In:Politeness in Nineteenth-Century Europe
Edited by Annick Paternoster and Susan Fitzmaurice
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 299] 2019
► pp. 197–218
Chapter 6“With kindest regards”
Relational work, social identity and (hyper)politeness in Late Modern English documents
Published online: 10 January 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.299.07dos
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.299.07dos
Abstract
In Late Modern times, both usage guides and letter-writing manuals commented on language etiquette, providing guidance on how to address specific recipients according to their rank, age, and gender, how to approach certain topics, and how to convey mutual status relying exclusively on language. Guides and manuals, however, cannot always be assumed to be accurate representations of what actually occurred in usage. In this contribution I intend to investigate these materials alongside authentic ones, in order to assess the extent to which texts convey their writers’ awareness of asymmetrical social status by placing particular emphasis on politeness moves. Special attention is paid to business discourse, where identity construal issues are crucial for the maintenance of successful networks.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Providing guidance: Politeness in model texts
- 3.Social status awareness and the politeness cline
- 3.1Negotiating status in business
- 3.2Negotiating status beyond business
- 4.Concluding remarks
Notes Primary sources References
References (39)
19CSC, Corpus of Nineteenth-Century Scottish Correspondence. in preparation. Marina Dossena, and Richard Dury (compilers). University of Bergamo, Italy.
Anon. 1905. La più grande e completa grammatica italiana – inglese […]. Manuale di conversazione […] Dizionario […] Segretario con 120 lettere italiane ed inglese [sic]. Lettere per l’operaio, lettere commerciali, lettere amorose. Carta per la cittadinanza. N.p.
Corpus of Modern Scottish Writing. [URL] (accessed September 2018).
Nietz Collection of Nineteenth-century Schoolbooks. [URL] (accessed September 2018).
Bax, Marcel, and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.). 2011. Understanding Historical (Im)Politeness. Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12/1-2.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Jane Demmen. 2011. “Nineteenth-Century English Politeness: Negative Politeness, Conventional Indirect Requests and the Rise of the Individual Self.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1–2): 49–81.
Dierks, Konstantin 2000. “The Familiar Letter and Social Refinement in America, 1750–1800”. In Letter Writing as a Social Practice, ed. by David Barton, and Nigel Hall, 31–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dossena, Marina. 2006. “Forms of Self-representation in Nineteenth-Century Business Letters”. In Diachronic Perspectives on Domain-Specific English, ed. by Marina Dossena, and Irma Taavitsainen, 173–190. Bern: Peter Lang.
. 2008a. “‘We beg leave to refer to your decision’: Pragmatic Traits of Nineteenth-Century Business Correspondence”. In Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence: Methodology and Data, ed. by Marina Dossena, and Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, 235–255.
. 2008b. “Prescriptivism a Century Ago: Business Correspondence Taught to Emigrants – A Case Study”. In Perspectives on Prescriptivism, ed. by Joan C. Beal, Carmela Nocera, and Massimo Sturiale, 41–58. Bern: Peter Lang.
. 2010a. “‘Be pleased to report expressly’: The Development of Public Style English in Nineteenth-Century Business and Official Correspondence”. In Eighteenth-Century English. Ideology and Change, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 293–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2010b. “Building Trust through (Self-)Appraisal in Nineteenth-Century Business Correspondence”. In Social Roles and Language Practices in Late Modern English, ed. by Päivi Pahta, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi, and Minna Palander-Collin, 191–209. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2011. “Handwritten Communication in Nineteenth-Century Business Correspondence”. In Communicating Early English Manuscripts, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Päivi Pahta, 133–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2012. “The Study of Correspondence: Theoretical and Methodological Issues”. In Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe, ed. by Marina Dossena, and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti, 13–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2014. “‘There is reason to believe however…’: The Construction of Trust as Reliability in Late Modern English Correspondence and Non-Literary Prose”. In Trust and Discourse, Organizational Perspectives, ed. by Katja Pelsmaekers, Geert Jacobs, and Craig Rollo, 181–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dossena, Marina, and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.). 2012. Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dossena, Marina, and Susan M. Fitzmaurice (eds.). 2006. Business and Official Correspondence: Historical Investigations. Bern: Peter Lang.
Dury, Richard. 2006. “A Corpus of Nineteenth-Century Business Correspondence: Methodology of Transcription”. In Business and Official Correspondence: Historical Investigations, ed. by Marina Dossena, and Susan M. Fitzmaurice, 193–205. Bern: Peter Lang.
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2010. “Changes in the Meanings of Politeness in Eighteenth-Century England: Discourse Analysis and Historical Evidence”. In Historical (Im)politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 87–115. Bern: Peter Lang.
Fukushima, Saeko. 2015. “In Search of Another Understanding of Politeness: From the Perspective of Attentiveness”. Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 261–287.
Grice, Paul H. 1975 [1989]. “Logic and Conversation”. In Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Studies in the Way of Words, ed. by Paul H. Grice, 22–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jucker, Andreas H., Daniela Landert, Annina Seiler, and Nicole Studer-Joho (eds.). 2013. Meaning in the History of English: Words and Texts in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jucker, Andreas H., and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.). 2004. Letter Writing. Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics.
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Annick Paternoster. 2015. “Historicity in Metapragmatics. A Study on ‘Discernment’ in Italian Metadiscourse”. Pragmatics 25 (3): 369–391.
Kohnen, Thomas. 2007. “Text Types and the Methodology of Diachronic Speech Act Analysis”. In Historical Pragmatics: What It Is and How to Do It, ed. by Susan M. Fitzmaurice, and Irma Taavitsainen, 139–166. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts. 2005. “Politeness Theory and Relational Work”. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 9–33.
Mitchell, Linda C. 2012. “Teaching Grammar and Composition through Letter Writing in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century England”. In Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe, ed. by Marina Dossena, and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti, 229–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2016a. “Introduction”. In Forms of Address: Five Hundred Years of Letters, ed. by Linda C. Mitchell. Special issue of Huntington Library Quarterly 79 (3): 343–344.
2016b. “Entertainment and Instruction: Women’s Roles in the English Epistolary Tradition”. In Forms of Address: Five Hundred Years of Letters, ed. by Linda C. Mitchell. Special issue of Huntington Library Quarterly 79 (3): 439–454.
Mugglestone, Lynda 2006. “English in the Nineteenth Century”. In The Oxford History of English, ed. by Lynda Mugglestone, 274–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Palander-Collin, Minna, and Minna Nevala (eds.). 2005. Letters and Letter Writing. Special issue of European Journal of English Studies.
Paternoster, Annick, and Francesca Saltamacchia. 2017. “(Im)politeness Formulae and (Im)politeness Rules: Metadiscourse and Conventionalisation in 19th Century Italian Conduct Books”. In Studies on Language Norms in Context, ed. by Elena Maria Pandolfi, Johanna Miecznikowski, Sabine Christopher, and Alain Kamber, 263–301. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.
Poster, Carol, and Linda C. Mitchell (eds.). 2007. Letter-Writing Manuals and Instruction from Antiquity to the Present: Historical and Bibliographic Studies. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Schultz, Lucille M. 2000. “Letter-Writing Instruction in Nineteenth-Century Schools in the United States”. In Letter Writing as a Social Practice, ed. by David Barton, and Nigel Hall, 109–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Shvanyukova, Polina. 2014. “‘A cargo of coffee, sugar, and indigo’: Transatlantic Business Correspondence in Nineteenth-Century Business Letter-Writing Manuals”. Token: A Journal of English Linguistics 3: 73–90.
Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa. 2003. “‘Best patterns for your imitation’: Early Modern Letter-Writing Instruction and Real Correspondence”. In Discourse Perspectives on English. Medieval to Modern, ed. by Risto Hiltunen, and Janne Skaffari, 167–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.