Cover not available

In:The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems: A comparative approach
Edited by Paul Bouissac
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 304] 2019
► pp. 35–56

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 2
When we means you

The social meaning of English pseudo-inclusive personal pronouns

 | Macquarie University
Published online: 23 July 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.304.02wil
Abstract
This chapter uses qualitative and quantitative analysis of interactions collected in a New Zealand rugby team to analyse the way in which pronominal choice impacts upon the social dynamics of leadership discourse. In particular, the pseudo-inclusive first person plural pronoun is examined in terms of its solidarity enhancing effect and mitigation of leadership-focused speech acts. Pronominal use is analysed with reference to the sociolinguistic concept of stance alignment and how this can mitigate potential face-threat. The discussion considers that by including themselves with the addressees of an interaction, leaders can attenuate the illocutionary force of speech acts such as directives and criticism, whilst maximising the directness of their expression, and goes on to question the social function of pseudo-inclusive compliments.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature
    • 2.1Stance
    • 2.2Clusivity, stance and the pronominal system
    • 2.3Control acts, compliments and criticism
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Qualitative analysis
  • 5.Quantitative analysis
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • References
References (50)
References
Adachi, Chie. 2016. ‘Sugoi!–Indexicality and Stancetaking in Japanese Compliments’. Language in Society 45 (02): 193–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bass, Bernard M. 1990. Bass and Stodgill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. 3rd ed. New York; London; Toronto; Sydney; Singapore: The Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berry, Roger. 2009. ‘You Could Say That: The Generic Second-Person Pronoun in Modern English’. English Today 25 (03): 29–34.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope., and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics; 4. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1960. ‘The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity’. In Style in Language, ed. by T. A. Sebeok, 253–76. Cambridge, Massachussetts: MIT Press. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, Seongsook, and Stephanie Schnurr. 2014. ‘Exploring Distributed Leadership: Solving Disagreements and Negotiating Consensus in a “Leaderless” Team’. Discourse Studies 16 (1): 3–24.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Crevani, Lucia, Monica Lindgren, and Johann Packendorff. 2010. ‘Leadership, Not Leaders: On the Study of Leadership as Practices and Interactions’. Scandinavian Journal of Management 26 (1): 77–86.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Cysouw, Michael. 2003. The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. ‘Syncretisms Involving Clusivity’. Typological Studies i n Language 63: 73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cock, Barbara. 2011. ‘Why We Can Be You: The Use of 1st Person Plural Forms with Hearer Reference in English and Spanish’. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (11): 2762–75.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. 2016. ‘Register, Genre and Referential Ambiguity of Personal Pronouns’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 26 (3): 361– 378.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DuBois, John. 2007. ‘The Stance Triangle’. In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–82. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan, Jiansheng Guo, and Martin Lampert. 1990. ‘Politeness and Persuasion in Children’s Control Acts’. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 307–31.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Fraser, Bruce. 1980. ‘Conversational Mitigation’. Journal of Pragmatics 4 (4): 341–50.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golato, Andrea. 2003. ‘Studying Compliment Responses: A Comparison of DCTs and Recordings of Naturally Occurring Talk’. Applied Linguistics 24 (1): 90–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2007. ‘Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities’. Discourse & Society 18 (1): 53–73.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Gumperz, John Joseph. 1999. ‘On Interactional Sociolinguistic Method’. In Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discours e in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, ed. by Srikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts, 454–71. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haverkate, Henk. 1992. ‘Deictic Categories as Mitigating Devices’. Pragmatics 2 (4): 505–522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herbert, Robert K., and H. Stephen Straight. 1989. ‘Compliment-Rejection versus Compliment-Avoidance: Listener-Based versus Speaker-Based Pragmatic Strategies’. Language & Communication 9 (1): 35–47.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Holmes, Janet. 1984. ‘Modifying Illocutionary Force’. Journal of Pragmatics 8 (3): 345–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. ‘Compliments and Compliment Responses in New Zealand English’. Anthropological Linguistics 28 (4): 485–508.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. ‘Paying Compliments: A Sex-Preferential Positive Politeness Strategy’. Journal of Pragmatics 12 (3): 445–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. ‘Leadership Talk: How Do Leaders “Do Mentoring”, and Is Gender Relevant?’ Journal of Pragmatics 37 (11): 1779–1800. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. ‘Men, Masculinities and Leadership: Different Discourse Styles at Work’. In Gender and Spoken Interaction, ed. by Pia Pichler and Eva Eppler, 186–210. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Meredith Marra. 2004. ‘Leadership and Managing Conflict in Meetings’. Pragmatics 14 (4): 439–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Íñigo-Mora, Isabel. 2004. ‘On the Use of the Personal Pronoun We in Communities’. Journal of Language and Politics 3 (1): 27–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott Fabius. forthcoming. Stance and Stancetaking: Theory and Practice in Sociolinguistics. [URL]
. 2004. ‘Dude’. American Speech 79 (3): 281–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. ‘Style as Stance’. In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, edited by Alexandra M Jaffe, 171. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. ‘Stance in Context: Affect, Alignment and Investment in the Analysis of Stancetaking’. In IMean 2011. UWE Bristol. [URL]
Kitagawa, Chisato, and Adrienne Lehrer. 1990. ‘Impersonal Uses of Personal Pronouns’. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (5): 739–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1993. ‘Constructing Social Identity: A Language Socialization Perspective’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26 (3): 287–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oh, Sun-Young. 2010. ‘Invoking Categories through Co-Present Person Reference: The Case of Korean Conversation’. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (5): 1219–42.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Quirk, Randolph, S Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and J Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raelin, Joe. 2011. ‘From Leadership-as-Practice to Leaderful Practice’. Leadership 7 (2): 195–211.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Richards, Keith. 2010. ‘Professional Orientation in Back Region Humor’. Text & Talk– An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 30 (2): 145– 167.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Vine, Bernadette. 2004. Getting Things Done at Work: The Discourse of Power in Workplace Interaction. Pragmatics & Beyond, new ser. v. 124. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. ‘Directives at Work: Exploring the Contextual Complexity of Workplace Directives’. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (7): 1395–1405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wales, Katie. 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present -Day English. Cambridge [England]  ;New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wieczorek, Anna Ewa. 2009. ‘This Is to Say You’re Either in or out: Some Remarks on Clusivity’. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 3 (2): 118–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. ‘“And I Quote”: Direct and Indirect Point-of-View Switches in Clusivity-Oriented Discourse’. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6 (2): 229–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Nick. 2010. ‘Bros, Boys and Guys: Address Term Function and Communities of Practice in a New Zealand Rugby Team’. New Zealand English Journal 24: 33–54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. ‘Interaction without Walls: Analysing Leadership Discourse through Dramaturgy and Participation’. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17 (2): 180–199.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. 2017. ‘Developing Distributed Leadership: Leadership Emergence in a Sporting Context’. In Challenging Leadership Stereotypes through Discourse: Power, Management and Gender., ed. by Cornelia Ilie and Stephanie Schnurr, 147–70. Singapore: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. ‘Linguistic Ethnography’. In The Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace, ed. by Bernadette Vine, 40–50. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa, and Joan Manes. 1980. ‘The Compliment as a Social Strategy’. Paper in Linguistics 13 (3): 391–410.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Ponton, Douglas Mark, Vladimir I. Ozyumenko & Tatiana V. Larina
2025. Revisiting the rhetorical construction of political consent. Journal of Language and Politics 24:3 ► pp. 437 ff. DOI logo
Siriwittayakorn, Teeranoot & Seongha Rhee
2025. Functional extension of demonstratives: The case of person reference in Thai and Korean. Australian Journal of Linguistics 45:2 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Piippo, Irina
2021. Mirror-like address practice in Arabic-medium classroom interaction. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326], ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue