In:Politeness in Nineteenth-Century Europe
Edited by Annick Paternoster and Susan Fitzmaurice
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 299] 2019
► pp. 75–106
Chapter 2The Nuovo Galateo (‘New Galateo’, 1802) by Melchiorre Gioja, politeness (pulitezza) and reason
Published online: 10 January 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.299.03sal
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.299.03sal
Abstract
In 1802 Melchiorre Gioja published the Nuovo Galateo (‘New Galateo’), a treatise that supplants the aristocratic model based on conventional ceremonies with a model based on ragione sociale ‘social reason’. The word and its morphological derived lexemes play an important role in the argumentative architecture of the treatise. We hypothesize that reason can be considered an argumentative keyword of the treatise, i.e. a word that evokes beliefs and values that function as endoxa. We examine the collocations and the constructions in which ragione and its derived lexemes enter, and we demonstrate how different key-constructions based on ragione are used to argumentatively justify politeness evaluations. This investigation not only confirms the argumentative keyness of the reason-related constructions, but also casts light on the utilitarian nature of the social reason underlying Gioja’s view of politeness.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Key words as culturally shared evaluations
- 3.The New Galateo
- 4.The occurrences of “reason”: Frequency and polysemy
- 5.Social reason
- 6.In ragione di ‘by reason of’: Economic and mathematical origins
- 7.Per/con ugual ragione ‘for/with the same reason’ and con maggior ragione ‘with more reason’ as argumentative indicators
- 8.Conclusion
Notes Primary sources References
References (61)
. 1820. Nuovo galateo di Melchiorre Gioja, autore del Trattato Del merito e delle ricompense, 2 volumes. Milan: Pirotta.
. 1832 [1827]. Nuovo galateo di M.G. Edizione diligentemente eseguita sull’ultima dell’autore, 2 volumes. Lugano: Ruggia, Firenze: Ricordi.
Albertoni, Ettore A. 1990. “Aspetti del pensiero politico di Melchiorre Gioja”. In Melchiorre Gioja 1767–1829. Politica, società, economia tra riforme e Restaurazione, Atti del convegno di studi, Piacenza, 5–7 aprile 1990, ed. by Carlo Capra, 27–48. Piacenza: Tip. Le. Co.
Battaglia, Salvatore, Edoardo Sanguineti, and Giovanni Ronco. 1961. Grande dizionario della lingua italiana. Turin: Utet.
Bax, Marcel. 2011. “An Evolutionary Take on (Im)Politeness. Three Broad Developments in the Marking out of Socio-proxemic Space”. In Understanding Historical (Im)politeness, ed. by Marcel Bax and Dániel Z. Kádár, 255–282. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12: 1–2.
Bax, Marcel, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2011. “The Historical Understandings of Historical (Im)Politeness: Introductory Notes”. In Understanding Historical (Im)Politeness, ed. by Marcel Bax, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 1–24. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12: 1–2.
Botteri, Inge. 1990. “Dalla «grazia» alla «ragion sociale»: il «Nuovo galateo» di Melchiorre Gioja”. In Melchiorre Gioja 1767–1829. Politica, società, economia tra riforme e Restaurazione. Atti del convegno di studi, Piacenza, 5–7 aprile 1990, ed. by Carlo Capra, 157–201. Piacenza: Tip. Le. Co.
. 1999. Galateo e galatei. La creanza e l’istituzione della società nella trattatistica tra antico regime e stato liberale. Rome: Bulzoni.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1978. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Condorcet, Nicolas J. A. 1969 [1794]. Abbozzo di un quadro storico dei progressi dello spirito umano. Turin: Einaudi.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Robert Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Peter Houtlosser, and Francisca A. Snoeck Henkemans. 2007. Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study. Amsterdam: Springer.
Freeman, James B. 2005. Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ghiringhelli, Robertino. 1990. “La formazione di Melchiorre Gioja nella Piacenza di fine Settecento: gli anni al Colleggio Alberoni (1784–1793)”. In Melchiorre Gioja 1767–1829. Politica, società, economia tra riforme e Restaurazione. Atti del convegno di studi, Piacenza, 5–7 aprile 1990, ed. by Carlo Capra, 63–80. Piacenza: Tip. Le. Co.
Gipper, Andreas. 2011. “Dal giovin signore al Cittadino Borghese. Melchiorre Gioja, il Nuovo Galateo e la filosofia francese”. In Vie Lombarde e Venete. Circolazione e trasformazione dei saperi letterari nel Sette-Ottocento fra l’Italia settentrionale e l’Europa transalpina, ed. by Helmut Meter, and Furio Brugnolo, 27–40. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Hübler, Alex, and Ulrich Busse. 2012. “Introduction.” In Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English. A Contribution to Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Ulrich Busse and Axel Hübler, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jucker, Andreas H. 2011. “Positive and Negative Face as Descriptive Categories in the History of English”. In Understanding Historical (Im)Politeness, ed. by Marcel Bax and Dániel Z. Kádár, 178–197. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12: 1–2.
Kay, Paul. 2004. “Pragmatic Aspects of Grammatical Constructions”. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 675–700. Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.
Meriggi, Marco. 2002. Gli stati italiani prima dell’Unità. Una storia istituzionale. Bologna: Il Mulino.
O’Driscoll, Jim. 2010. “Epilogue”. In Historical (Im)Politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 265–287. Bern: Peter Lang.
Ossola, Carlo. 2012. “Civilizzazione e ragione sociale”. In Letteratura italiana e canone dei classici (L’età romantica), ed. by Carlo Ossola, and Giacomo Jori, 3–5. Turin: Utet.
Paternoster, Annick, and Francesca Saltamacchia. 2017. “(Im)Politeness Rules and (Im)Politeness Formulae: Metadiscourse and Conventionalisation in 19th Century Italian Conduct Books.” In Studies on Language Norms in Context, ed. by Elena Maria Pandolfi, Johanna Miecznikowski, Sabine Christopher, and Alain Kambers, 263–301. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Pollaroli, Chiara, and Andrea Rocci. 2015. “The Argumentative Relevance of Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor in Advertising”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 4 (2): 158–199.
Raschini, Maria Adelaide. 1968. “L’illuminismo italiano (Muratori, Soave, Gioja, Pietro e Alessandro Verri, Filangieri, Pagano)”. In Grande Antologia Filosofica, ed. by Umberto Padovani, Michele F. Sciacca, and Andrea M. Moschetti, 929–1197. Milan: Marzorati.
Riall, Lucy. 2009. Risorgimento. The history of Italy from Napoleon to Nation-state, New York, Palgrave: Macmillan.
Rigotti, Eddo. 1993. “La Sequenza Testuale. Definizione e procedimenti di analisi con esemplificazioni in lingue diverse”. L’analisi Linguistica e Letteraria 1 (1): 43–148.
. 2009. “Whether and How Classical Topics Can Be Revived in the Contemporary Theory of Argumentation”. In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation, ed. by Frans van Eemeren, and Bart Garssen, 157–178. New York: Springer.
Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco Morasso. 2009. “Argumentation as an Object of Interest and as a Social and Cultural Resource”. In Argumentation and Education, ed. by Nathalie Muller-Mirza, and Anne Nelly Perret-Clermont, 9–66. New York: Springer.
. 2010. “Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components”. Argumentation 24 (4): 489–512.
Rigotti, Eddo, and Andrea Rocci. 2001. “Sens – non-sens – contresens”. Studies in Communication Sciences 2: 45–80.
. 2004. “From Argument Analysis to Cultural Keywords (and Back Again)”. In The Practice of Argumentation, ed. by Frans van Eemeren, and Peter Houtlosser, 903–908. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rigotti, Eddo, Andrea Rocci, and Sara Greco. 2006. “The semantics of Reasonableness”. In Considering Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Peter Houtlosser, and Agnes van Rees, 257–274. Mahwah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rocci, Andrea. 2006. “Pragmatic Inference and Argumentation in Intercultural Communication”. Intercultural Pragmatics 3 (4): 409–442.
. 2017. Modality in Argumentation. A systematic Investigation of the Role of Modalities in the Structure of Arguments with an Application to Italian Modal Expressions. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rocci, Andrea, and Marcel Danesi. 2009. Global Linguistics: An Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Rocci, Andrea, and Wariss M. Monteiro. 2009. “Cultural Keywords in Arguments. The Case of Interactivity”. Cogency 1 (2): 65–100.
Romagnosi, Gian Domenico. 1835 [1832]. Dell’indole e dei fattori dell’incivilimento. Prato: Stamperia Giusti.
Sofia, Francesca. 1990. “Melchiorre Gioja e la statistica”. In Melchiorre Gioja 1767–1829. Politica, società, economia tra riforme e Restaurazione. Atti del convegno di studi, Piacenza, 5–7 aprile 1990, ed. by Carlo Capra, 249–268. Piacenza: Tip. Le. Co.
Stubbs, Michael. 1996. Text and Corpus Analysis. Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. London: Blackwell.
Tasca, Luisa. 2004. Galatei. Buone maniere e cultura borghese nell’Italia dell’Ottocento. Florence: Le Lettere.
Tommaseo, Niccolò, and Bernardo Bellini. 1861–1879. Dizionario della lingua italiana. Turin: Unione Tipografico-Editrice. Retrieved from [URL]
Vanni, Laura. 2006. Verso un nuovo galateo. Le buone maniere in Italia tra ‘antico’ e ‘nuovo’ regime. Milan: Unicopli.
Vocabolario degli Accademici della Crusca, quinta impressione. 1863–1923. Florence: Nelle stanze dell’Accademia. Retrieved from [URL]
. 2005. “Linguistic Politeness Research: Quo Vadis?”. In Politeness in Language, ed. by Richard Watts, Ide Sashiko, and Konrad Ehlich, i–xlvii. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
