Cover not available

In:The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems: A comparative approach
Edited by Paul Bouissac
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 304] 2019
► pp. 99–132

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 5
T-V address practices in Italian

Diachronic, diatopic, and diastratic analyses

 | Université catholique de Louvain
 | Université catholique de Louvain
Published online: 23 July 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.304.05mae
Abstract
The aim of this research was to examine the Italian pronouns of address by means of (1) diachronic, (2) diatopic, and (3) diastratic analyses. Drawing on corpus linguistics, we compiled a two million-word corpus made up of narrative texts written by both men and women writers from the Italian classic literature. (1) Our outcomes confirm that the most recurrent pronoun is tu, whereas Voi and Lei quantitatively come after. With respect to politeness strategies, the pronoun Voi appeared with a higher frequency during the 19th century, whereas Lei was more recurrent during the 20th and the 21st centuries. (2) Our data suggest that, unpredictably, both pronouns tu and Lei would be idiosyncratic to Southerners and Voi to Northerners in our diachronic corpus, whereas both tu and Voi appear to be typical of individuals from the South and Lei from the North in our contemporary corpus. This also confirms some tendencies: the current regional use of Voi as the V-form in the South as well as the increase in the usage of tu. (3) Men writers would tend to be more polite than women authors. Besides, women writers who supported the fascist regime tended to make use of the pronoun Voi in order to comport with its politics of pronouns. On the contrary, antifascist women had the tendency to use the pronoun Lei. Contrary to the bulk of research, the outcomes of this research emphasise men’s politeness rather than women’s while adding up crucial data on the temporal evolution of the pronouns.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Contemporary address practises in Italian
  • 3.A historical survey
  • 4.Caveats
  • 5.Research questions and hypotheses
  • 6.Corpora
  • 7.Methodology
  • 8.Presentation of the results
    • 8.1.Diachronic analysis
    • 8.2Diatopic analysis
    • 8.3Diastratic analysis
  • 9.Men are politer than women
  • 10.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
References (74)
Bibliography
“Allocutivi, pronomi.” 2010. Enciclopedia dell’italiano. Roma: Treccani. Retrieved March 22 from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angle, John 1981. “Gender and Prestige Preference in Language”. Sex Roles 7 (4): 449–461. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano. 1980. La variabilità sociale della lingua. Torino: Loescher.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernardini, Petra. 2007. Tre romanzieri a confronto in una prospettiva femminista: Maraini, Moravia e Morante. Lunds Universitet, Lund.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Roger and Gilman, Albert. 1972. “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity”. In Language and Social Context, ed. by Pier Paolo Giglioli, 253–276. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruni, Francesco. 1992. L’italiano nelle regioni. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cadioli, Alberto, Decleva, Enrico, and Spinazzola, Vittorio. 1999. La Mediazione editoriale. Milano: Il saggiatore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Munaro, Nicola. 2009. Italiano, italiani regionali e dialetti. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Castellani, Arrigo 1982. “Quanti erano gli italofoni nel 1861?” Studi linguistici italiani 8: 3- 26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cicchetti, Angelo, and Mordenti, Raul. 1985. I libri di famiglia in Italia. Roma: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael G., Norrby, Catrin, and Warren, Jane. 2009. Language and human relations styles of address in contemporary language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coletti, Vittorio. 2015. Grammatica dell’italiano adulto: l’italiano di oggi per gli italiani di oggi. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comba, Eugenio. 1875. Breve corso razionale di grammatica italiana corredato di esercizi d’applicazione ad uso degli alunni delle scuole tecniche, normali e magistrali. Torino: Petrini.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko. M., and Burdelski, Matthew. 2017. “(Im)politeness: Language Socialization.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Daniel Z. Kádár, 255–279 Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel. 2004. A Basic Course in Anthropological Linguistics. Studies in Linguistic and Cultural Anthropology. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio. 1976. Storia linguistica dell’Italia unita (1. ed.). Roma, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Storia linguistica dell’Italia repubblicana dal 1946 ai nostri giorni. Roma, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Storia linguistica d’Italia dall’Unità a oggi (ebook ed.). Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Negri, F. A. 1868. Regole pratiche di grammatica italiana per uso dei soli toscani nelle scuole serali e rurali. Firenze: Cellini.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dogliani, Patrizia. 2008. Il fascismo degli italiani: una storia sociale. Torino: UTET Libreria.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2015. Umberto Eco: “Così il darci del Tu rischia di impoverire la nostra memoria e il nostro apprendimento”. La Repubblica, September 14. Retrieved 22 March 2018, from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, John. 2011. Challenges in the Social Life of Language. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felloni, Maria Chiara. 2011. Prosodia sociofonetica: l’italiano parlato e percepito a Parma. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Formentelli, Maicol, and Hajek, John. 2015. “Address in Italian academic interactions: the power of distance and (non)-reciprocity”. In Address practice as social action: European perspectives, ed. by Catrin Norrby and Camilla Wide, 632–652. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gordon, Elisabeth. 1997. “Sex, Speech, and Stereotypes: Why Women Use Prestige Speech Forms more often than Men”. Language in Society 26 (1): 47–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goudar, Luigi. 1810. Nuova grammatica italiana-francese, di Lodovico Goudar… Novissima edizione… repilogata riguardo a’ dittonghi da M. P., professore di lingua francese. Torino: Botta Prato e Paravia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granati, Cesare. 2014. Luigi Pirandello: vita e opere. Padova: Goodmood.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne. 1996. “Male-female speaking practices across cultures”. In Contrastive Sociolinguistics, ed. by Marlies Hellinger and Ulrich Ammon, 447–473. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatcher, Larry. 2003. Step-by-Step Basic Statistics Using SAS: Student Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Publisher.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1994. An introduction to sociolinguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Women, men and politeness. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howell, David. 2016. Fundamental Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iannaccone, Giuseppe. 1999. Il fascismo sintetico. Letteratura e ideologia negli anni Trenta. Milano: Greco e Greco.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. 1998. Les interactions verbales Tome 1 Approche interactionnelle et structure des conversations. Paris: Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kertesz-Vial, Elisabeth. 2014. “Luigi Pirandello dal 1929 al 1935: un improbabile esiliato volontario”. In Già troppe volte esuli. Letteratura di frontiera e di esilio, 2014, Vol. 3, ed. by Novella di Nunzio, and Francesco Ragni. Perugia: Università degli Studi di Perugia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1978. Sociolinguistic patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T. 1975. Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langer, Susan K. 1957. Philosophy in a new key; a study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art (3d ed.). Cambridge,: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lepschy, Anna. L., and Lepschy, Giulio. C. 1988. The Italian language today. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maeder, Costantino. 2018. La violenza nella letteratura italiana: problemi di definizione, problemi di percezione. In Linguaggi e paradigmi di violenza, memoria culturale e transculturalità: il caso italiano (1990–2015), ed. by Dagmar Reichardt, Rotraud V. Kulessa, Nora Moll, and Franca Sinopoli. Frankfurt, Bern: Peter Lang, forthcoming.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majello, Francesco. 1828. Gramatica [sic] italiana dei fanciulli. Napoli: Brescia e co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzeo, Michele. 2007. Vangelo e Lettere di Giovanni. Introduzione, esegesi e teologia. Alba: Paoline.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, Sara. 2012. “Rethinking Politeness, Impoliteness and Gender Identity”. In Discourse Analysis and Gender Identity, ed. by Lia Litosellitti. and Jane Sunderland, 69–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molinelli, Piera. 2002. “Lei non sa chi sono io!”: potere, solidarietà, rispetto e distanza nella comunicazione. Linguistica e filologia 14: 283–302.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Polite Forms and Sociolinguistic Dynamics in Contacts between Varieties of Italian.” In Contatto interlinguistico fra presente e passato, ed. By Carlo Consani, 283–313. Milano: LED.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mottura, Carlo, and Parato, Giovanni 1872. Cento regole di grammatica italiana con brevi nozioni e norme intorno ai principali generi di componimento ad uso delle classi elementari superiori. Torino: Paravia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niculescu, Alessandro. 1974. Strutture allocutive pronominali reverenziali in italiano. Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pascale, Céline-Marie. 2013. Social Inequality and The Politics of Representation. Newcastle upon Tyne: SAGE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pasquinelli, Carla, Cenci, Cristina, Manganelli, Silvia, and Guelfi, Valeria. 2005. Antropologia delle mutilazioni genitali femminili. Una ricerca in Italia. Roma: AIDOS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perrot, Michelle. 2009. Donne e uomini di fronte al potere. Bari: Gius.Laterza and Figli Spa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peruzzi, Emilio 1963. Problemi di grammatica italiana. Torino: ERI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pola, Paolo 1829. Francesa da Rimini. Venezia: Casali.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierangeli, Fabio and Barbaro, Patrizio. 1995. Pier Paolo Pasolini: biografia per immagini. Cavallermaggiore: Gribaudo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rebelos, Margareta, and Strambi, Antonella. 2009. “Address Pronouns in Italian CMC Exchanges: A ‘Good Example’ for L2 Learners?” Italica 86 (1): 59–79.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raffaelli, Lara Gocchin. 2009. “Una storia approfondita: Le lettere di Maria Messina ad Alessio Di Giovanni ed Enrico Bemporad, 1910 - 1940”. Italica, 86(3), 339-391.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scaglia, Claudia. 2003. “Deissi e cortesia in italiano”. Linguistica e filologia 16: 109–145.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serianni, Luca, and Castelvecchi, Alberto. 1989. Grammatica italiana: italiano comune e lingua letteraria, suoni, forme, costrutti. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Signorini, Andrea. July 24, 2017. Elementi di grammatica del dialetto lizzanese. Retrieved March 22 from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soave, Francesco. 1810. Gramatica ragionata della lingua italiana. Venezia: Santini.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spina, Stefania. 2014. “Il Perugia Corpus: una risorsa di riferimento per l’italiano. Composizione, annotazione e valutazione.” In Proceedings of the First Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2014, Vol. 1, ed. by In Roberto Basili, Alessandro Lenci, and Bernardo Magnini, 354–359. Pisa: Pisa University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter. 2002. Sociolinguistics: a resource book for students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tacchi, Francesca. (2000). Storia illustrata del fascismo. Firenze: Giunti.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Telmon, Tullio. 1993. “Varietà regionali.” In Introduzione all’italiano contemporaneo, ed. by A. Sobrero, 93–149. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. “Gli italiani regionali contemporanei.” In Storia della lingua italiana. Vol. 3, ed. by Luca Serianni and Pietro Trifone, 597–626. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tosi, Arturo. 2001. Language and society in a changing Italy. Clevedon; Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1972. “Sex, Covert Prestige and Linguistic Change in the Urban British English of Norwich.” Language and Society 1(2): 179–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urech, Giacomo. 1995. “Contributo alla conoscenza dei dialetti della Val Calanca. 5a parte.” Quaderni grigionitaliani 64 (2): 185–200.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vasta, Giorgio. 2010. Spaesamento. Roma, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincenti, Fiora. (1974). Lalla Romano. Firenze: La nuova Italia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vizmuller-Zocco, Jana. 1999. “Il sostrato dialettale nella deriva dell’italiano neo-standard.” Italica, 76 (4), 469–479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volpato, Chiara. 2013. Psicosociologia del maschilismo. Roma, Bari:Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald. 1993. Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zendralli, Arnoldo Marcelliano. 1952–1953. “Il dialetto di Roveredo di Mesolcina.” Quaderni grigionitaliani 22 (1): 190–200.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeno, Apostolo. 1701. Griselda. Venezia: Nicolini.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Flinz, Carolina, Eva Gredel & Laura Herzberg
2025. 421The negotiation of pronominal address on talk pages of the German, French, and Italian Wikipedia. In Exploring digitally-mediated communication with corpora, ► pp. 421 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue