In:Language and Violence: Pragmatic perspectives
Edited by Daniel N. Silva
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 279] 2017
► pp. 107–124
Chapter 4The circulation of violence in discourse
Published online: 9 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.279.05sil
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.279.05sil
Abstract
This paper examines two hypotheses concerning the relationship between language and violence. (1) Language does not merely represent violence, but enacts its own type of violence. (2) The use of violent language participates in the demarcation of political and subjective viability in the public sphere. I argue that these hypotheses are true to the extent that discourse circulates. I elaborate on two models of discourse circulation: iterability, a concept that Jacques Derrida proposed and that Judith Butler borrows in her understanding of the performativity of hate speech, and communicability, an anthropological concept devised by Charles Briggs to envision the complex infectious character of modern discourses. This paper also looks at the communicability of violent discourse in Brazilian contemporary political life.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Violent language and iterability
- 3.Violent language and communicability
- 4.Using language to wound
- 5.Final remarks
Notes References
References (31)
Althusser, Louis. 1971. Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, 127–86. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Bauman, Richard, and Charles Briggs. 2003. Voices of Modernity. Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
Briggs, Charles. 2005. “Communicability, Racial Discourse, and Disease.” Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 269–291.
. 2007a. “Anthropology, Interviewing, and Communicability in Contemporary Social Life.” Current Anthropology 48 (4): 551–580.
. 2007b. “Mediating infanticide: Theorizing relations between narrative and violence.” Cultural Anthropology 22 (3): 315–356.
. 2011. “On Virtual Epidemics and the Mediatization of Public Health.” Language and Communication 31:217–228.
Caldeira, Teresa. 2000. City of Walls. Crime, segregation and citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Felman, Shoshana. 1980. Le Scandale du corps parlant. Don Juan avec Austin ou la seduction en deux langues [The Scandal of the Speaking Body. Don Juan and Austin, or Seduction in Two Languages]. Paris: Seuil.
Frege, Gottlob. 1952. “On Sense and Reference.” In Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, ed. by Peter Geach and Max Black, 56–78. London: Blackwell.
Gamboggi, Ana Laura. 2010. Lo que no se puede llevar en la maleta: Mudanza, memoria y museo en el nordeste brasileño [What Could Not Be Taken in the Suitcase: Change, Memory, and Museum in the Brazilian Northeast]. México, DF: Universidad Antónoma Metropolitana.
Malkki, Liisa. 1995. Purity and Exile: Violence, Memory, and National Cosmology Among Hutu Refugees in Tanzania. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil. 2000. “On Searle (on Austin) on Language.” Language and Communication 20: 347–391.
Saussure, Ferdinand. 1983 [1916]. Course in General Linguistics. Transl. Roy Harris. Chicago: Open Court.
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Silva, Daniel. 2012. Pragmática da violência: O Nordeste na mídia brasileira [Pragmatics of Violence: The Northeast of Brazil in the Media]. Rio de Janeiro: 7 Letras/Faperj.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Silva, Daniel N.
Mestre-Mestre, Eva M.
Silva, Daniel do Nascimento e
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
