Cover not available

In:The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems: A comparative approach
Edited by Paul Bouissac
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 304] 2019
► pp. 253–288

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 11
Address, reference and sequentiality in Indonesian conversation

 | The University of Melbourne
 | The University of Sydney
Published online: 23 July 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.304.11ewi
Abstract
Indonesian has an open pronoun system that provides speakers with a range of first and second person terms. Drawing on data from informal conversation, we examine second person expressions used for address and reference in sequence initiating actions in multiparty interaction. Previous work on English has shown that address and reference are bound up in the systematics of turn taking, and that these practices are context-sensitive. We show this is also the case for Indonesian and that: (a) variation in sequential placement of person terms does stancetaking work; (b) speakers can choose between long and short forms of a name, with short names regularly used for strong exhorting, often in a double-address structure spanning two intonation units; (c) the availability of multiple second person terms means that, unlike a language with limited second person terms such as English, second person reference can also achieve explicit addressing; (d) indeterminacy in both the structure and social action of an utterance can arise due to the frequency of allusive reference and the flexibility of word order in Indonesian. Our study contributes to current literature by showing how the dynamics of address and reference play out in a language with a much richer and varied set of person terms than English has.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Overview of person terms in Indonesian
  • 3.Position of Address relative to sequence-initiating action
  • 4.Explicit use of reference terms
  • 5.Ambiguity between address and reference
  • 6.Address does not always mean expected recipiency
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Abbreviations
  • Transciption conventions
  • Notes
  • References
References (42)
References
Agha, A. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, S. E. (2010). Address terms in the service of other actions: The case of news interview talk. Discourse and Communication, 4(2), 161–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Agency in response: The role of prefatory address terms. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 290–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cumming, S. (1991). Functional change: The case of Malay constituent order. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Djenar, D. N. (2006). Patterns and variation of address terms in colloquial Indonesian. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 29(2), 22.1-22.16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Which self? Pronominal choice, modernity, and self-categorizations. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 189(1), 31–54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Pronouns and sociospatial ordering in conversation and fiction. In L. Gardelle & S. Sorlin (Eds.), The pragmatics of personal pronouns (pp. 195–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Djenar, D. N., Ewing, M. C., & Manns, H. (2018). Style and intersubjectivity in youth interaction. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W., & Kärkkäinen, E. (2012). Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk, 32(4), 433–451.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2003). Demonstratives in space and interaction: Data from Lao speakers and implications for semantic analysis. Language, 79(1), 82–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Meanings of the unmarked: How ‘default’ person reference does more than just refer. In N. J. Enfield & Tanya Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives (pp.97–120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J., & Sidnell, J. (2017). On the concept of action in the study of interaction. Discourse Studies, 19(5), 515–535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. & Stivers, T. (Eds). (2007). Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Englebretson, R. (2007). Grammatical resources for social purposes: Some aspects of stancetaking in colloquial Indonesian conversation. In R. Englebretson, (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 69–110). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Errington, J. J. (1998). Shifting languages: Interaction and identity in Javanese Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ewing, M. C. (2005). Colloquial Indonesian. In A. Adelaar & N. P. Himmelmann (Eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar (pp. 227–258). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). The kalau framing construction in Indonesian comics. In D. N. Djenar (Ed.), Linguistic Studies of Languages in and Around Indonesia, Youth language in Indonesia and Malaysia NUSA 58, 51–72, [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Localising person reference among Indonesian youth. In Z. Goebel, D. Cole & H. Manns (Eds.), Margins, hubs, and peripheries in a decentralizing Indonesia ([Special Issue]. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies 162), 26–41, [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(In press). The predicate as a locus of grammar and interaction in colloquial Indonesian. Studies in Language.
Goffman, E. (1983). Felicity’s condition. American Journal of Sociology 89(1), 1–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaswanti Purwo, B. (1984). The categorical system in contemporary Indonesian: Pronouns. In J. Verhaar (Ed.), Towards a description of contemporary Indonesian: Part II (NUSA, Linguistic Studies in Indonesian and Languages of Indonesia 19), 55–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiesling, S. (2009). Style as stance: Stance as the explanation for patterns of sociolinguistic variation. In A. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 171–194). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kridalaksana, H. (1974). Second participant in Indonesian address. Language Sciences 31, 17–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1996). On the formal and functional relationship between topics and vocatives: Evidence from French. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language (pp. 267–288). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1999). The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In H. Hasselgård & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in honour of Sitg Johansson (pp. 107–120). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32(2), 177–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manns, H. (2011) Stance, style and identity in Java. PhD Thesis, Department of Linguistics, Monash University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noel Aziz Hanna, P. & Sonnenhauser, B. (2013). Vocatives as functional performance structures. In B. Sonnenhauser & P. Noel Aziz Hanna (Eds.), Vocative!: Addressing between system and performance (pp. 283–303). Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In C. Goodwin & A. Duranti (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 335–358). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50, 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70, 1075–1095. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Sequence organization in interaction, Volume 1: A primer in Conversation Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, J. & M. Shohet. (2013). The problems of peers in Vietnamese interaction. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19, 618–638. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simons, G. F. & C. D. Fennig (Eds.). (2018). Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 21st edition. Dallas, TX: SIL International. Online version: [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sneddon, J. N. (2006). Colloquial Jakartan Indonesian. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sneddon, J. N., Adelaar, A., Djenar, D. N., & M. C. Ewing. (2010). Indonesian: A comprehensive grammar, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T. & Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35, 367–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tamtomo, K. (2012). Multilingual youth, literacy practices, and globalization in an Indonesian city: A preliminary exploration. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies 41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. & Everett, D. L. (2001). Pronoun borrowing. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 27, 301–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Blythe, Joe, Fakry Hamdani & Scott Barnes
2024. Tactile engagement of prospective next speakers in Indonesian multiparty conversations. Language in Society 53:4 ► pp. 671 ff. DOI logo
Ewing, Michael C.
2024. Elusive referentiality and allusive reference in Indonesian conversation. In (Non)referentiality in Conversation [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 344], ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Djenar, Dwi Noverini
2023. Referring to the self and the addressee overtly. In Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series, 228], ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Djenar, Dwi Noverini
2024. Levelling, differentiation and structure of feeling: Address and interlocutor reference in Indonesian political interviews. Discourse & Society 35:4 ► pp. 434 ff. DOI logo
Abtahian, Maya Ravindranath, Abigail C. Cohn, Dwi Noverini Djenar & Rachel C. Vogel
2021. Jakarta Indonesian first-person singular pronouns. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 7:2 ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. The Mysterious Address Term anata 'you' in Japanese [Topics in Address Research, 4], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue