Cover not available

In:Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff
Edited by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner and John Heritage
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 273] 2017
► pp. 79–104

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Responses to Wh-question challenges

|
Published online: 24 May 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.273.05kos
This chapter builds on my previous studies of wh-questions that convey reversed polarity assertions, for example, “When have I.” used to convey “I never have” (Koshik 2003;2005). These questions challenge the grounds for a prior claim or action, suggesting that there is no basis for that claim or action and the question is therefore unanswerable. This chapter focuses on responses to these challenges. At times questioners leave no sequentially appropriate space for a response. However, when recipients do respond, responses that reject the challenge provide grammatically type-conforming answers to the questions, treating the questions as answerable. Responses that align with the challenge either treat the question as unanswerable or they accept or agree with the assertion conveyed by the challenge.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Reversed polarity questions
    • 1.2Type-conforming and non-conforming responses
  • 2.No sequentially appropriate slot for response
  • 3.Non-conforming responses that align with the challenge
    • 3.1Accepting the challenge
    • 3.2Agreeing with the challenge
    • 3.3Agreeing with a challenge to a non-present party
    • 3.4Treating the question as unanswerable
  • 4.Rejecting the challenge with type-conforming responses
    • 4.1Rejecting the challenge by answering the question
    • 4.2Backing down
  • 5.Type-conforming joke response
  • 6.Summary and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (22)
References
Bolinger, Dwight Le Merton. 1957. Interrogative Structures of American English: The Direct Question. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyd, Elizabeth, and John Heritage. 2006. "Taking the History: Questioning during Comprehensive History Taking." In Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, ed. by John Heritage and Douglas Maynard, 151–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, Marianne, and Diane Larsen-Freeman. 1999. The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course (2nd ed.). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven. 2002. "'Unanswerable' Questions: How as an Interrogative Form." Paper presented at the ASA Annual Meeting , Chicago.
Drew, Paul. 1998. "Complaints about Transgressions and Misconduct." Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (3&4): 295–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A., and Sandra Thompson. 2010. "Responses to Wh-Questions in English Conversation." Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (2): 133–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael, and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, Larry R. 1978. "Some Aspects of Negation." In Universals of Human Language, Vol 4: Syntax, ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson, and Edith A. Moravcsik, 127–210. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koshik, Irene. 2002. "A Conversation Analytic Study of Yes/No Questions which Convey Reversed Polarity Assertions." Journal of Pragmatics 34 (12): 1851–1877. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. "Wh-Questions Used as Challenges." Discourse Studies 5 (1): 51–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 1991. "On the Syntax of Sentences-in-Progress.” Language in Society 20: 441–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. "On the 'Semi-Permeable' Character of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional Entry into the Turn Space of Another Speaker." In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel. A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 238–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolf, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2000. The Structure of Responding: Type-Conforming and Nonconforming Responses to Yes/No Type Interrogatives. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. "Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding." American Sociological Review 68: 939–967. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. "A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation." Language 50 (4): 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1984. "On Some Questions and Ambiguities in Conversation." In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 28–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. "Some Sources of Misunderstanding in Talk-in-Interaction." Linguistics 25 (1): 201–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. "Practices and Actions: Boundary Cases of Other-Initiated Repair." Discourse Processes 23: 499–545. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. "The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation." Language 53 (2): 361–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Riccioni, Ilaria, Alessia Bertolazzi & Ramona Bongelli
2024. ‘The benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks… they say’. Language and Dialogue 14:2 ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, Sandra A. Thompson & Barbara A. Fox
2023. Do English affirmative polar interrogatives with any favor negative responses?. In Responding to Polar Questions across Languages and Contexts [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 35], ► pp. 350 ff. DOI logo
Drake, Veronika
2021. Alternative questions and their responses in English interaction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 31:1 ► pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
Clift, Rebecca & Marco Pino
2020. Turning the Tables: Objecting to Conduct in Conflict Talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:4 ► pp. 463 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Wei
2020. Grammatical conformity in question-answer sequences: The case of meiyou in Mandarin conversation. Discourse Studies 22:5 ► pp. 610 ff. DOI logo
Pino, Marco
2018. Invoking the Complainer’s Past Transgressions: A Practice for Undermining Complaints in Therapeutic Community Meetings. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:2 ► pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
Heinemann, Trine
2008. Questions of accountability: yes—no interrogatives that are unanswerable. Discourse Studies 10:1 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue