In:Legal Pragmatics
Edited by Dennis Kurzon and Barbara Kryk-Kastovsky
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 288] 2018
► pp. 21–40
Chapter 1Pleading for life
Narrative patterns within legal petitions (Salem, 1692)
Published online: 26 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.288.01dot
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.288.01dot
Abstract
While the past decade has seen much scholarship on the legal language of the Salem witchcraft trials in 1692, few studies have been completed on the narrative features of petitions. This study focuses not solely on the formulaic or structural aspects of petitions but introduces and explores various social narratives within them. These social narratives emphasize the petitioner’s family life, religious beliefs and activities, and status in the community. The data consist of 21 petitions presented in 1692 during the height of the crisis (March to December), including both petitions written by individuals accused of witchcraft and those written by other individuals. The three main components – religious, familial, community – of social narratives are analyzed. The study concludes that the intersection between formulaic petitionary language and social narratives that evoke both family and religion dominate in the petitions of 1692. Petitions are used to reframe the accused as participants in a larger social narrative rather than as witches or wizards.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2. The data
- 3.Language and the legal context
- 4.Features of social narratives
- 4.1Voices of belief
- 4.2Community voices
- 4.3Family voices
- 5.Petitionary letters in twenty-first century America
- 6.Concluding comments
- Key to orthography of seventeenth-century English
Notes References
References (25)
Albanese, Catherine L. 1981. America: Religions and Religion. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing.
Archer, Dawn. 2002. “‘Can Innocent People be Guilty?’ A Sociopragmatic Analysis of Examination Transcripts from the Salem Witchcraft Trials”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 3: 1–30.
Bamberg, Michael and Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2008. “Small Stories as a New Perspective in Narrative and Identity Analysis.” Text and Talk, 28–3 (377–396).
Bellah, Robert N. 1975. The Broken Covenant: American Civil Religion in Time of Trial. New York: Seabury Press.
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London and New York: Longman.
Briggs, Robin. 1996. Witches and Neighbors: The Social and Cultural Context of European Witchcraft. New York: The Penguin Group.
Clark, Stuart. 1997. Thinking with Demons: The Idea of Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
, ed. 2001. Languages of Witchcraft: Narrative, Ideology and Meaning in Early Modern Culture. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Connor, David P. 2016. “How to Get out of Prison: Views from Parole Board Members.” Corrections Policy, Practice and Research (March).
Demos, John. 2008. The Enemy Within: 2000 Years of Witch-hunting in the Western World. New York, NY: The Penguin Group.
den Boer, Monica. 1993. “Do Trials have Real Winners? On the Harmonisation of Interpretations and the Constructions of Pseudo-Consensus in Legal Discourse.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, VI, 18:293–304.
Dodd, Gwilym. 2007. Justice and Grace: Private Petitioning and the English Parliament in the Late Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Doty, Kathleen L. 2007. “Telling Tales: The Role of Scribes in Constructing the Discourse of the Salem Witchcraft Trials.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8: 25–41.
Doty, Kathleen L. and Hiltunen, Risto. 2009. “Formulaic Discourse and Speech Acts in the Witchcraft Trial Records of Salem, 1692,” Journal of Pragmatics 41, 458–469.
Doty, Kathleen and Risto Hiltunen. 2002. ‘I will tell, I will tell’: Confessional Patterns in the Salem Witchcraft Trials, 1692. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 3 (2), 299–335.
Grund, Peter. 2007. “From Tongue to Text: The Transmission of the Salem Witchcraft Records.” American Speech 82: 119–150.
Held, Gudrun. 2010. “’Supplica la mia parvidade’: Petitions in Medieval Society – A Matter of Ritualized or First Reflexive Politeness?” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 11: 194–218.
Hiltunen, Risto and Matti Peikola. 2007. “Trial Discourse and Manuscript Context: Scribal Profiles in the Salem Witchcraft Records.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8: 43–68.
Kohnen, Thomas. 2001. “On Defining Text Types within Historical Linguistics: The Case of Petitions/Statutes.” European Journal of English Studies, 5(2): 197–203.
Labov, William and Joshua Waletsky. 1967. “Narrative Analysis”. In: Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, J. Helms, ed. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 12–44.
Labov, William. 1997. “Some Further Steps in Narrative Analysis.” Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4): 395–415.
Norton, Mary Beth. 2002. In the Devil’s Snare: The Salem Witchcraft Crisis of 1692. New York: Vintage Books.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.