Cover not available

In:Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff
Edited by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner and John Heritage
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 273] 2017
► pp. 145–166

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Interactional uses of acknowledgment tokens

‘ung’ and ‘e’ as responses to multi-unit turns in Korean conversation

Published online: 24 May 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.273.08oh
In this article we explore the situated meanings of two acknowledgment tokens, ung and e, in Korean conversations. We demonstrate how ung and e, which may seem interchangeable at first sight, can actually be deployed for distinct interactional functions by marking different interactional orientations the speaker has toward the turn-so-far. Specifically, ung is used as a typical continuer that treats the turn-so-far as an in-progress multi-unit turn, whereas e is used to provide the speaker’s appreciation which has been made relevant by the turn-so-far, e.g., in response to the prior assessment, the newsworthiness of the preceding talk, or particularly emphasized telling. This article thus adds evidence that acknowledgment tokens do not behave in interaction as an undifferentiated class.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Analysis
  • 3.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Abbreviations
References (41)
References
Clancy, Patricia M., Sandra A. Thompson, Ryoko Suzuki, and Hongyin Tao. 1996. “The Conversational Use of Reactive Tokens in English, Japanese and Mandarin.” Journal of Pragmatics 26: 355–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drummond, Kent, and Robert Hopper. 1993a. “Back Channels Revisited: Acknowledgment Tokens and Speakership Incipiency.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 157–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993b. “Some Uses of Yeah .” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 203–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duncan, Starkey J. 1972. “Some Signals and Rules for Taking Speaking Turns in Conversations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23: 283–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. “On the Structure of Speaker-Auditor Interaction during Speaking Turns.” Language in Society 2: 161–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duncun, Starkey J., and Donald W. Fiske. 1977. Face-to-Face Interaction: Research, Methods, Theory. Hillsdale and NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, Rod. 1997. “The Conversation Object Mm: A Weak and Variable Acknowledging Token.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 20 (2): 131–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1986. “Between and Within: Alternative and Sequential Treatments of Continuers and Assessments.” Human Studies 9: 205–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Recognizing Assessable Names.” In Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In Honor of Robert Hopper, ed. by Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, and Jenny Mandelbaum, 151–161. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by John M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. “Current Developments in Conversation Analysis.” In Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Derek Roger and Peter Bull, 21–47. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “ Oh-prefaced Responses to Inquiry.” Language in Society 27: 291–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1997. “The Northridge Earthquake Conversations: The Floor Structure and the ‘Loop’ Sequence in Japanese Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 28: 661–693. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1979. “A Technique for Inviting Laugher and Its Subsequent Acceptance Declination.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psthas, 79–96. New York: Irvington Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. “Notes on a Systematic Deployment of the Acknowledgment Tokens ‘Yeah’ and ‘Mm Hm’.” Papers in Linguistics 17: 197–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene. H. 1991. “On the Syntax of Sentences-in-Progress.” Language in Society 20: 441–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1967. “Some Functions of Gaze Direction in Social Interaction.” Acta Psychologica 26: 22–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 2004. “Backchannels as Achievements of Social Interaction in Korean Conversation.” Sahoe Onohak [Sociolinguistics] 12: 65–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1999. “Phrasal Unit Boundaries and Organization of Turns and Sequences in Korean Conversation.” Human Studies 22: 425–446. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun, and Kyung-Hee Suh. 1994. “The Discourse Connective Nikka in Korean Conversation.” In Japanese/Korean Linguistics Vol. 4, ed. by Noriko Akatsuka, 113–129. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko. 1986. “On Back-Channel Behavior in Japanese and English Casual Conversation.” Linguistics 24: 1079–1108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. “Conversation Management in Contrast: Listener Response in Japanese and American English.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 397–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie. 1990. “‘Yes’, ‘No’ and ‘Mhm’: Variations in Acknowledgment Choices.” In Les Formes de la Conversation, ed. by Bernard Conein, Mochel de Fornel, and Louis Quéré, 251–282. Paris: CNET.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael. 2003. “Talking Back: ‘Small’ Interactional Response Tokens in Everyday Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26 (1): 33–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mizutani, Nobuko. 1982. “The Listener’s Response in Japanese Conversation.” Sociolinguistic Newsletter 13: 33–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis, ed. by John M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1982. “Discourse as Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘Uh Huh’ and Other Things that Come between Sentences.” In Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics: Analyzing Discourse, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 71–93. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “When ‘Others’ Initiate Repair.” Applied Linguistics 21: 205–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Recipient Activities: The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Response in Finnish Conversations.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 165–195. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2004. “‘No no no’ and Other Types of Multiple Sayings in Social Interaction.” Human Communication Research 30 (2): 260–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroko. 1999. Turn-taking in Japanese Conversation: A Study in Grammar and Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Turn Projection in Japanese Talk-in-interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 33: 1–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin, and Sandra, A. Thompson. 1991. “English Backchannels in Mandarin Conversations: A Case Study of Superstratum Pragmatic 'Interference'.” Journal of Pragmatics 16: 209–223.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, Sheida. 1989. “Backchannels across Cultures: A Study of Americans and Japanese.” Language in Society 18: 59–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yngve, Victor H. 1970. “On Getting a Word in Edgewise.” In Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. by Mary Ann Campbell and James Lindholm, 567–578. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Young, Richard, and Jina Lee. 2004. “Identifying Units in Interaction: Reactive Tokens in Korean and English Conversations.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 8: 380–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Don H. 1993. “Acknowledgment Tokens and Speakership Incipiency Revisited.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 179–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Wang, Wei
2025. Response particles in Mandarin conversation. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 16:1 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Del Río Villanueva, Carmen Amalia
2024. La construcción interaccional de la (des)información: de la entrevista política de televisión en vivo a las notas periodísticas. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 30:3 ► pp. 531 ff. DOI logo
Ju, Hee
2019. Conveying the Point of Telling a Story in First-Person Narratives. The Korean Language in America 23:2 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. OKAY across Languages [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 34], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue