Cover not available

In:Implicitness: From lexis to discourse
Edited by Piotr Cap and Marta Dynel
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 276] 2017
► pp. 121–146

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 6
Implicitness via overt untruthfulness

Grice on Quality-based figures of speech

 | University of Łódź
Published online: 30 June 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276.06dyn
Grice’s (1989a [1975], 1989b [1978]) conversational implicature is a salient manifestation of implicitness, whilst the four figures of speech contingent on flouting the first maxim of Quality constitute an important group of phenomena that promote conversational implicature. Implicitness is then central to the figures of: metaphor, irony, hyperbole and meiosis. This chapter gives an exegesis of Grice’s view of these Quality-based figures of speech, which enjoy a special status in his framework of conversational logic. The critical analysis is performed against the backdrop of the pertinent neo-Gricean and post-Gricean scholarship. This chapter thus sheds new light on selected vexing issues in Grice’s philosophy, with some being (unjustly) taken for granted or oversimplified, and other ones being the subject of ongoing debates.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Maxim nonfulfilment as the source of implicature
  • 3.Quality and truthfulness
    • 3.1Truthfulness and saying
  • 4.Grice’s vew of metaphor, irony, hyperbole and meiosis and criticism thereof
  • 5.Quality-based figures as an alleged flaw in Grice’s proposal of implicature
  • Epilogue
  • Author queries
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (60)
References
Akmajian, Adrian, Richard Demers, Ann Farmer, and Robert M. Harnish. 2001. Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baptista, Luca. 2014. “Say What? On Grice on What Is Said.” European Journal of Philosophy 22 (1): 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benton, Matthew. 2014. “Gricean Quality.” Noûs. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhaya Nair, Rukimi. 1985. “Telling Lies: Some Literary and Other Violations of Grice’s Maxim of Quality.” Nottingham Linguistic Circular 14: 53–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 1983. “Asserting.” Noûs 17: 637–650. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camp, Elisabeth. 2006. “Contextualism, Metaphor and What Is Said.” Mind & Language 21(3): 280–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert. 2000. “On Necessary Conditions for Verbal Irony Comprehension.” Pragmatics and Cognition 8: 277–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert, and Jennifer O’Brien. 2000. “Contrast and Pragmatics in Figurative Language: Anything Understatement Can Do, Irony Can Do Better.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1557–1583. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Bethan. 2000. “Grice’s Cooperative Principle: Getting the Meaning Across.” Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 8: 1–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Grice’s Cooperative Principle: Meaning and Rationality.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 2308–2331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dinges, Alexander. 2015. “Innocent Implicatures.” Journal of Pragmatics 87: 54–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2008. “There Is Method in the Humorous Speaker’s Madness: Humour and Grice’s model.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4(1): 159–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. “A Web of Deceit: A neo-Gricean View on Types of Verbal Deception.” International Review of Pragmatics 3(2): 137–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013a. “Being Cooperatively Impolite: Grice’s Model in the Context of (Im)Politeness Theories.” In Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Jesus Romero-Trillo, 55–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. “Irony from a Neo-Gricean Perspective: On Untruthfulness and Evaluative Implicature.” Intercultural Pragmatics 10: 403–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Intention to Deceive, Bald-Faced Lies, and Deceptive Implicature: Insights into Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface .” Intercultural Pragmatics 12: 309–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. "The irony of irony: Irony based on truthfulness." Corpus Pragmatics 1: 3-36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fogelin, R. 1988. Figuratively Speaking. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1983. “The Domain of Pragmatics.” In Language and Communication, ed. by Jack Richards, and Richard Schmidt, 29–59. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garmendia, Joana. 2010. “Irony Is Critical.” Pragmatics & Cognition 18: 397–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “She’s (Not) a Fine Friend: “Saying” and Criticism in Irony.” Intercultural Pragmatics 8: 41–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “A (Neo)Gricean Account of Irony: An Answer to Relevance Theory.” International Review of Pragmatics 7: 40–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garmendia, Joana, and Kepa Korta. 2007. “The Point of Irony.” In Language, Representation and Reasoning, ed. by Mixel Aurnague, Kepa Korta, and Jesus M. Larrazabal, 189–200. Bilbao: upv-ehu.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond. 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1989a [1975]. “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words, Herbert Paul Grice, 22–40. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989b [1978]. “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation.” Studies in the Way of Words, Herbert Paul Grice, 41–57. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H.P. 1989d [1968]. “Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions”. In Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., 86–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1989c. “Retrospective Epilogue.” In Studies in the Way of Words, Herbert Paul Grice, 339–386. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Transl. by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2015. Im/Politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haverkate, Henk. 1990. “A Speech Act Analysis of Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 77–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jary, Mark. 2010. Assertion. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Quantity, Truthfulness and Ironic Effect.” Language Sciences 33(2): 305–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahon, James. 2015. “The Definition of Lying and Deception.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta, URL = <[URL]> Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg. 2005. “Lying and Falsely Implicating.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1373–1399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Boston/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mooney, Annabelle. 2004. “Co-operation, Violation and Making Sense.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 899–920. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nemesi, Attila. 2010. “Data-Gathering Methods in Research on Hyperbole Production and Interpretation.” In The Role of Data at the Semantic-Pragmatic Interface, ed. by Eniko T. Nemeth and Karoly Bibok, 381–417. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal. 2004. “Hyperbole, Extreme Case Formulations.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1727–1739. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ozar, Anne. 2008. The Moral Significance of Sincerity. PhD Thesis. Fordham University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pagin, Peter. 2015. “Assertion.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <[URL]> Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles. 1934. “Belief and Judgment.” In Collected Papers, vol. 5, ed. by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, 376–387. Cambridge: Harvard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 9: 219–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reimer, Marga. 2013. “Grice on Irony and Metaphor: Discredited by the Experimental Evidence?” International Review of Pragmatics 5: 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saul, Jennifer. 2012. Lying, Misleading, and the Role of What Is Said. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, John. 1657. Mysterie of Rhetorique Unvail'd. Facsimile reprint of 1st ed., London: George Everfden.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soames, Scott. 2008. “Drawing the line between meaning and implicature—and relating both to assertion.” Noûs 42: 440–4655. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokke, Andreas. 2013. “Lying and Asserting.” Journal of Philosophy 110: 33–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincent Marrelli, Jocelyne. 2003. “Truthfulness.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 1–48. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Words in the Way of Truth. Truthfulness, Deception, Lying across Cultures and Disciplines. Napoli: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 1995. “Is There a Maxim of Truthfulness?” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 197–212.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “The Pragmatics of Verbal Irony: Echo or Pretence?” Lingua 116: 1722–1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2000 [2002, 2012]. “Truthfulness and Relevance.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics: 215–254. [Reprinted as Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2002. “Truthfulness and Relevance.” Mind 111: 583–632; “Truthfulness and Relevance.” In D. Wilson, and D. Sperber. Meaning and Relevance, 47–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Explaining Irony.” In Meaning and Relevance, Deirdre Wilson, and Dan Sperber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 123–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Peña-Cervel, Mª Sandra
2025. Sources of incongruity in advertising. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza-Ibáñez, Francisco J. & Maria Sandra Peña-Cervel
2025. A COGNITIVE LINGUISTIC APPROACH TO HYPERBOLIC BLENDS. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
HIRATA, ICHIRO
2021. IMPLICATURES OF VOCATIVES AND THEIR THEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 37:2 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2016. Comparing and combining covert and overt untruthfulness. Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1 ► pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2016. On untruthfulness, its adversaries and strange bedfellows. Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2020. To Say the Least: Where Deceptively Withholding Information Ends and Lying Begins. Topics in Cognitive Science 12:2 ► pp. 555 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Figuring out Figuration [Figurative Thought and Language, 14], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue