In:Pragmatics of Japanese: Perspectives on grammar, interaction and culture
Edited by Mutsuko Endo Hudson, Yoshiko Matsumoto and Junko Mori
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 285] 2018
► pp. 125–148
Chapter 5Superiors’ directives in the Japanese workplace
Are they all strategic?
Published online: 16 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.285.05coo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.285.05coo
Abstract
One of the criticisms against Brown and Levinson’s universal theory of politeness (1987) is the assertion that discernment politeness is more important than volitional politeness in Japanese society (e.g., Ide 1989; Hill et al. 1986). Contrary to this claim, studies that have analyzed actual discourse in the Japanese workplace report abundant volitional politeness strategies. These opposing views raise a question as to where and to what extent Japanese speakers use volitional strategies or observe discernment in the workplace. To answer this question, this chapter investigates superiors’ directives in new employee orientation sessions in a Japanese company. It finds a tendency among superiors to observe discernment when issuing procedural directives and to use negative and positive politeness strategies when issuing non-procedural directives.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Types of directives: Procedural and non-procedural directives
- 3. Studies on directives in the Japanese workplace
- 4.Data and methodology
- 5.Superiors’ directives in the orientation sessions
- 5.1Procedural directives
- 5.2Non-procedural directives
- 5.3Non-exclusivity between type of directive and linguistic forms
- 6.Discussion and conclusion
Appendix Acknowledgement Notes References
References (31)
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Byron, Andrew S. 2006. “The Role of Indirectness and Honorifics in Achieving Linguistic Politeness in Korean Requests.” Journal of Politeness Research 2: 247–276.
Cook, Haruko M. 2008. “Organization of Turns, Speech Styles and Postures in a Japanese Elementary School.” In Japanese Applied Linguistics: Discourse and Social Perspectives, ed. by Junko Mori, and Amy Ohta, 80–108. London: Continuum.
Dunn, Cynthia D. 2011. “Formal Forms or Verbal Strategy? Politeness Theory and Japanese Business Etiquette Training.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3643–3654.
Ervin-Tripp, Susan. 1976. “Is Sybil There?: The Structure of Some American English Directives.” Language in Society 5: 25–66.
Furo, Hiroko. 1996. “Linguistic Conflict of Japanese Women: Is That a Request or an Order?” In Proceedings of Fourth Berkeley Women and Language Conference, ed. by Natasha Warner, Jocelyn Ahlers, Leela Blimes, Monica Oliver, Suzanne Wertheim, and Melinda Chen, 247–259. University of California, Berkeley.
Geyer, Naomi. 2013. “Discernment and Variation: The Action-oriented Use of Japanese Addressee Honorifics.” Multilingua 32(2): 155–176.
Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1980. “Directive-response Speech Sequences in Girls’ and Boys’ Task Activities.” In Women and Language in Literature and Society, ed. by Salley McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker, and Nelly Furman, 153–173. New York: Prager.
Hill, Beverly, Sachiko Ide, Shoko Ikuta, Akiko Kawasaki, and Tsunao Ogino. 1986. “Universals in Linguistic Politeness: Quantitative Evidence from Japanese and American English.” Journal of Pragmatics 10: 347–371.
Ide, Sachiko. 1989. “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness.” Multilingua 8: 223–248.
Jones, Kimberly. 1992. “A Question of Context: Directive Use at a Morris Team Meeting.” Language in Society 21: 427–445.
Kádár, Dániel and Mills, Sara. 2013. “Rethinking Discernment.” Journal of Politeness Research 9(2): 133–158.
Mao, LuMing R. 1994. “Beyond Politeness Theory: ‘Face’ Revisited and Renewed.” Journal of Pragmatics 21: 451–486.
Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1988. “Reexamination of the Universality of Face: Politeness Phenomena in Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 12: 403–26.
Maynard, Senko. 1993. Discourse Modality: Subjectivity, Emotion and Voice in the Japanese Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Mulholland, Joan. 1994. “Multiple Directives in the Doctor-patient Consultation.” Australian Journal of Communication 21: 74–85.
Okamoto, Shigeko. 2010. “Politeness in East Asia.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics (Handbooks of Pragmatics, Vol. 6), ed. by Miriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham, 71–100. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Saito, Junko. 2011. “Managing Confrontational Situations: Japanese Male Superiors’ Interactional Styles in Directive Discourse in the Workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1689–1706.
Silverstein, Michael. 2001. “The Limits of Awareness.” In Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 328–40. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Smith, Janet S. 1992. “Women in Charge: Politeness and Directives in the Speech of Japanese Women.” Language in Society 21(1): 59–82.
Sunaoshi, Yukako. 1994. “Mild Directives Work Effectively: Japanese Women in Command.” In Cultural Performance: Proceedings of Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference, ed. by Mary Bucholtz, A. Caitlin Hines, Anita C. Liang, and Laurel A. Sutton C, 678–690. University of California, Berkeley.
Takano, Shoji. 2005. “Re-examining Linguistic Power: Strategic Uses of Directives by Professional Japanese Women in Positions of Authority and Leadership.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 633–666.
Trosborg, Anna. 1994. Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies, Vol. 7. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Vine, Bernadette. 2004. Getting Things Done at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
