In:Conversation Analysis and Language Alternation: Capturing transitions in the classroom
Edited by Anna Filipi and Numa Markee
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 295] 2018
► pp. 107–128
Chapter 6L1/L2 alternation practices in students’ task planning
Published online: 1 November 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.295.06kun
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.295.06kun
Abstract
This conversation analytic study explores the language alternation patterns enacted by students of Italian as a Foreign Language as they engage in planning a classroom presentation. The data consist of 13 planning sessions conducted by two groups of students enrolled in a third semester course and two groups of students enrolled in a sixth semester course at a US university. The analysis shows how the participants achieve a local interactional order (Cromdal 2005) where the alternation between the L1 and the L2 embodies the distinction between planning process (in L1-English) and planning product (in L2-Italian) and achieves the transition between such components of the planning activity. Overall, the study demonstrates that language alternation is a discursive skill that constitutes a resource for planning for students at different proficiency levels.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Literature review
- The interactional/CA perspective
- Language of the process versus language of the product
- Participants, task and setting
- Analysis
- L1 for the process, L2 for the product
- English as a temporary language of the product
- Formulating script lines in the L1
- L1 use in the face of trouble in the L2
- L1 use in focus position
- L1 use to verify the accuracy of L2 formulations
- Italian as a temporary language of the process
- Discussion
Notes
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Ro, Eunseok
Filipi, Anna & Mu-Sen Kevin Chuang
Filipi, Anna
Filipi, Anna
2023. Nobody said it was going to be easy! (Practical) considerations in assessing interactional competence in the classroom. Applied Pragmatics 5:2 ► pp. 273 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
