Cover not available

In:Implicitness: From lexis to discourse
Edited by Piotr Cap and Marta Dynel
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 276] 2017
► pp. 177–200

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 8
Indirect ritual offence

A study on elusive impoliteness

 | University of Huddersfield
Published online: 30 June 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276.08kad
The present chapter examines the phenomenon of indirect ritual offence, which includes cases of recurrent offences that are indirect and as such make it difficult for the targeted person to respond to them. Manifestations of indirect ritual offence include a series of indirect attacks that recurrently target a person, and cases in which the targeted person is recurrently ostracised. While this behaviour has received significant attention is social psychology, it has not been studied in pragmatics and (im)politeness research, in spite of the fact that it is one of the most widely discussed forms of impoliteness behaviour in public discourses. The examination of this phenomenon also contributes to the pragmatic examination of the difference between indirectness and implicitness; as I point out in this chapter, indirect ritual offence becomes implicit from both academic and lay points of view if the frequency of such attacks decreases but the attacks nevertheless continue. In such cases, the targeted person may reinterpret previous attacks as “harmless” and speculate about the nature of new attacks, and even more importantly the abuser can easily claim that they have not intended to offend the other at all – thus, in such cases indirect ritual offence gains an implicit nature. In order to illustrate this point, I examine ways in which “implicit” as an evaluator tends to be metapragmatically used in accounts on indirect ritual offence.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Indirect ritual offence
    • 2.1Contribution to research on implicitness
    • 2.2An understudied but important phenomenon
  • 3.Data
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Indirect ritual offence in operation
    • 4.2When indirect ritual offence becomes implicit
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (51)
References
Bloch, Sidney, Sally Browning, and Graham McGrath. 2011. “Humour in Group Psychotherapy.” British Journal of Medical Psychology 56: 89–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1987. “Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different?” Journal of Pragmatics 11: 131–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byon, Andrew Sangspil. 2006. “The Role of Linguistic Indirectness and Honorifics in Achieving Linguistic Politeness in Korean Requests.” Journal of Politeness Research 2: 247–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2009. “The Explicit/Implicit Distinction in Pragmatics and the Limits of Explicit Communication.” International Review of Pragmatics 1: 35–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2012. “Identifying Action: Laughter in Non-humorous Reported Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1303–1312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2010. “Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3232–3245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curtner-Smith, Mary E., Anne M. Culp, Rex Culp, Carrie Scheib, Kelly Owen, Angela Tilley, Molly Murphy, Lauren Parkman, and Peter W. Coleman. 2006. “Mothers’ Parenting and Young Economically Disadvantaged Children’s Relational and Overt Bullying.” Journal of Child and Family Studies 15: 177–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Tracy Walker. 2009. “Going Too Far: Complaining, Escalating and Disaffiliation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 2400–2414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunham, Yarrow, Andrew Scott Barron, and Mahzarin R. Banaji. 2006. “From American City to Japanese Village: A Cross-cultural Investigation of Implicit Race Attitudes.” Child Development 77: 1268–1281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2009. “Where Cooperation Meets Politeness: Revisiting Politeness Models in View of the Gricean Framework.” Brno Studies in English 35: 25–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garandeau, Claire F., and Antonius H.N. Cilessen. 2006. “From Indirect Aggression to Invisible Aggression: A Conceptual View on Bullying and Peer Group Manipulation.” Aggression and Violent Behaviour 11: 612–625. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gennep, van, Arnold. 1909 [1960]. Rite de Passage [The rites of passage]. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glasø, Lars, Stig Berge Matthiesen, Morten Birkeland Neilsen, and Ståle Einarksen. 2007. “Do Targets of Workplace Bullying Portray a General Victim Personality Profile?” Scandinavian Journal of Social Psychology 48: 313–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grainger, Karen. 2011. “Indirectness in Zimbabwean English: A Study of Intercultural Communication in the UK.” In Politeness Across Cultures, ed. by Franncesca Bargiela-Chiappini and Daniel Kádár, 171–193. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2010. “Jocular Mockery, (Dis)affiliation, and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 295–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “The role of English as a Scientific Metalanguage for Research in Pragmatics: Reflections on the Metapragmatics of ‘Politeness’ in Japanese.” East Asian Pragmatics 1: 41–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Dániel Z. Kádár. (forthcoming). The Metapragmatics of Politeness and Impoliteness.
Holtgraves, Thomas. 2005. “The Production and Perception of Implicit Performatives.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 2024–2043. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Robert, and Kenneth Drummond. 1990. “Emergent Goals at a Relational Turning Point: The Case of Gordon and Denise.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9: 39–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaszczolt, Katarzyna 2009. “Cancellability and the Primary/Secondary Meaning Distinction.” Intercultural Pragmatics 6: 259–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2013. Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Rosina Márquez Reiter. 2015. “(Im)politeness and (Im)morality: Insights from Intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research 11: 139–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanetsuna, Tomoyuki, Peter K. Smith, and Yohji Morita. 2006. “Copying with Bullying at School: Children’s Recommended Strategies and Attitudes to School-based Interventions in England and Japan.” Aggressive Behaviour 32: 570–580. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kowalski, Robin M., Susan P. Limber, and Patricia W. Agatston. 2008. Cyberbullying: Bullying in the Digital Age. London: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Limberg, Holger. 2009. “Impoliteness and Threat Responses.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1376–1394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar G. Blitvich, and Particia Bou-Franch. 2011. “On-line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2578–2593. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monks, Claire P., Peter K. Smith, Paul Naylor, Christine Barter, Jane L. Ireland, and Iain Coyne. 2009. “Bullying in Different Contexts: Commonalities, Differences and the Role of Theory.” Aggression and Violent Behaviour 14: 146–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olweus, Dan. 1994. “Bullying at School: Basic Facts and Effects of a School Based Intervention Program.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 35: 1171–1190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peter Metcalf and Richard Huntington 1991. Celebrations of Death: The Anthropology of Mortuary Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayner, Charlotte. 1997. “The Incidence of Workplace Bullying.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 7: 199–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ren, Wei, Ching Yin Lin, and Helen Woodfield. 2013. “Variational Pragmatics in Chinese: Some Insights from an Empirical Study.” In Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. by Istvan Kecskes, and Jesus Romero-Trillo, 283–314. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharp, Sonia, and Peter K. Smith (eds) 2002. School Bullying: Insights and Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silver, Maury, Rosaria Conte, Maria Miceli, and Isabella Poggi. 1986. “Humiliation: Feeling, Social Control and the Construction of Identity.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 16: 269–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smart Richman, Laura, and Mark Leary. 2009. “Reactions to Discrimination, Stigmatization, Ostracism, and Other Forms of Interpersonal Rejection: A Multimotive Model.” Psychological Review 116: 365–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2005. “(Im)politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging Their Bases and Interrelationships.” Journal of Politeness Research 1: 95–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tavuchis, Nicholas. 1993. Mea Culpa: A Sociology of Apology and Reconciliation. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2017, in press. “Convention and Ritual.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic Politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Daniel Kádár. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, Angela. 2007. Youth Online: Identity and Literacy in the Digital Age. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thornborrow, Joanna. 2002. Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional discourse. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Twyman, Kimberly A., Conway F. Saylor, Danielle Saia, Michelle M. Macias, Lloyd A. Taylor, and Eve Spratt. 2010. “Bullying and Ostracism Experiences in Children with Special Health Care Needs.” Journal of Developmental & Behavioural Pediatrics, 31: 1–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Goethem, Anne A.J., Ron H.J. Scholte, and Reinout W. Wiers. 2010. “Explicit and Implicit Bullying Attitudes in Relation to Bullying Behaviour.” Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 38: 629–642. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whutnow, Robert. 1989. Meaning and Moral Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zurcher, Louis A. 1985. “The War Game: Organizational Scripting and the Expression of Emotion.” Symbolic Interaction 8: 191–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Al Zidjaly, Najma
2024. Stance and food activism on Arabic Twitter (X): a multimodal analysis. Multimodal Communication 13:2 ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Bączkowska, Anna, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Slavko Žitnik, Chaya Liebeskind, Marcin Trojszczak & Giedre Valunaite Oleskeviciene
2024. Implicit offensive language taxonomy. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 20:2 ► pp. 463 ff. DOI logo
Badarneh, Muhammad A.
2020. ‘Like a donkey carrying books’. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Sen Zhang
2019. Alignment, ‘politeness’ and implicitness in Chinese political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 18:5 ► pp. 698 ff. DOI logo
Moulinou, Iphigenia
2019. Explicit and implicit discursive strategies and moral order in a trial process. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue