In:Technology Mediated Service Encounters
Edited by Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Lucía Fernández-Amaya and María de la O Hernández-López
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 300] 2019
► pp. 71–96
Chapter 3Managing verbal and embodied conduct in telephone-mediated service encounters
Published online: 10 January 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.300.03mat
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.300.03mat
Abstract
In telephone-mediated service encounters, there are limits on how parties interact with one another. Speakers are restricted to only verbal (what they say) and aural (what they hear) means of communication. Therefore, a practical problem at the heart of such interactions is how speakers manage embodied conduct, given that they can only hear – rather than see the other person. We investigated how verbal and embodied conduct were managed in a corpus of 63 calls to a New Zealand helpline service where callers (complainants) interact with conciliators (institutional representatives) to complain about, and attempt to resolve disputes with their electricity and gas providers. Using conversation analysis, we document two ways that callers could manage verbal and embodied conduct in a particular type of sequence in these calls.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Telephone-mediated service encounters
- 3.Managing engagement and actions in telephone-mediated interaction
- 4.Sequence organization, questioning and progressivity
- 5.Methodology
- 5.1Data
- 5.2Procedure
- 6.Analysis
- 6.1Managing verbal and embodied activity simultaneously
- 6.2Treating verbal and embodied activity as incompatible
- 7.Discussion and conclusions
Acknowledgements Notes References Appendix
References (45)
Baker, Carolyn, Michael Emmison, and Alan Firth. (eds). 2005. Calling for Help: Language and Social Interaction in Telephone Helplines. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Butler, Carly, Jonathan Potter, Susan Danby, Michael Emmison, and Alexa Hepburn. 2010. “Advice Implicative Interrogatives: Building ‘Client-centred Support’ in a Children’s Helpline.” Social Psychology Quarterly 73: 265–287.
DeLand, Michael. 2012. “Suspending Narrative Engagements: The Case of Pick-up Basketball.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 642: 96–108.
Dewar, Joe. 2011. “Calling to Complain: An Ethnographic and Conversation Analytic Account of Complaints to an Industry Ombudsman”. Unpublished master’s thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.
Edmonds, David Matthew. (2016). “Who Knows What and Who Has the Rights to Know It?: Knowledge and Reality Construction in Interaction.” Unpublished master’s thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.
Goodwin, Charles. 2007. “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse and Society 18: 53–73.
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 1992. “Context, Activity and Participation.” In The Contextualization of Language, ed. by Peter Auer, and Aldo di Luzio, 77–99. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Haddington, Pentti, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile. 2014. “Towards Multiactivity as a Social and Interactional Phenomenon.” In Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 3–32. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Hayano, Kaoru. 2014. “Question Design in Conversation”. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 395–414. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley – Blackwell.
Hepburn, Alexa, Sue Wilkinson, and Carly W. Butler. 2014. “Intervening With Conversation Analysis in Telephone Helpline Services: Strategies to Improves Effectiveness”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 47: 239–254.
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman. 2010. Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Chichester, U.K: Wiley-Blackwell.
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2012. “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter, 179–192. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, Robert. 1993. “Hold the phone.” In Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, ed. by Deidre Boden, and Don Zimmerman, 217–231. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity.
Jefferson, Gail. 1972. “Side Sequences.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 294–233. New York, NY: Free Press.
. 2004. “Glossary of Transcription Systems with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Katz, James, and Mark Aakhus. (eds). 2002. Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Kane, Michael, and Randall Engle. 2002. “The Role of Prefrontal Cortex in Working – memory Capacity, Executive Attention, and General Fluid Intelligence: An Individual – differences Perspective.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9: 637–671.
Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi. 2015. “Working the Overall Structural Organization of a Call: How Customers use Third-position as Leverage for Gaining Service Representatives’ Assistance in Dealing with Service Problems”. Language and Communication 43: 47–57.
Leung, Fung-Yee. 1997. “The Management of Intrusion in Telephone Calls: A Study of Call – waiting in Cantonese Telephone Conversations”. Unpublished master’s thesis, The University of Hong Kong.
Licoppe, Christian, and Sylvaine Tuncer. 2014. “Attending to a Summons and Putting Other Activities ‘On Hold’: Multiactivity as a Recognisable Interactional Accomplishment.” In Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 167–190. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Liddicoat, Anthony. 2009. “Sexual Identity as Linguistic Failure: Trajectories of Interaction in the Heteronormative Language Classroom.” Journal of Language, Identity and Education 8: 191–202.
Lindemann, Stephanie, and Anna Mauranen. 2001. “It’s Just Real Messy”: The Occurrence and Function of “Just” in a Corpus of Academic Speech.” English for Specific Purposes 20: 459–475.
Maynard, Douglas W., and Nora Cate Schaeffer. 1997. “Keeping the Gate: Declinations of the Request to Participate in a Telephone Survey Interview”. Sociological Methods and Research 26: 34–79.
Mazeland, Harrie. 2004. “Responding to the Double Implication of Telemarketers’ Opinion Queries.” Discourse Studies 6: 95–115.
Nevile, Maurice. 2015. “The Embodied Turn in Research on Language and Social Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48: 121–151.
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/no Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68: 939–967.
Redmayne, Mary. 2013. “New Zealand Adolescents’ Cellphone and Cordless Phone User – habits: Are they at Increased Risk of Brain Tumours Already? A Cross-sectional Study.” Environmental Health 12.
Relieu, Marc. 2010. “Mobile Phone “Work”: Disengaging and Engaging Mobile Phone Activities with Concurrent Activities.” In The Reconstruction of Space and Time: Mobile Communication Practices, ed. by Rich Ling, and Scott Campbell, 215–229. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Schegloff, Emanuel. 2002. “Beginnings in the Telephone.” In Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance, ed. by James Katz, and Mark Aakhus, 284–299. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Sidnell, Jack. 2014. “Basic Conversation Analytic Methods.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 77–99. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey Robinson. 2006. “A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in Society 35: 367–392.
Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2009. “For the Benefit of the Tape”: Formulating Embodied Conduct in Designedly Uni-modal Recorded Police-suspect Interrogations.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1887–1904.
Sutinen, Marika. 2014. “Negotiating Favourable Conditions for Resuming Suspended Activities.” In Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 137–166. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Szymanski, Margaret. 1999. “Re-engaging and Dis-engaging Talk in Activity.” Language in Society 28: 1–23.
Ticca, Anna-Claudia. 2014. “Managing Multiactivity in a Travel Agency: Making Phone Calls While Interacting with Customers.” In Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 191–226. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Watson, Jason, and David Strayer. 2010. “Supertaskers: Profiles in Extraordinary Multitasking Ability.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 17: 479–485.
Weatherall, Ann. 2015. “But Whose Side Are You On?”: Doing Being Independent in Telephone – mediated Dispute Resolution.” In Producing and Managing Restricted Activities: Avoidance and Withholding in Institutional Interaction, ed. by Fabienne Chevalier, and John Moore, 151–179. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
. 2016. “I Need to Get Some Details First”: Record Keeping as a Potential Barrier to Effective Complaint-call Management”. Mediation Theory and Practice 1: 35–58.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Weatherall, Ann & Fiona Grattan
Gasiorek, Jessica, Ann Weatherall & Bernadette Watson
Weatherall, Ann
2021. Chapter 1.3. Displaying emotional control by how crying and talking are managed. In How Emotions Are Made in Talk [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 321], ► pp. 77 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
