Cover not available

In:Manners, Norms and Transgressions in the History of English: Literary and linguistic approaches
Edited by Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 312] 2020
► pp. 183–212

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Variations from letter-writing manuals

Humble petitions signed by women in Late Modern London

 | Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Published online: 11 August 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.312.09nur
Abstract
The present study analyses two sets of 25 petitions each. They were signed by different women who possibly belonged to lower social ranks, and they were addressed to the governors of the Foundling Hospital and the Bank of England. These were most probably men who occupied high positions in society. The study focuses on the comparison between the information present in the manuals and the petitions selected for this study. The petitioners had different needs and their circumstances also varied. This is reflected in the results, which show differences, and also similarities, between the two sets of petitions. Furthermore, most display some features found in the manuals, but not all of them follow the rules or recommendations faithfully. The writers, who cannot always be identified and may not have been the same as the signees, seem to have been aware of the existence of letter-writing manuals, but they may not have had first-hand contact with them.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Letter-writing and petitions in eighteenth-century England
  • 3.Letter-writing manuals in Late Modern England
    • 3.1The instructions in these manuals
    • 3.2Features of the petitions in the manuals
  • 4.The present study
    • 4.1The data
    • 4.2The manuals
  • 5.Method
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Group 1: Petitions that include a superscription and/or an opening formula
    • 6.2Group 2: Petitions that do not include a superscription and/or an opening formula
  • 7.A comparison between Group 1 and Group 2
  • 8.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
References (51)
Sources
Anon. 1721. The Young Secretary’s Guide. London: H. Tracey.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1756. The Complete Letter-Writer or New and Polite English Secretary. London: S. Crowder and H. Woodgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1765. The Ladies Complete Letter-Writer, 2nd ed. London:T. LowndsGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1772. The Complete Letter-Writer or Polite English Secretary. London: S. Crowder.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1778. The Complete Letter-Writer. Edinburgh: W. Darling.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1797. The Complete Art of Writing Letters. London: T. Lowndes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, George. 1790. The English Letter-Writer or the Whole Art of General Correspondence […] together with the Universal Petitioner. London: A. Hogg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooke, Thomas. 1791. The Universal Letter-Writer or New Art of Polite Correspondence […] to which is added the Complete Petitioner. London: W. Osborne, T. Griffin and J. M. Mozley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gent, G. F. 1721. The Secretary’s Guide.London: T. Norris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, John. 1719. The Young Secretary’s Guide. London: D. Rhodes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
References
Auer, Anita. 2015. “Stylistic Variation.” In Letter Writing and Language Change, ed. by Anita Auer, Daniel Schreier, and Richard J. Watts, 133–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Anita, Daniel Schreier, and Richard J. Watts. (eds). 2015. Letter Writing and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bannet, Eve T. 2005. Empire of Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickham, George. 1743. The Universal Penman. London: R. Sayer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brant, Clare. 2006. Eighteenth Century Letters and British Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coar, Thomas. 1796. A Grammar of the English Tongue. London: James Phillips.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2018. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina, and Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds). 2008. Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina, and Gabriella del Lungo Camiciotti (eds). 2012. Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elspass, Stephan. 2012. “Between Linguistic Creativity and Formulaic Restriction: Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Nineteenth-century Lower Class Writers’ Private Letters.” In Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe, ed. by Marina Dossena, and Gabriella del Lungo Camiciotti, 45–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Tanya. 2005. ‘Unfortunate Objects’: Lone Mothers in Eighteenth-Century London. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairman, Tony. David Barton, and Nigel Hall2000. “English Pauper Letters 1800–34, and the English Language.” In Letter Writing as Social Practice, ed. by , 63–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fens-de Zeeuw, Lyda. 2008. “The Letter-writing Manuals in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth centuries: From Polite to Practical.” In Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence: Methodology and Data, ed, by Marina Dossenam and Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, 163–192. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, Lawrence D. 2007. “Dictamen in England, 1500–1700.” In Letter Writing Manuals and Instruction from Antiquity to the Present, ed. by Carol Poster, and Linda C. Mitchell, 102–126. Columbia:University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenwood, James. 1737. The Royal English Grammar. London: J. Nourse.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. 1755. A Dictionary of the English Language. London: W. Strahan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
King, Steven. 2007. “Pauper Letters as a Source.” Family and Community History 10 (2): 167–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laitinen, Mikko. 2015. “Early Nineteenth-century Pauper Letters.” In Letter Writing and Language Change, ed. by Anita Auer, Daniel Schreier, and Richard J. Watts, 185–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levene, Alysa, Steven King, Alannah Tomkins, Peter King, Thomas Nutt, Deborah A. Symonds, and Lisa Zunshine (eds). 2006. Narratives of the Poor in Eighteenth Century Britain. Vol. 1: Voices of the Poor: Poor Law Depositions and Letters. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McClure, Ruth K. 1981. Coram’s Children: The London Foundling Hospital in the Eighteenth Century. Yale: Yale University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meldrum, Tim. 1997. “London Domestic Servants from Depositional Evidence, 1660 1750: Servant-employer Sexuality in the Patriarchal Household.” In Chronicling Poverty: The Voices and Strategies of the English Poor, 1640–1840, ed. by Tim Hitchcock, Pamela Sharpe, and Peter King, 47–69. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Domestic Service and Gender 1660–1750: Life and Work in the London Household. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, Linda C. 2007. “Letter-writing Instruction Manuals in Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century England.” In Letter-Writing Manuals and Instruction from Antiquity to the Present, ed. by Carol Poster, and Linda C. Mitchell, 178–199. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2007. “Introduction.” In Letter-Writing, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, 1–11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, and Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen (eds). 2007. Letter-Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nixon, Cheryl, and Louise Penner. 2009. “Materials of the ‘Everyday’ Woman Writer: Letter-writing in Eighteenth-century England and America.” In Women and Things, 1750–1950: Gendered Material Strategies, ed. by Beth Tobin, and Maureen Goggin, 157–187. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palk, Deidre. 2007. Prisoners’ Letters to the Bank of England, 1781–1827, Vol. 42. London: London Record Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pugh, Gillian. 2007. London’s Forgotten Children. Thomas Coram and the Foundling Hospital. London: Tempus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sokoll, Thomas (ed). 2001. Essex Pauper Letters, 1731–1837. Records of Social and Economic History, New Series 30. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Writing for Relief: Rhetoric in English Pauper Letters, 1800–1834.” In Being Poor in Modern Europe: Historical Perspectives 1800–1940, ed. by Andreas Gestrich, Steven King, and Raphael Lutz, 91–111.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steinbach, Susie. 2004. Women in England 1760–1914. A Social History. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2011. The Bishop’s Grammar: Robert Lowth and the Rise of Prescriptivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. In Search of Jane Austen. The Language of the Letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Timmis, Ivor. 2018. “The Pragmatics in the Essex Pauper Letters, 1731–1837.” Corpus Pragmatics 2: 243–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomkins, Alannah. 2011. “‘I mak Bould to Wrigt’1: First-Person Narratives in the History of Poverty in England, c. 1750–1900.” History Compass 9 (5): 365–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waddle, Brodie. 2016. Was Early Modern England a Petitioning Society? Retrieved from [URL] (accessed 27th April 2019).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whyman, Susan E. 2009. The Pen and the People. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woolley, Hannah. 1673. The Gentlewoman’s Companion or a Guide to the Female Sex. London: A. Maxwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woodfine, Philip. 2006. “Debtors, Prisons and Petitions.” Eighteenth-Century Life 30 (2): 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaret, David. 1996. “Petitions and the Invention of Public Opinion in the English Revolution.” American Journal of Sociology 101 (6): 1497–1555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Origins of Democratic Culture: Printing, Petitions, and the Public Sphere in Early-Modern England. Vol. 5. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Calvo Cortés, Nuria
2024. Filled-in petition forms and hand-drafted petitions to the Foundling Hospital. In Unlocking the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 364], ► pp. 198 ff. DOI logo
Gardner, Anne-Christine
2023. English Pauper Letters in the Eighteenth Century and Beyond. Linguistica 63:1-2 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue