Cover not available

In:The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres
Edited by Anita Fetzer and Elda Weizman
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 307] 2019
► pp. 73–101

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Quoting ordinary people in Prime Minister’s Questions

 | University of Augsburg, Germany
 | Universities of York and Salford, UK
Published online: 12 December 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.307.04ani
Abstract
Prime Minister’s Questions is the central British parliamentary institution. Every week Members of Parliament have the opportunity to pose questions to the Prime Minister, frequently utilising quotations from various sources, e.g. allies from the quoter’s political party, political opponents, experts, or ordinary people. The focus of this contribution is on the strategic use of quotations from ordinary people in the interchanges between the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition. The data comprise 240 question-response sequences. In the sequences analysed, quotations make up 9% of the total word count for Cameron-Miliband and 10% for Cameron-Corbyn: 2% of the quotations are sourced by ordinary people in the Cameron-Miliband data, and 31% in the Cameron-Corbyn data. Corbyn’s systematic use of quotations from ordinary people was novel, foregrounding their political issues and assigning them the status of an object of discourse in the media thus making the government accountable to them.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Quotation
    • 2.1Linguistic formatting
    • 2.2Discursive functions
  • 3.Ordinary people and ordinariness
  • 4.The representation of ordinary people and ordinary-life experience by non-ordinary politicians
    • 4.1Method
      • 4.1.1Participants
      • 4.1.2Apparatus
      • 4.1.3Procedure
    • 4.2Results
    • 4.3Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (24)
References
Antaki, Charles and Ivan Leudar. 2001. “Recruiting the Record: Using Opponents' Exact Words in Parliamentary Argumentation.” Text 21(4): 467–488.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brendel, Elke, Jörg Meibauer and Markus Steinbach. 2011. “Exploring the Meaning of Quotation.” In Understanding Quotation, ed. by Elke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer and Markus Steinbach, 1–33. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle and Ingrid Van Alphen. 2012. “Introductory Remarks on New and Old Quotatives.” In Quotatives. Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller and Ingrid Van Alphen, xi–xxx, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven. 1995. “Defining Moments, Presidential Debates, and the Dynamics of Quotability.” Journal of Communication 45(3): 118–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2013. “The Multilayered and Multifaceted Nature of Political Discourse.” The Pragmatics of Political Discourse. Explorations across Cultures, ed. by Anita Fetzer, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “‘When you came into office you said that your government would be different’: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse.” In The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin, 245–273. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Elisabeth Reber. 2015. “Quoting in Political Discourse: Professional Talk Meets Ordinary Postings. In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, ed. by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 97–124. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Elda Weizman. 2018. “‘What I would say to John and everyone like John is …’: The Construction of Ordinariness Through Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 29(5): 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David 1988. “A Turn-Taking System for British News Interviews.” Language in Society 17: 401–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1992. “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2003. “Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates.” Journal of Language and Politics 2(1): 71–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
May, Thomas Erskine. 2004. Parliamentary Practice. London: LexisNexis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oishi, Etsuko and Anita Fetzer. 2016. “Expositives in Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 96: 49–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. “On Doing ‘Being Ordinary’”. In Structures of Social Action, ed. by Max Atkinson and John Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schäffner, Christina and Susan Bassnett (eds.). 2010. Political Discourse, Media and Translation. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars PublishingGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 1993. Elite Discourse and Racism. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinberger, David. 2011. Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now that the Facts aren’t the Facts, Experts are Everywhere, and the Smartest person in the Room is the Room. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda. 2011. “Conveying Indirect Reservations Through Discursive Redundancy.” Language Sciences 33(2): 295–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2011. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Alkhawaldeh, Asim Ayed
2024. Quotations in Jordanian Parliamentary Discourse: A Pragma-Discourse Perspective. In Not My Words [The Language of Politics, ], ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Andone, Corina & Menno H. Reijven
2024. Quoting as an Argumentative Strategy in Dutch Televised Election Debates. In Not My Words [The Language of Politics, ], ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2022. Small stories and accountability of discursive action in mediated political discourse: Contextualisation and recontextualisation of ordinary and not-so-ordinary participants. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2024. Quotation headlines in the printed British quality press. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2025.  Being sensible is now a radical concept I LOVE that quote haha . Internet Pragmatics 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita & Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka
2021. Argumentative, Political and Legal Discourse. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 520 ff. DOI logo
Bull, Peter
2020. Meeting the media as a political psychologist. History & Philosophy of Psychology 21:1 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Bull, Peter, Anita Fetzer & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. Calling Mr Speaker ‘Mr Speaker’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Reber, Elisabeth
2020. Visuo-material performances. AILA Review 33 ► pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue