Cover not available

In:Reference and Identity in Public Discourses
Edited by Ursula Lutzky and Minna Nevala
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 306] 2019
► pp. 181–202

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

After we #VoteLeave we can #TakeControl

Political campaigning and imagined collectives on Twitter before the Brexit vote

 | University of Reading
 | University of Reading
Published online: 21 October 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.306.07jaw
Abstract
This study explores the use of personal pronouns in the context of political agitation on Twitter in the run-up to the EU referendum 2016. Using a combination of corpus linguistic and discourse analytical techniques, it shows notable differences in the way in which personal pronouns were employed by Leavers and Remainers. In particular, we emerged as a significant factor distinguishing the online rhetoric of the two camps with Leavers using we more often and in a much more versatile manner. This study contributes to the growing body of research on ambient affiliations in political communication offering insights into the ways in which personal pronouns are strategically deployed to create imagined collectives for the purpose of political bonding and agitation online.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The role of pronouns in political persuasion
  • 3.Data and methods
  • 4.Results and discussion
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Outlook
  • Notes
  • References
References (41)
References
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
boyd, danah, Scott Golder, and Gilad Lotan. 2010. “Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter.” Paper presented in Proceedings of 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2010.
boyd, danah. 2011. “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications.” In A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, ed. by Zizi Papacharissi, 39–58. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brader, Ted. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayton, Dewey. 2007. “The Audacity of Hope.” Journal of Black Studies 38 (1): 51–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coesemans, Roel, and Barbara De Cock. 2017. “Self-Reference by Politicians on Twitter: Strategies to Adapt to 140 Characters.” Journal of Pragmatics 116: 37–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cramer, Jennifer. 2010. “‘Do We Really Want to Be Like Them?’: Indexing Europeanness through Pronominal Use.” Discourse & Society 21 (6): 619–637. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Fina, Anna, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2012. Analyzing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Fina, Anna. 1995. “Pronominal Choice, Identity, and Solidarity in Political Discourse.” Text 15 (3): 379–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Fatta, Guiseppe, James J. Reade, Sylvia Jaworska, and Anupam Nanda. 2015. “Big Social Data and Political Sentiment: The Tweet Stream during the UK General Election 2015 Campaign.” Paper presented in Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart City/SocialCom/SustainCom (SmartCity), Chengdu, 293–298.
Dunning, Ted. 1993. “Accurate Methods for the Statistics of Surprise and Coincidence.” Computational Linguistics 19 (1): 61–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2014. “‘Judge Us on What We Do’: The Strategic Use of Collective We in British Political Discourse.” In Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ across Languages and Contexts, ed. by Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou, 331–350. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2007. Small Stories, Interaction and Identities. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Small Stories Transposition and Social Media: A Micro-Perspective on the ‘Greek Crisis’.” Discourse & Society 25 (4): 519–539. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grčar, Miha, Darko Cherepnalkoski, Igor Mozetic, and Petra Kralj Novak. 2017. “Stance and Influence of Twitter Users Regarding the Brexit Referendum.” Computational Social Networks 4 (6). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Humphreys, Lee, Phillipa Gill, Balachander Krishnamurthy, and Elizabeth Newbury. 2013. “Historicizing New Media: A Content Analysis of Twitter.” Journal of Communication 63 (3): 413–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jungherr, Andreas. 2014. “The Logic of Political Coverage on Twitter: Temporal Dynamics and Content.” Journal of Communication 64 (2): 239–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Eric. 2016. “It’s NOT the Economy, Stupid: Brexit as a Story of Personal Values.” LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) (blog). 9 July 2016. Available online at [URL] (accessed 15 April 2019).
Kazin, Michael. 1995. The Populist Persuasion. The American History. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Rychlý, Pavel Smrz, and David Tugwell. 2004. “The Sketch Engine.” Paper presented in Proceedings of EURALEX 200, Lorient, France, 105–116.
Kleinke, Sonja, and Birte Bös. 2018. “Indeterminate Us and Them: The Complexities of Referentiality, Identity and Group Construction in a Public Online Discussion.” In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline, ed. by Birte Bös, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin, and Nuria Hernández, 153–176. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky. 1967. “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, ed. by June Helm, 12–19. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice, and danah boyd. 2010. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society 13 (1): 114–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter, and Rom Harré. 1990. Pronouns and People. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2015. “Dehumanizing Metaphors in UK Immigrant Debates in Press and Online Media.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3 (1): 41–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Page, Ruth. 2012. Stories and Social Media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2015. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula. 2014. “Constructing Collectivity with ‘We’. An Introduction.” In Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ across Languages and Contexts, ed. by Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou, 1–19. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Geoffrey Leech, and Sidney Greenbaum. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sadler, Neil. 2018. “Narrative and Interpretation on Twitter: Reading Tweets by Telling Stories.” New Media & Society 20 (9): 3266–3282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tumasjan, Andranik, Timm O. Sprenger, Phillipp G. Sander, and Isabell M. Welpe. 2010. “Election Forecasts with Twitter: How 140 Characters Reflect the Political Landscape.” Social Science Computer Review 29 (4): 402–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyrkkö, Jukka. 2016. “Looking for Rhetorical Thresholds: Pronoun Frequencies in Political Speeches.” In The Pragmatics and Stylistics of Identity Construction and Characterisation (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 17), ed. by Minna Nevala, Ursula Lutzky, Gabriella Mazzon, and Carla Suhr. Helsinki: VARIENG. Available online at [URL] (accessed 15 April 2019).
Van Kessel, Stijn, and Remco Castelein. 2016. “Shifting the Blame. Populist Politicians’ Use of Twitter as a Tool of Opposition.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 12 (2): 594–614.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 1995. “Representing Social Action.” Discourse & Society 6 (1): 81–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, John. 1990. Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart. 1999. Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2014. “Enacting Identity in Microblogging through Ambient Affiliation.” Discourse & Communication 8 (2): 209–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Jaworska, Sylvia, Michael K. Goodman & Iwona Gibas
2024. The Making of #CovidTwitter: Who Were the Loudest “Covid Influencers” and What Did They Say About the COVID-19 Pandemic?. Social Media + Society 10:1 DOI logo
Della Giusta, Marina, Sylvia Jaworska & Danica Vukadinović Greetham
2021. Expert communication on Twitter: Comparing economists’ and scientists’ social networks, topics and communicative styles. Public Understanding of Science 30:1 ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
McIntosh, Janet
2020. Introduction: The Trump Era as a Linguistic Emergency. In Language in the Trump Era, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Janet McIntosh & Norma Mendoza-Denton
2020. Language in the Trump Era, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue