In:Engagement in Professional Genres:
Edited by Carmen Sancho Guinda
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 301] 2019
► pp. 243–258
Chapter 13
Scifotainment
Evolving multimodal engagement in online science news
Published online: 24 April 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.301.13zha
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.301.13zha
Abstract
This article adopts a multi-analytical perspective to examine engagement in an evolving science communication website. The website has evolved to engage readers from a “verbal nucleus” inherited from traditional news to a “hypermodal nucleus” that caters to the information consumption style of social media, and further to a “scifopost” that integrates social media post into the design. The evolution is driven by the shift from a “deficit model” to a “democracy model” in science communication and a larger cultural shift in the nature of knowledge creation and transmission. Furthermore, the more malleable multimodal resources as compared with verbal resources spearhead the shift from channels for science information to entertainment and engagement, which in turn triggers a similar shift of functions in verbal resources.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Engagement in online science news
- 3.Data: The evolving news page of Futurity
- 4.Theory and methods
- 5.Multimodal engagement in the evolving news pages
- 5.12009 version: Voice of authority as dominant engagement resource
- 5.22010 version: Media affordances as engagement device
- 5.32013 version: Social media practices as engagement scheme
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
Acknowledgements References
References (51)
Abdollahzadeh, Esmaeel. 2011. “Poring over the Findings: Interpersonal Authorial Engagement in Applied Linguistics Papers.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 288–297.
Allan, Stuart. 2009. “Making Science Newsworthy: Exploring the Conventions of Science Journalism.” In Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media, ed. by Richard Holliman, Elizabeth Whitelegg, Eileen Scanlon, Sam Smidt, and Jeff Thomas, 149–165. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Attar, Arif, and Audley Genus. 2014. “Framing Public Engagement: A Critical Discourse Analysis of GM Nation?” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 88: 241–250.
Berkenkotter, Carol, and Thomas N. Huckin. 1995. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communities: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brossard, Dominique. 2013. “New Media Landscapes and the Science Information Consumer.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (3): 14096–14101.
Brossard, Dominique, and Dietram A. Scheufele. 2013. “Science, New Media and the Public.” Science 339 (40): 40–41.
Caple, Helen. 2009. “Multi-Semiotic Communication in an Australian Broadsheet: A New News Story Genre.” In Genre in a Changing World, ed. by Charles Bazerman, Adair Bonini, and Débora Figueiredo, 243–254. Fort Collins: The WAC Clearinghouse.
Caple, Helen, and Monika Bednarek. 2010. “Double-Take: Unpacking the Play in the Image-Nuclear News Story.” Visual Communication 9 (2): 211–229.
Chen, Yumin. 2014. “Exploring the Attitudinal Variations in the Chinese English Language Press on the 2013 Air Pollution Incident.” Discourse & Communication 8 (4): 331–349.
de Semir, Vladimir. 2010. “Science Communication and Science Journalism.” Media for Science Forum. [URL] (Last accessed November 12, 2011)
Fairclough, Norman. 1993. “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities.” Discourse & Society 4 (2): 133–168.
Feng, Dezheng, and Peter Wignell. 2011. “Intertextual Voices and Engagement in TV Advertisements.” Visual Communication 10 (4): 565–588.
Gauntlett, David, ed. 2000. Web.studies: Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
Griffin, Michael. 2004. “Picturing America’s ‘War on Terrorism’ in Afghanistan and Iraq: Photographic Motifs as News Frames.” Journalism 5 (4): 381–402.
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
Hyland, Ken. 2005. “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192.
Ingmire, Jann. 2014. “Brain Waves Predict Which Kids Will Share.” Futurity, December 19. Accessed February 25, 2015. [URL].
Jarvie, I. C. 1990. “Media Representations and Philosophical Representations of Science.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7 (1):72–79.
Jones, Rodney. H. 2005. “Site of Engagement as Sites of Attention: Time, Space and Culture in Electronic Discourse.” In Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis, ed. by Sigrid Norris, and Rodney H. Jones. London, UK: Routledge.
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. London, UK: Routledge.
Kuester, Dan. 2011. “Super Food: Shoppers Will Pay 25% More.” Futurity, September 16. Accessed September 22, 2011. [URL].
Lane, Patric. 2009. “Jumbo Shellfish Rule in Acidic Oceans.” Futurity, December 1. Accessed April 28, 2010. [URL].
Lewenstein, Bruce V. 2001. “Science and the Media.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ed. by Neil J. Smelser, and Paul B. Baltes, 13654–13657. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Lorenzoni, Irene, Sophie Nicholson-Cole, and Lorraine Whitmarsh. 2007. “Barriers Perceived to Engaging with Climate Change among the UK Public and Their Policy Implications.” Global Environmental Change 17.
Martin, James R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Nelkin, Dorothy. 1995. Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Perrault, Sarah Tinker. 2013. Communicating Popular Science: From Deficit to Democracy. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ryan, Terry, Richard H. G. Field, and Lorne Olfman. 2003. “The Evolution of US State Government Home Pages from 1997 to 2002.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 (4): 403–430.
Sacharin, K. 2001. Attention! How to Interrupt, Yell, Whisper and Touch Consumers. New York, NY: Wiley.
Stilgoe, Jack, Simon J. Lock, and James Wilsdon. 2014. “Why Should We Promote Public Engagement with Science?” Public Understanding of Science 23 (4): 4–15.
Tan, Sabine. 2010. “Modeling Engagement in a Web-Based Advertising Campaign.” Visual Communication 9 (1): 91–115.
Trench, B. 2008. “Internet: Turning science communication inside-out?” In Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, ed. By M. Bucchi & B. Trench, 185–198. London & New York: Routledge.
van Leeuwen, Theo. 1993. “Genre and Field in Critical Discourse Analysis: A Synopsis.” Discourse & Society 4 (2): 193–223.
Varner, Johanna. 2014. “Scientific Outreach: Toward Effective Public Engagement with Biological Science.” BioScience 64 (4): 333–340.
Weinreich, Harald, Hartmut Obendorf, Eelco Herder, and Matthias Mayer. 2008. “Not Quite the Average: An Empirical Study of Web Use.” ACM Transactions on the Web 2 (1): 1–31.
White, Peter R. 1997. “Death, Disruption and the Moral Order: The Narrative Impulse in Mass ‘Hard News’ Reporting.” In Genres and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, ed. by Frances Christie and Jim R. Martin, 101–133. London, UK: Cassell.
2000. “Media Objectivity and the Rhetoric of News Story Structure”. In Discourse and community: Doing functional linguistics, ed. by Eija Ventola, 379–397. Tübingen: Gunter NarrVerlag.
Zhang, Yiqiong. 2012. Representing Science: A Multimodal Study of Science Popularization on Institutional and Mass Media Websites. PhD diss., National University of Singapore.
Zhang, Yiqiong, David Machin, and Tao Song. 2015. “Visual Forms of Address in Social Media Discourse: The Case of a Science Communication Website.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 10 (2): 236–252.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Nesi, Hilary
Pascual, Daniel, Ramón Plo-Alastrué & Isabel Corona
Sancho Guinda, Carmen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
