In:Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics
Edited by István Kecskés and Stavros Assimakopoulos
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 274] 2017
► pp. 75–102
Chapter 4“Burn the antifa traitors at the stake…”
Transnational political cyber-exchanges, proximisation of emotions
Published online: 14 June 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.274.05bai
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.274.05bai
Abstract
The present contribution examines the use of lingua franca in a transnational computer mediated corpus, focusing on the extreme-right Greek political party Golden Dawn. Our data include the visual identities, pseudonyms and verbal comments of discussants. We investigate the processes through which an emergent common ground is built in this on-line far-right discourse, mainly through co-constructed salient lexical and conceptual units. This salience helps proximise emotions and in particular the notion of a threat which is at the heart of far-right discourse argumentation. We shed light on the discursive strategies put in place on the individual level with a view to creating, perpetuating and strengthening the immanency and closeness of the threat, which allegedly legitimises a particular course of action. When comparing our findings with the results of previous studies focused on other Greek and French data we argue, on the basis of the presence of common features, for the existence of a dedicated lingua franca which could be called (extreme)-right newspeak.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical considerations
- 2.1Ideological common ground defining far-right discourse
- 2.2Salience of lexical units defining axiological values of far-right discourse
- 2.3Cyber communication context: Proximising a threat
- 3.Data, typology, methodology
- 3.1Data
- 3.2Methodology
- 4.Analysis of avatars and pseudonyms
- 4.1Quantitative results
- 4.2Proximisation of positive emotions towards the Self
- 4.2.1Spatial proximisation
- 4.2.2Temporal proximisation
- 4.2.3Axiological values
- 4.3proximisation of negative emotions towards the Other
- 4.3.1Discrediting the Other
- 4.3.2Resisting the Other
- 5.Salience of lexical units and emerging common ground in comments
- 5.1Sarcasm, hostility and disparaging metaphors
- 5.2Main salient lexical units
- 5.2.1The Self
- 5.2.2The Other
- 5.2.3The party and its ideology
- 5.3Battle over salient lexical meanings
- 5.4Proximising the Threat
- 6.Proximising values to build a far-right newspeak
Notes References Appendix
References (37)
Androutsopoulos, Jannis K. 2000. “Non-standard Spellings in Media texts: The Case of German Fanzines.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 4: 514–533.
Bal, Mieke. 2002. Travelling Concepts in the Humanities: A Rough Guide. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Baider, Fabienne, and Maria Constantinou. 2014. “Language of Cyber-politics: ‘Imaging/imagining’ Communities.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 10: 213–242
. 2015. “Jean-Marie Le Pen vs. Marine Le Pen: Un ‘Ethos Émotif’ Différent?” Studia Romanica Posnanesia. Poznan: Verbalisation de l’Émotion dans le Discours Médiatique 42: 3–19.
Baider, Fabienne. 2013. “The Saliency Hypothesis: Affects and Emotions.” In Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. by Istvan Kecskes, and Jesús Romero-Trillo. 7–25. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2013a. “proximisation Theory and Critical Discourse Studies: A Promising Connection?” International Review of Pragmatics 5: 292–316.
. 2013b. proximisation: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chilton, Paul. 2005. “Discourse Space Theory: Geometry, Brain and Shifting Viewpoints.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3: 78–116.
Davydova, Olga. 2008. “The Bronze Soldier Goes Transnational: Mediascapes and the Formation of Identities in Internet Discussions.” Ethnopolitics 7: 391–411.
Derks, Daantje, Agneta H. Fischer, and Arjan E. R. Bos. 2008. “The Role of Emotion in Computer-mediated Communication: A Review.” Computers in Human Behavior 24: 766–785.
Drouin, Patrick. 2003. “Term Extraction Using Non-technical Corpora as a Point of Leverage.” Terminology, 9: 99–115.
de Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse Society 10: 149–172.
Elgenius, Gabriella. 2005. Expressions of Nationhood: National Symbols and Ceremonies in Contemporary Europe. PhD thesis, London School of Economics.
Giora, Rachel. 1997. “Understanding Figurative and Literal Language: The Graded Salience Hypothesis.” Cognitive Linguistics 7: 183–206.
Grewal, Inderpal. 2005. Transnational America: Feminisms, Diasporas, Neoliberalisms. Durham, NC: Duke University Press London.
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ivaldi, Gilles. 2012. “Permanences et Évolutions de l’Idéologie Frontiste.” In Le Front National: Mutations de l’Extrême-droite Française, ed. by Pascal Dewit, 95–112. Brussels: Editions Université de Bruxelles.
Kecskes, Istvan. 2008. “Dueling Context: A Dynamic Model of Meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics 40: 385–406.
Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang. 2009. “Activating, Seeking and Creating Common Ground: A Socio-cognitive Approach.” Pragmatics and Cognition 17: 331–355.
Kecskes, Istvan. 2011. “Interculturality and Intercultural Pragmatics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Intercultural Communication, ed. by Jane Jackson, 67–84. London: Routledge.
Landry, Elaine M. 2000. “Scrolling Around the New Organization: The Potential for Conflict in the On-line Environment.” Negotiation Journal 16, 133–142.
Mayer, Nonna. 2012. “De Jean-Marie à Marine Le Pen: l’Électorat du Front National a-t-il Changé?” In Le Front National: Mutations de l’Extrême-droite Française, ed. by Pascal Dewit, 143–160. Brussels: Editions Université de Bruxelles.
Michard, Claire. 1988. “Some Socio-enunciative Characteristics of Scientific Texts Concerning the Sexes, the Nature of the Right.” In The Nature of the Right: A Feminist Analysis of Order Patterns, ed. by Gill Seidel, 27–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Musolff, Andreas. 2007. “Which Role Do Metaphors Play in Racial Prejudice? The Function of Anti-Semitic Imagery in Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’.” Patterns of Prejudice 41: 21–44.
O’Sullivan, Patrick B., and Andrew J. Flanagin. 2003. “Reconceptualizing ‘Flaming’ and Other Problematic Messages.” New Media & Society 5: 69–94.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.
Reutenauer, Coralie, Mathieu Valette, and Evelyne Jacquey 2010. “De L’annotation Sémique Globale à L’interprétation Locale.” Paper presented at the Arco’09 conference, 9–11 November 2009, Rouen.
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Liebhart Karin. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Yus, Francisco. 2011. Cyberpragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Baider, Fabienne & Maria Constantinou
Baider, Fabienne & Maria Constantinou
Assimakopoulos, Stavros, Fabienne H. Baider & Sharon Millar
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
