahu in order to damage it. Moreover, It is argued that both the construction and de-construction of Netanyahu’s ethos are intertwined with the self-enhancement of the positive face (Brown & Levinson 1987) of commenters from one political camp, alongside the threat to the positive face of their rivals.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Ethos, face and positioning
  • 3.Netanyahu and his Facebook page
  • 4.Pro-ethos readers’ comments vs. anti-ethos readers’ comments
  • 5.Ironic echoing in reader’s comments
  • 6.Ironic echoing in comments by Netanyahu’s supporters
  • 7.Ironic echoing in comments by Netanyahu’s critics
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (53)
References
Aristotle. Rhetoric. Perseus Digital Library Project, accessed May 21, 2020, ([URL]).
Atifi, Hassan, and Michel Marcoccia. 2015. “Follow-ups and dialogue in online discussions on French politics.” In The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Lawrence Berlin, 109–140, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1991. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. New York: Oxford Universiy Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. The Speech in the Novel. Tel Aviv: Hapoalim. (Hebrew)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carretero, Marta, Carmen Maíz-Arévalo, and M. Ángeles Martínez. 2015. “An Analysis of Expressive Speech Acts in Online Task-oriented Interaction by University Students.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 173 (13): 186–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig. 1984. “On the Pretense Theory of Irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 121–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo, and Elda Weizman. 1987. “Contextual Exploitation of Interpretation Clues in Text Understanding: An Integrated Model.” In The Pragmatic Perspective, ed. by Jef Verschueren, and Marcella Bertuccelli-Papi, 31–46. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Bronwyn, and Rom Harré. 1990. “Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 20 (1): 43–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dori–Hacohen, Gonen. 2016. “The ‘Tokbek’ as an Israeli Term for Talk: The Potential for Democratic Carnival and Defective Democratic Reality.” Israel studies in language and society 9 (1–2): 164–183. (Hebrew)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dori–Hacohen, Gonen, and Nimrod Shavit. 2013. “The Cultural Meanings of Israeli Tokbek (Talkback Online Commenting) and their Relevance to the Online Democratic Public Sphere.” International Journal of Electronic Governance 6 (4): 361–379. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2015. “‘When You Came into Office You Said That Your Government Would Be Different:’ Forms and Functions of Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse.” In The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Lawrence Berlin, 245–273, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, Elda Weizman, and Lawrence Berlin (eds.). 2015. The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-ups. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granato, Luisa, and Alejandro Parini. 2015. “Online Follow-ups as Evaluative Reactions to Two Visits of the Argentinian President to the United States.” In The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Lawrence Berlin, 141–169, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert P. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1978. “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 113–127. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, and Grant Gillett. 1994. The Discursive Mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, and Luk van Langenhove (eds.). 1999. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of International Action. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haverkate, Henk. 1990. “A Speech Act Analysis of Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 77–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirsch, Galia. 2011a. “Redundancy, Irony and Humor.” Language Sciences 33: 316–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. “Between Irony and Humor: A Pragmatic Model.” Pragmatics and Cognition 19 (3): 530–561. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Who is the Victim? When the Addresser of the Echoed Utterance and the Target of the Irony Differ.” Text & Talk, 37 (2): 189–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johansson, Marjut. 2015. “Bravo for This Editorial!: Users’ Comments in Discussion Forums.” In Follow-Ups in Political Discourse: Explorations across Contexts and Discourse Domain, ed. by Elda Weizman, and Anita Fetzer, 83–107. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kampf, Zohar, and Roni Danziger. 2019. “‘You Dribble Faster than Messi and Jump Higher than Jordan’: The Art of Complimenting and Praising in Political Discourse.” Journal of Politeness 15 (1): 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kohn, Ayelet, and Motti Neiger. 2007. “To Talk and Talkback: The Rhetoric of the Talkback in Israeli On-line Newspapers.” In On-line Newspapers in Israel, ed. by Tehila Altshuler, 321–350. Jerusalem: The Israeli Democratic Institute and Ben-Gurion University. (Hebrew)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika. 2013. “Blogging as the Mediatization of Politics and a New Form of Social Interaction: A Case Study of “Proximization Dynamics” in Polish and British Political Blogs.” In Analyzing Genres in Political Communication, ed. by Piotr Cap, and Urszula Okulska (eds.), 379–421. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1984. Revolution in Poetic Language. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. The Kristeva Reader. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehti, Lotta. 2011. “Blogging Politics in Various Ways: A typology of French Politicians’ Blogs.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1610–1627. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers Roy, Alice. 1981. “The Function of Irony in Discourse.” Text 1 (4): 407–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ronan, Patricia. 2015. “Categorizing Expressive Speech Acts in the Pragmatically Annotated SPICE Ireland Corpus.” ICAME Journal 39: 25–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 1984. “On Illocutionary Types.” Journal of Pragmatics 8: 93–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1976. “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5 (1): 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R., and Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina. 2009. “Quotation Markers as Intertextual Codes in Electoral Propaganda.” Text and Talk 29 (4): 459–480. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “‘Well, Yair? When Will You Be Prime Minister?’: Different Readings of Ordinariness in a Politician’s Facebook Post as a Case in Point.” In The Construction of Ordinariness across Media Genres, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Elda Weizman, 103–129. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “The Right to Speak and the Request to Remain Silent: Who Own Politicians’ Facebook Pages”? Israel Affairs 26 (1): 26–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1981. “Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda. 2000. “Irony in News Discourse.” In Raphael Nir Jubilee Book: Studies in Communication, Linguistics and Language Teaching, ed. by Ora Rodrigue-Schwarzwald, Shoshana Blum-Kulka, and Elite Olshtain, 237–248. Jerusalem: Carmel. (Hebrew)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Positioning in Media Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Irony in and through Follow-ups: Talk and meta-Talk in Online Commenting in the Israeli context.” In The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Lawrence Berlin, 173–194, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda, and Marcelo Dascal. 1991. “On Clues and Cues: Strategies of Text Understanding.” Journal of Literary Semantics XX (1): 18–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda, and Dori-Hacohen, Gonen. 2017. “On-line Commenting on Opinion Editorials: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Face Work in the Washington Post (USA) and NRG (Israel).” Discourse Context Media 19: 39–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2006. “The Pragmatics of Verbal Irony: Echo or Pretence”? Lingua 116: 1722–1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 1992. “On Verbal Irony.” Lingua 87: 53–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Gruber, Helmut
2025. Snyder and Habermas on the war in Ukraine: a critical discourse analysis of elite media discourse in Germany. Critical Discourse Studies 22:5 ► pp. 494 ff. DOI logo
Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina & Galia Hirsch
2025. What kind of laughter?. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 35:2 ► pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina & Zohar Livnat
2024. Specified compliments in comments to politicians’ Facebook posts. Pragmatics & Cognition 31:2 ► pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
Hirsch, Galia & Pnina Shukrun-Nagar
2023. Flirting with the Israeli Prime Minister, humorously . The European Journal of Humour Research 11:2 ► pp. 20 ff. DOI logo
Weizman, Elda & Ayelet Kohn
2022. Resemblance in comments/posts interaction. Pragmatics and Society 13:5 ► pp. 861 ff. DOI logo
Niebuhr, Oliver & Vered Silber-Varod
2021. How versatility performance influences perception of charismatic speech. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 22:3 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue