In:Cultural Keywords in Discourse
Edited by Carsten Levisen and Sophia Waters
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 277] 2017
► pp. 235–242
Chapter 10An invitation to keyword studies
Guidance for future research
Published online: 19 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.277.10lev
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.277.10lev
Article outline
- 1.Future studies in cultural keywords
- 2.Locating the candidates for keyness
- 3.Using NSM: Semantic explications or cultural scripts?
- 4.The keyword canons revisited
- Keywords came from discourse
- Keywords reflect cultural values
- Keywords create discursive contexts
- Keywords maintain discursive fixities
- Keywords reveal the scripted lives of people
- Keywords are constitutive of a deep emic logic
- 5.The thick darkness of language
References
References (3)
Antaki, Charles, Michael Billig, Derek Edwards, and Jonathan Potter. 2003. “Discourse Analysis Means Doing Analysis: A Critique of Six Analytical Shortcomings. Discourse Analysis Online 1 (1): 1–24.
Bondi, Marina, and Mike Scott. eds. 2010. Keyness in Texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Levisen, Carsten, and Sophia Waters. 2015. “Lige – a Danish ‘Magic Word’? An Ethnopragmatic Analysis. International Journal of Language and Culture 2 (2): 244–268.