Cover not available

In:The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems: A comparative approach
Edited by Paul Bouissac
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 304] 2019
► pp. 151–203

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 7
The dynamics of Nepali pronominal distinctions in familiar, casual and formal relationships

 | University of Bern
Published online: 23 July 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.304.07van
Abstract
Nepali uses various morphological means formally to distinguish at least five levels of deference in verbal interaction. In addition to the three Nepali second person pronouns, for each of which the Nepali verb distinguishes separate conjugated forms, Nepali speakers also make use of the deferentially conjugated verb in combination with the respectful term hajur or with kinship terms to give expression to different levels of deference and formality. Moreover, the Nepali verb distinguishes a separate mediopassively conjugated construction used exclusively when the notional subject of the sentence is a member of the former royal family. Speakers can also exploit the device of the ambiguous avoidance term āphu ‘self’ or make oblique reference to the second person through the use of the first person plural when a speaker is uncertain of the register which would be most appropriate.
Unlike the simple two-term system found in many Western languages, such as French tu vs. vous, the choice of pronoun and conjugation between intimate friends and indeed between higher caste married couples tends to be highly asymmetrical. The semiotics of this asymmetry is commensurate with the degree of intimacy which the two individuals feel towards each other. This phenomenon, strikingly unfamiliar to the contemporary Occidental, illustrates rather vividly how different the sensibilities and semantic underpinnings of the many tiers of deference expressed by pronominal usage and other morphological parameters in Nepali are from those of an intimate interaction whereby the two European individuals might simply be able to tutoyer each other. A descriptive account is provided of actual usage, and an analytical exposition of the semiotics of this morphologically diverse system of indexing relationships in Nepali speech is presented.
Article outline
  • The second person in Nepali
  • Growing up in a pronominal world
  • Talking to the in-laws
  • Society as one big family
  • The awkward self
  • Royal or courtly forms
  • Grammar and history repeat themselves
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (39)
References
Aryāl, Bala Rām. 2010. Nepali Language, Simplified Handbook of Nepali Language for Its Expatriate Learners. Kathmandu: ShiSham Prakashan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ayton, Jason Alexander. 1820. A Grammar of the Népalese Language. Calcutta: Hindoostanee Press by Philip Pereira.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braun, Friederike. 1988. Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1960. ‘The pronouns of power and solidarity’, pp. 253–276 in Thomas Albert Sebeok, ed., Style in Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buḍā Magar, Harṣa Bahādur Bhādra 2053 (ad 1996). Magar jāti ra unkā sāmājik saṃskār. Kathmandu: Śrīmatī Pupāvatī Buḍā Magar Magar (esp. pp.61–72).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Thomas Welbourne. 1963. Introduction to Nepali. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davids, Irene Maria Hendrina, and George van Driem. 1985. ‘Limbu kinship terminology: a description’, Kailash, Journal of Himalayan Studies, xii (1–2): 115–156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doherty, Victor S. 1974. ‘The organizing principles of Gurung kinship’, Kailash, ii (4): 273–301.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Driem, George. 1987. A Grammar of Limbu. West Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. A Grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Languages of the Himalayas: An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region, containing an Introduction to the Symbiotic Theory of Language (two volumes). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. ‘The morphosyntax of Himalayan languages’, Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Linguistics. New York: Oxford. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Fürer Haimendorf, Christoph. 1956. ‘Ethnographic note on the Tamangs of Nepal’, Eastern Anthropologist, 9: 166–177.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grunow-Hårsta, Karen Anne. 2013. A Descriptive Grammar of Two Magar Dialects of Nepal: Tanahu and Syangja Magar. Ann Arbor: Proquest.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glover, Warren William, Jessie R. Glover and Deu Bahadur Gurung. 1977. Gurung-Nepali-English Dictionary with English-Gurung and Nepali-Gurung Indices. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Andrew R. 1978. ‘Preliminary report on the Langtang region’, Contributions to Nepalese Studies, 5 (2): 51–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Höfer, András. 1969. ‘Preliminary report on a field research in a Western Tamang group, Nepal’, Bulletin of the International Committee for Urgent Anthropological and Ethnological Research, 11: 17–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jain, Dhanesh Kumar. 1969. ‘Verbalization of respect in Hindi’, Anthropological Linguistics, 11 (3): 79–97.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1973. Pronominal Usage in Hindi: A Sociolinguistic Study. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korolëv, Nikolaj Ivanovič. 1965. Jazyk Nepali. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1968. ‘Kratkij očerk grammatiki jazyka Nepali’, pp. 1211–1328 in Izrail’ Samojlovič Rabinovič, Nikolaj Ivanovič Korolëv and Aganina Ljudmila Aleksandrovna, eds., Nepal’sko-Russkij Slovar’. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo ‘Sovetskaja Ènciklopedija’.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd. 1996. L’inférentiel du Népali, pp. 109–123 in Zlatka Guentchéva, ed., L’énonciation médiatisée. Louvain: Péeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oppitz, Michael. 1982. ‘Death and kin amongst the Northern Magar’, Kailash, ix (4): 377–421.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orwell, George. 1945. Animal Farm: A Fairy Story. London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pignède, Bernard. 1966 [posthumous]. Les Gurungs, une population himalayenne du Népal. Paris et La Haye: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rāṇā, Prabhākar Śamśer Jaṅg Bahādur, and Paśupati Śamśer Jaṅg Bahādur Rāṇā and Gautam Śamśer Jaṅg Bahādur Rāṇā. 2002. The Ranas of Nepal. New Delhi: Georges Naef.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Regmi, Ambika. 2013. A Grammar of Magar Kaike. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Analyzed texts of Magar Kaike. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sālokya सालोक्य. 2011. बधाई छ बाबुराम सरकारलाई, रेकर्ड तोडेकोमा Badhāī cha Bāburām Sarkārlāī, rekarḍ toḍekomā (13 November 2011) <[URL]>.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ruth L. 1976. ‘The Nepali system of honorific registers’, Kailash, iv (3): 213–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sever, Adrian. 1993. Nepal under the Ranas: Photographs from the Collection of Jharendra Shumsher Jang Bahadur Rana. Sittingbourne: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shrestha, Padma Prakash, ed. 1986. Nepal Rediscovered: The Rana Court 1846–1951: Photographs of the Archives of the Nepal Kingdom Foundation. New Delhi: Time Books International.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sirhandi, Marcella. 2009. Royal Nepal Through the Lens of Richard Gordon Matzen. Chicago: Serindia Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tripāṭhī, Vasudev, and Ballabh Maṇi Dāhāl, eds., vs 2040 (i.e. ad 1983–84). Nepālī Br̥hat Śabdakoś. Kathmandu: Nepāl Rājakīya Prajñā-Pratiṣṭhān.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turin, Mark. 2001. ‘Call me uncle: An outsider’s experience of Nepali kinship’, Contributions to Nepalese Studies, 28 (2): 277–283.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, Ralph Lilley. 1931. A Comparative and Etymological Dictionary of the Nepali Language. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uccastarīya samiti. vs 2058 [ad 2001]. श्री ५ महाराजािधराज सरकारका जुनाफमा नारायणहिटी राजदरबारको २०५८ जेठ १९ को घटना सम्बन्धमा तथ्य जाहेर गर्न गिठत उच्चस्तरीय समितिले जाहेर गरेको प्रतिवेदन Śrī 5 Mahārājādhirāj sarkār-kā junāph-mā Nārāyaṇhiṭī rājdarbār-ko 2058 Jeṭh 19 ko ghaṭanā sambandh-mā tathya jāher garna gaṭhit uccastarīya samiti-le jāher gareko prativedan. Kathmandu: His Majesty’s Government of Nepal [315 pp.].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verma, M. K., and T. N. Sharma. 1979. Intermediate Nepali Structure (two volumes). New Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vinding, Michael. 1979. ‘A preliminary report on kinship terminologies of the Bodish section of Sino-Tibetan speaking peoples’, Kailash, vii (3–4): 191–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue