In:The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres
Edited by Anita Fetzer and Elda Weizman
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 307] 2019
► pp. 209–236
Constructing ordinariness in online commenting in Hebrew and Finnish
Published online: 12 December 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.307.09wei
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.307.09wei
Abstract
This chapter studies how ‘ordinariness’ and mostly ‘ordinary’ are being constructed in on-line commenting in Hebrew and Finnish. Starting with the premise that “being ordinary” is dynamically and co-operatively constructed, we adopt the notion of “positioning” to account for the ways ordinary commenters position third parties as ordinary and thus “do being ordinary” and the accountability related to it. The study relies on corpus-based methods: using corpora of commenting in each language, the equivalents of ‘ordinary’, i.e. tavallinen (Finnish), ragil and pashut (Hebrew), are identified and the attitudinal meanings implied by their collocations are examined. The findings indicate that both Hebrew and Finnish commenters position ordinary people in the contexts of politics and politicians, social injustice, social norms, moral and ethics. Culture-specific contexts include military service and orthodox/secular conflicts in Hebrew, self- and other- positioning as having positive qualities coupled with the feeling of being excluded from society in Finnish.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Commenting and mediatization
- 3.Ordinariness
- 4.Positioning
- 5.Data and methods
- 5.1Methodological rationale
- 5.2The Hebrew data
- 5.3The Finnish data
- 6.Similar categories in the Hebrew and the Finnish data
- 6.1Ordinary people vs. politicians and politics
- 6.2Social injustices: State vs. ordinary
- 6.3Ordinary citizen, social norms and control
- 6.4Moral and ethics of the ordinary person
- 7.Specific categories in the Hebrew data
- 8.Specific categories in the Finnish data
- 9.Conclusion
Notes References Appendix
References (50)
Bail, Christopher A. 2008. “The Configuration of Symbolic Boundaries against Immigrants in Europe.” American Sociological Review 73:37–59.
Bös, Birte and Sonja Kleinke 2017. “Publicness and Privateness.” In Pragmatics of Social Media. ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 83–121. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
Charaudeau, Patrick. 2011. Réflexions pour l’analyse du discours populiste. Mots. Les langages du politique 97. [URL]
Couldry, Nick, and Andreas Hepp 2013. “Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments.” Communication Theory 23 (3): 191–202.
Davies, Bronwyn and Rom Harré 1990. “Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1): 43–63.
Ekström, Mats, Fornäs, Johan, Jansson, André and Anne Jerslev 2016. “Three Tasks for Mediatization Research: Contributions to an Open Agenda.” Media, Culture & Society 38 (7): 1090–1108.
Fetzer, A. and Weizman, E.. 2018. “Ordinariness in Mediated Political Discourse”. Discourse and Society 29 (5): 1–19.
Fetzer, Anita, Elda Weizman and Lawrence Berlin (eds.). 2015. The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Gruber, Helmut. This volume. “Are Austrian presidential Candidates Ordinary People? Results of an Analysis of Candidates’ Self-Presentation Strategies on Twitter during the 2016 Austrian Presidential Campaign”
Harré, Rom and Luk van Langenhove (eds.). 1999. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of International Action, Oxford: Blackwell.
Hunston, Susan. 2007. “Semantic Prosody Revisted”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12, 2, 2:249–268.
Izre’el, Shlomo. 2005. “Corpus Linguistics and Lexical Grammar – or: Are new Methods in Lexicology Useful or Do They Cause Harm?” In Samaritan, Hebrew and Aramaic Studies Presented to Professor Abraham Tal, ed. by Moshe Bar-Asher and Moshe Florentin, 335–359. Jerusalem: The Bialik Instituite, 2005. 335–359. [in Hebrew]
Johansson, Marjut. 2006. “Constructing Objects of Discourse in the Broadcast Political Interview.” Journal of Pragmatics, Volume 38, Issue 2: 216–229.
. 2015. “Bravo for this Editorial! Users’ Comments in Discussion Forums.” In Follow-ups in Political Discourse. Explorations across contexts and discourse domains. ed. by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer, 83–107. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2017. “Everyday Opinions in News Discussion Forums: Public Vernacular Discourse.” Discourse, Context & Media 19: 5–12.
Johansson, Marjut, Jantunen, Jarmo H., Heimo, Anne, Ahonen, Mirka, and Veronika Laippala. 2018.”Verkkokeskustelujen kansa. Korpusavusteinen diskurssianalyysi Suomi24-keskustelupalstasta [People of discussion forums. Corpus-assisted discourse analysis of Finland24-discussion forum].” Sananjalka [Journal of the Finnish Language Society ]
60
.
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vit Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, Vit Suchomel. 2014. “The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On”. Lexicography: Journal of ASIALEX 1,1: 7–36.
Kleinke, Sonja. 2010. “Interactive Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication. Disagreement in an English and German Public News Group.” In Discourses in Interaction, ed. by Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo, Marjut Johansson and Mia Raitaniemi, 195–222. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Krotz, Friedrich. 2014. “Mediatization as a Mover in Modernity: Social and Cultural Change in the Context of Media Change.” In: Mediatization of Communication, ed. by Knut Lundby, 131–162. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.
Livingstone, Sonia. 2009. “On the Mediation of Everything: ICA Presidential Address 2008.” Journal of Communication 59: 1–18.
Livnat, Zohar. This volume. "You bring the steaks, I'll bring the salad". “Presenting Ordinariness in PM Netanyahu's Public Talks.”
Louw, Bill. 1993. “Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer? The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies.” In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, ed. by Mona Baker, Gill Francis. & Elena Tognini-Bonelli, 157–176. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lunt, Peter, and Sonia Livingstone. 2016. “Is ‘Mediatization’ the New Paradigm for our Field? A Commentary on Deacon and Stanyer 2014, 2015) and Hepp, Hjarvard and Lundby 2015).” Media, Culture & Society 38, 3: 462–470.
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2010. A Private Sphere. Democracy in a Digital Age. Cambridge, UK & Malden, USA: Polity Press.
. 2014. “On Networked Publics and Private Spheres in Social Media.” In The Social Media Handbook, ed. by Theresa Senft, and Jeremy, T. M., Hunsinger, 109–119. London/New York: Routledge.
Partington, Allen. 2004. ““Utterly content in each other’s company”: Semantic Prosody and Semantic Preference.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9 (1): 131–156.
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. “On Doing ‘Being Ordinary’.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. M Atkinson and J. Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scannell, Paddy. 1991. “Introduction: The Relevance of Talk.” In Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, 1–13. London: Sage.
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1981. "Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction". In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.
Trampus, Mitja and Novak, Blaz. 2012. “The Internals of an Aggregated Web News Feed”.
Proceedings of 15th Multiconference on Information Society
. [URL], acc. 3 July 2018.
Van Dijk, Teun. 2006. “Ideology and Discourse Analysis”. Journal of Political Ideologies 11, 11: 115–140. .
Weizman, Elda. 2008. Positioning in Media Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2011–2012. “Positioning in Context: A Scale of Directness.” Xelkat Lashon 43–44: 331–345. (in Hebrew)
. 2015. “Irony in and through Follow-Ups: Talk and Meta-talk in Online Commenting”. In The Dynamics of Political Discourse, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence Berlin, 173–194, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Weizman, Elda and Anita Fetzer (eds.), 2015. Follow-Ups in Political Discourse: Explorations Across Contexts and Discourse Domains. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Weizman, Elda and Dori-Hacohen, Gonen, 2017. “On-Line Commenting on Opinion Editorials: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Face Work in the Washington Post (USA) and NRG (Israel).” Discourse, Context & Media 19: 39–48.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Weizman, Elda & Anita Fetzer
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021. Introduction. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
