Cover not available

In:Engagement in Professional Genres:
Edited by Carmen Sancho Guinda
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 301] 2019
► pp. 1–26

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 1
Networking engagement in professional practices

Towards an integrative view

 | Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain
Published online: 24 April 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.301.01san
Abstract
In this chapter I revisit the concept of metadiscursive engagement, track its major courses of research up to date, and discuss the interpersonal and discursive assumptions it entails. In light of these assumptions, I draw connections among the different contributions to this volume, present a networked picture of engagement resulting from their different understandings, and finally pinpoint challenges and emerging issues. The global and open vision of engagement offered here not only intends to bring together the three major theoretical frameworks resorted to in this volume (i.e. the Appraisal System, the Hylandian Metadiscourse Model and Multimodality), but also to suggest relating them with the idea of ‘distance’ between sender and addressee, explored by both the Appraisal System itself and the pragmatic theories of Proximisation and Politeness.
Article outline
  • 1.Overview: Framing research on professional engagement
    • 1.1Meaning-making resources and theoretical eclecticism
  • 2.Issues arising: Research directions and challenges
    • 2.1Interpersonal assumptions
    • 2.2Discursive assumptions
  • 3.Broadening the notion: Engagement envisaged as (di)stance
  • 4.Closing reflections
  • Notes
  • References
References (96)
References
. 2010. “ Just to Give You Kind of a Map of Where We Are Going: A Taxonomy of Metadiscourse in Spoken and Written Academic English”. Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 69–97.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ädel, Annelie, and Anna Mauranen. 2010. “Metadiscourse: Diverse and Divided Perspective.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 1–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Artemeva, Natasha, and Aviva Freedman, eds. 2006. Rhetorical Genre Studies and Beyond. Winnipeg, MB, Canada: Inkshed Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aull, Laura L., Dineth Bandarage, and Meredith R. Miller 2017. “Generality in Student and Expert Epistemic Stance: A Corpus Analysis of First-Year, Upper Level, and Published Academic Writing.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 26: 29–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Translated by Caryl Emerson, and Michael Holquist. Ed. by Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamford, Julia, and Marina Bondi, eds. 2006. Managing Interaction in Professional Discourse: Intercultural and Interdiscoursal Perspectives. Rome: Officina Edizioni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. “Generic Integrity in Professional Discourse.” In Text and Talk in Professional Contexts, ed. by Britt-Louise Gunnarsson, Per Linell, and Bengt Nordberg, 61–76. Uppsala, Sweden: ASLA, Skriftserie 6.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. “Genre Mixing in Professional Communication: The case of ‘private intentions’ v. ‘socially recognised purposes’.” In Explorations in English for Professional Communication, ed. by Paul Bruthiaux, Tim Boswood, and Bertha Du-Babcock, 1–19. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. “Genre-mixing in Academic Introductions.” English for Specific Purposes 16 (3): 181–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Bethany Gray. 2016. Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth. 2012. Rethinking Academic Writinf Pedagogy for the European University. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2014. “Political Style.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, ed. by Peter Stockwell and Sara Whiteley, 536–557. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cockcroft, Robert, Susan Cockcroft, Craig Hamilton, and Laura Hidalgo Downing. 2014 [1995]. Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edmonds, Ernest, Lizzie Miller, and Matthew Connell. 2006. “On Creative Engagement.” Visual Communication 5 (3): 307–322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engberg, Jan. 2012. “Specialized Communication and Culture, Practice, Competence, and Knowledge: Implications and Derived Insights.” In Applied Linguistics Today: Research and Perspectives. Angewandte Linguistik heute: Forschung und Perspektiven, ed. by Leonard Pon, Vladimir Karabalic, and Sanja Cimer, 109–130. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1993. “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities. Discourse and Society 4 (2): 133–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gambetti, Rossella, and Guendalina Graffigna. 2010. “The Concept of Engagement: A Systematic Analysis of the Ongoing Marketing Debate.” International Journal of Market Research 52 (6): 801–826. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio. 2008. Investigating Specialized Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, Andrew. 2007. “Are Viewers ‘engaged’ with advertising? Does It Matter?” WARC Media FAQs, March 2007. [URL] Last accessed June 2015.
Gunnarsson, Britt-Louise. 2009. Professional Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, and van Langenhove, Luk. 1999. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hairston, Maxine, and Michael Keene. 2003 [1981]. Successful Writing. 5th edn. New York/London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heath, Robert. 2007. “How Do We Predict Advertising Attention and Engagement?” University of Bath School of Management Working Paper Series. Paper 09.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heylighen, Francis, and Jean-Marc Dewaele. 1999. Formality of Language: Definition, Measurement and Behavioral Determinants. Internal Report. Center “Leo Apostel” , Free University of Brussels. [URL]
Hinds, John 1987. “Reader versus Writer Responsibility: A New Typology.” In Writing across Languages: Analysis of L2 Text, ed. by Ulla Connor and Robert B. Kaplan, 141–152. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2001. “Bringing in the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Articles.” Written Communication 18: 549–574. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004a [2000]. Disciplinary Discourse: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004b. “Disciplinary Interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 Postgraduate Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 13: 133–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005a. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005b. “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7: 173–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008a. “Different Strokes for Different Folks: Disciplinary Variation in Academic Writing.” In Language and Discipline perspectives on Academic Discourse, ed. by Kjersti Fløttum, 89–108. Newcsatle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008b. “Constraint versus Creativity: Identity and Disciplinarity in Academic Writing.” In Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse, ed. by Maurizio Gotti, 25–52. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009a. Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. “Corpus Informed Discourse Analysis: The Case of Academic Engagement.” In Academic Writing. At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse, ed. by Maggie Charles, Diane Pecorari, and Susan Hunston, 110–128. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Constructing Proximity: Relating to Readers in Popular and Professional Science.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 116–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011a. “Projecting an Academic Identity in Some reflective Genres.” Ibérica 21 (Spring): 9–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. “Disciplines and Discourses: Social Interactions in the Construction of Knowledge. In Writing in the Knowledge Society, ed. by Doreen Starke-Meyerring, Anthony Paré, Natasha Artemeva, Miriam Horne, and Larissa Yousoubova, 193–214. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Undergraduate Understandings: Stance and Voice in Final Year Reports.” In Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, ed. by Ken Hyland and Carmen Sancho Guinda, 134–150. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Dialogue, Community and Persuasion in Research Writing.” In Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres, ed. by Luz Gil-Salom and Carmen Soler-Monreal, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Metadiscourse: What Is It and Where Is It Going?”. Journal of Pragmatics 113: 16–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. The Essential Hyland. Studies in Applied Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Polly Tse. 2004. “Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal.” Applied Linguistics 25 (2): 156–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Feng (Kevin) Jiang. 2016. “’We Must Conclude that’…: A Diachronic Study of Academic Engagement.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 24: 29–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Is Academic Writing Becoming More Informal?” English for Specific Purposes 40–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney. 2014. “Advertising Culture.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, ed. by Peter Stockwell and Sara Whiteley, 520–535. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kastberg, Peter. 2007. “Knowledge Communication: “The Emergence of a Third Order Discipline.” In Kommunikation in Bewegung: Multimedialer und Multilingualer Wissenstransfer in der Experten-Laien-Kommunikation, ed. by Claudia Villiger, and Heidrun Gerzymisch-Arbogast, 7–24. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge. An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006 [1996]. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lane, Janet, and Lange, Ellen 1999. Writing Clearly. An Editing Guide. 2nd edn. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenzoni, Irene, Sophie Nicholson-Cole, and Lorraine Whitmarsh. 2007. “Barriers Perceived to Engaging with Climate Change among the UK Public and Their Policy Implications.” Global Environmental Change 17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Machin, David. 2007. Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 1993. Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Discourse Reflexivity - A Discourse Universal? The Case of ELF” Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 13–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molino, Alessandra. 2010. “Personal and Impersonal Authorial References: A Contrastive Study of English and Italian in Linguistics Research Articles.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 86–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, Sigrid. 2004. Analyzing Multimodal Interaction. A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Toole, Michael. 1994. The Language of Displayed Art. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen. 2010. “The Discourse Functions of Metadiscourse in Published Academic Writing: Issues of Culture and Language.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 41–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Scientific Discourse and the Rhetoric of Globalization: The Impact of Culture and Language. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 2014. The Sense of Style. London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross-Larson, Bruce. 1999. Stunning Sentences. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sales, Hazel E. 2006. Professional Communication in Engineering. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sancho Guinda, Carmen. 2012a. “Flexibility Features in Patent Writing.” Ibérica 24: 185–210.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. “Proximal Positioning in Students’ Graph Commentaries.” In Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, ed. by Ken Hyland and Carmen Sancho Guinda, 166–183. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Engagement in NTSB Decisions on Aviation Case Appeals.” In Interpersonality in Legal Genres, ed. by Ruth Breeze, Maurizio Gotti, and Carmen Sancho Guinda, 181–211. Bern: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Genres on the Move: Currency and Erosion of the Genre Moves Construct.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 19: 73–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Semiotic Shortcuts: The Graphical Abstract Strategies of Engineering Students.” Hermes 55: 61–90. [URL]
. 2017. “Transmitting Authority in Risk Communication: An Exploration of US Air-Accident Dockets Online.” InPower, Persuasion and Manipulation in Specialised Genres, ed. by María Ángeles Orts, Ruth Breeze, and Maurizio Gotti, 211–336. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sancho Guinda, Carmen, and Ken Hyland. 2012. “Introduction: A Context-Sensitive Approach to Stance and Voice.” In Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, ed. by Ken Hyland and Carmen Sancho Guinda, 1–11. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul. 1993. Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strunk, William Jr., and E. B. White. 1972 [1959]. The Elements of Style. 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 2004. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John M., and Christine B. Feak 1994. Academic Writing for Graduate Students. A Course for Non-native Speakers of English. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sword, Helen. 2012. Stylish Academic Writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tichy, Henrietta J. (With Silvia Fourdrinier). 1988. Effective Writing for Engineers, Managers, Scientists. 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2014. “Affect and Emotion, Target-Value Mismatches and Russian Dolls.” In Evaluation in Context, ed. by Geoff Thompson and Laura Alba-Juez, 47–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trimble, John R. 2000 [1975]. Writing with Style. Conversations on the Art of Writing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turk, Christopher, and John Kirkman. 1996 [1982]. Effective Writing. Improving Scientific, Technical and Business Communication. London: E & FN Spon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vassileva, Irena. 2001. “Commitment and Detachment in English and Bulgarian Academic Writing.” English for Specific Purposes 20 (1): 83–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wallwork, Adrian. 2014a. Presentations, Demos, and Training Sessions. New York/Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014b. User Guides, Manuals and Technical Writing. New York/Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. English for Writing Research Papers. 2nd edn. New York/Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Alex. 2006. “Advertising Engagement: A Driver of Message Involvement in on Message Effects.” Journal of Advertising Research 46 (4): 355–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2014. “Interactions with Readers through Online Specialised Genres. Specificity or Adaptability?” In Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres, ed. by Luz Gil Salom and Carmen Soler-Monreal, 189–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zinsser, William. 2006 [1976]. On Writing Well. New York: Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwickle, Adam, and Robyn S. Wilson. 2014. “Construing Risk Implications for Risk Communication.” In Effective Risk Communication, ed. by Joseph Árvai and Louie Rivers, III, 190–203. New York/London: Routledge-Earthscan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Alwohaibi, Hala Abdulrahman & Hesham Suleiman Alyousef
2023. An Investigation of Engagement Resources in the World Cup 2022 Newspaper Articles in the Arab World Media. Journal of Contemporary Language Research 2:2 ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Sancho Guinda, Carmen
2023. ¿Idiolectos o tecnolectos? Resquicios de impronta personal en la descripción de procedimientos técnicos. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 93 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez-Jiménez, David & Paulina Meza
2022. Posicionamiento y dialogicidad en la escritura académica y profesional. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue