In:The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres
Edited by Anita Fetzer and Elda Weizman
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 307] 2019
► pp. 1–17
Introduction
Published online: 12 December 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.307.01wei
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.307.01wei
Article outline
- 1.Ordinariness and ethnomethodology
- 2.Ordinariness and positioning theory
- 3.Ordinariness and genre theory
- 4.Mediated ordinariness
- This volume
Acknowledgement Notes References
References (51)
Alexander, Jeffrey C. and Bernhard Giesen. 1987. “Introduction.” In The Micro-Macro Link, Jeffrey C. Alexander et al. (eds.), 1–42. Berkley: The University of California Press.
Bayat, Asef. 2013. Life as Politics. How Ordinary People Change the Middle East. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bhaya Nair, Rukmini. 2017. “Famous Politicians, Infamous Progeny: Being Ordinary Onscreen when you are a dynastic Heir Apparent in the Indian Context.” Paper presented at the IPrA conference, Belfast.
Boyd, Michael S. 2014. “(New) Participatory Framework on YouTube? Commenter Interaction in US Political Speeches.” Journal of Pragmatics 72: 46–58.
Cap, Piotr and Ursula Okulska (eds.) 2013. Analyzing Genres in Political Communication. Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
D’Ancona, Matthew. 2017. Post Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. London: Ebury Press.
Davies, Bronwyn and Rom Harré. 1990. “Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1): 43–63.
. 1998. “Political Discourse in the Media: An Analytical Framework.” In Approaches to Media Discourse, ed. by Allan Bell and Peter Garret, 142–162. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fetzer, Anita. 2000. “Negotiating Validity Claims in Political Interviews.” Text & Talk 20(4): 1–46.
. 2002. “‘Put bluntly, you have something of a credibility problem’. Sincerity and Credibility in Political Interviews.” In Politics as Talk and Text: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. by Paul Chilton and Christina Schäffner, 173–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2006. “Minister, we will see how the public judges you”. Media References in Political Interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 38(2): 180–195.
. 2007. “‘Well if that had been true that would have been perfectly reasonable’: Appeals to Reasonableness in Political Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 39(8): 1342–1359.
. 2016. “Political Interviews and Responsibility: A Case Study of its Interactional Organization.” In Responsibility in Discourse and the Discourse of Responsibility, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Anna Solin, 163–196. Equinox: Sheffield.
. 2018. “And you know, Jeremy, my father came from a very poor background indeed”: Collective Identities and the Private-Public Interface in Political Discourse. In The Discursive Construction of Identities in Online and Offline Contexts: Personal – Group – Collective, ed. by Birte Bös, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin and Nuria Hernandez, 227–247. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fetzer, Anita, Elda Weizman and Lawrence Berlin (eds.). 2015. The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Fetzer, Anita and Peter Bull. 2013. “Political Interviews in Context.” In Analyzing Genres in Political Communication, ed. by Piotr Cap and Urzula Okulska, 73–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fetzer, Anita and Elda Weizman. 2018. “‘What I would say to John and everyone like John is …’: The Construction of Ordinariness Through Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 29(5): 1–19.
Goebel, Zane. 2016. “Represented Speech: Private Lives in Public Talk“. Pragmatics 26(1): 51–67.
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New-York: Academic Press.
Gumperz, John J. 1992. “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, , 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1996. “The Linguistic and Cultural Relativity of Inference. In Rethinking lLnguistic Relativity, ed. by John J. Gumperz and Steven.C. Levinson, , 374–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gumperz, John J. 2003. “Response Essay.” In Language and Interaction. Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. by Susan Eerdmans et al., 105–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Harré, Rom and Luk van Langenhove (eds). 1999. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kampf, Zohar. 2013. “Mediated Performatives.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Landert, Daniela and Andreas Jucker. 2011. “Private and Public Mass Media Communication: From Letters to the Editor to Online Commentaries.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1422–1434.
Linell, Per. 1998. Approaching Dialogue. Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Livingstone, Sonja and Peter Lunt. 1994. Talk on Television. Audience Participation and Public Talk. London: Routledge.
Luckmann, Thomas. 1995. “Interaction Planning and Intersubjective Adjustment of Perspectives by Communicative Genres.” In Social Intelligence and Interaction, ed. by Ester Goody, 175–188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. “On Doing ‘Being Ordinary.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by Max Atkinson and John Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John. 2010. Making the Social World. The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University.
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie. 2007. “Lay and Expert Voices in Public Participation Programmes: A case of Generic Heterogeneity“. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1420–1435.
Thibault, Paul. 2003. “Contextualization and Social Meaning-Making Practices.” In Language and Interaction. Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. by Susan L. Eerdmans et al., 41–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tolson, Andrew. 1991. “Televised Chat and the Synthetic Personality“. In Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, 176–200. London: Sage.
Waller, James E. 2007. Becoming Evil. How Ordinary People Commit Genocide and Mass Murder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ward, Keith, Cliff Bowan and Andrew Kakabadse. 2007. Extraordinary Performance from Ordinary People. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Weizman, Elda. 1998. “Individual Intentions and Collective Purpose: The Case of News Interviews”. In Dialogue Analysis VI, ed. by Svetla Cmejrkovà, Jana Hoffmanovà, Olga Müllerovà and Jindra Svetlà, 269–280. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Weizman, E. 2003. “News Interviews on Israeli Television: Normative Expectations and Discourse Norms”. In Dialogue Analysis 2000, ed. by Sorin Stati and Marina Bondi, 383–394. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Weizman, Elda. 2006. Roles and Identities in News Interviews: The Israeli context. Journal of Pragmatics 38, 154–179.
. 2008. Positioning in Media Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2013. “Political Irony: Constructing Reciprocal Positioning in the News Interview”. In: Fetzer, Anita(ed.). The Pragmatics of Political Discourse: Explorations across Cultures, 167–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2014. “Ami et Ennemi, Frère et Déserteur : une Grille de Positionnements Complexes”. Argumentation et Analyse du Discours 12. [URL].
Weizman, Elda and Anita Fetzer (eds.). 2015. Follow-Ups in Political Discourse: Explorations across Contexts and Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Fetzer, Anita
2022. Doing things with discourse in the mediated political arena. Pragmatics and Society 13:5 ► pp. 769 ff.
Weizman, Elda & Zohar Livnat
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
